List of giant squid specimens and sightings
This []list of giant squid specimens and sightings is a comprehensive timeline of recorded human encounters with members of the genus Architeuthis, popularly known as giant squid. It includes animals that were caught by fishermen, found washed ashore, recovered from sperm whales and other predatory species, as well as those reliably sighted at sea. The list also covers specimens incorrectly assigned to the genus Architeuthis in original descriptions or later publications.
Background
History of discovery
Tales of giant squid have been common among mariners since ancient times, but the animals were long considered mythical and often associated with the kraken of Nordic legend. The giant squid did not gain widespread scientific acceptance until specimens became available to zoologists in the second half of the 19th century, beginning with the formal naming of Architeuthis dux by Japetus Steenstrup in 1857, from fragmentary Bahamian material collected two years earlier. In the same work, Steenstrup also named a second species, Architeuthis monachus, based on a preserved beak, the only part saved from a carcass that washed ashore in Denmark in 1853 . The giant squid came to public prominence in 1861 when the French corvette Alecton encountered a live animal at the surface while navigating near Tenerife. A report of the incident filed by the ship's captain was almost certainly seen by Jules Verne and adapted by him for the description of the monstrous squid in his 1870 novel, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas.The giant squid's existence was established beyond doubt only in the 1870s, with the appearance of an extraordinary number of complete specimens—both dead and alive—in Newfoundland waters. These were meticulously documented in a series of papers by Yale zoologist Addison Emery Verrill. Two of these Newfoundland specimens, both from 1873, were particularly significant as they were among the earliest to be photographed: first a single severed tentacle—hacked off a live animal as it "attacked" a fishing boat —and weeks later an intact animal in two parts. The head and limbs of this latter specimen were famously shown draped over the sponge bath of Moses Harvey, a local clergyman, essayist, and amateur naturalist. Harvey secured and reported widely on both of these important specimens—as well as numerous others —and it was largely through his efforts that giant squid became known to North American and British zoologists. Recognition of Architeuthis as a real animal led to the reappraisal of earlier reports of gigantic tentacled sea creatures, with some of these subsequently being accepted as records of giant squid, the earliest stretching back to at least the 17th century.
For a time in the late 19th century, almost every major specimen of which material was saved was described as a new species. In all, some twenty species names were coined. However, there is no widely agreed basis for distinguishing between the named species, and both morphological and genetic data point to the existence of a single, globally distributed species, which according to the principle of priority must be known by the earliest available name: Architeuthis dux.
It is not known why giant squid become stranded on shore, but it may be because the distribution of deep, cold water where they live is temporarily altered. Marine biologist and Architeuthis specialist Frederick Aldrich proposed that there may be a periodicity to the strandings around Newfoundland, and based on historical data suggested an average interval between mass strandings of some 30 years. Aldrich used this value to correctly predict a relatively small stranding event between 1964 and 1966. The appearance of specimens around New Zealand has been linked to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, with multiple strandings in the Cook Strait in 1879–1880 and 1982–1984 coinciding with or immediately following extreme negative peaks of the Southern Oscillation Index. Although strandings continue to occur sporadically throughout the world, few have been as frequent as those in Newfoundland in the late 19th century. A notable exception was a 15-month period between 2014 and 2015, during which an unprecedented 57 specimens were recorded from Japanese coastal waters of the Sea of Japan.
Though the total number of recorded giant squid specimens now runs into the hundreds, the species remains notoriously elusive and little known. Attempts to capture a glimpse of a live giant squid—described as "the most elusive image in natural history"—were mooted since at least the 1960s. Efforts intensified significantly towards the end of the century, with the launch of several multi-million-dollar expeditions in the late 1990s, though these were all unsuccessful. The first years of the 21st century saw a number of breakthroughs in live giant squid imaging that ultimately culminated in the first recordings of live animals in their natural deep-water habitat—from both a remote camera system and a crewed submersible—in July 2012. Despite these recent advances and the growing number of both specimens and recordings of live animals, the species continues to occupy a unique place in the public imagination. As Roper et al. (2015:83) wrote: "Few events in the natural world stimulate more excitement and curiosity among scientists and laymen alike than the discovery of a specimen of Architeuthis."
Distribution patterns
The genus Architeuthis has a cosmopolitan or bi-subtropical distribution, and carcasses are known to wash ashore on every continent except Antarctica. The greatest numbers of specimens have been recorded in: the North Atlantic around Newfoundland, northern Spain, Norway, the northern British Isles, and the archipelagos of the Azores and Madeira; the South Atlantic off South Africa and Namibia; the northwestern Pacific off Japan ; and the southwestern Pacific around New Zealand and Australia.The vast majority of specimens are of oceanic origin, including marginal seas broadly open to adjacent ocean, especially the Tasman Sea and Sea of Japan, but also the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea, among others. A handful are known from the far western Mediterranean Sea, but these records do not necessarily indicate that the Mediterranean falls within the natural range of the giant squid, as the specimens may have been transported there by inflowing Atlantic water. Similarly, giant squid are unlikely to naturally occur in the North Sea owing to its shallow depth. They are generally absent from equatorial and high polar latitudes.
Total number of specimens
According to Guerra et al. (2006), 592 confirmed giant squid specimens were known as of the end of 2004. Of these, 306 came from the Atlantic Ocean, 264 from the Pacific Ocean, 20 from the Indian Ocean, and 2 from the Mediterranean Sea. The figures for specimens collected in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans further broke down as follows: 148 in the northeastern Atlantic, 126 in the northwestern Atlantic, [|26] in the southeastern Atlantic, 6 in the southwestern Atlantic, 43 in the northeastern Pacific, 28 in the northwestern Pacific, 10 in the southeastern Pacific, and 183 in the southwestern Pacific.Guerra & González (2009) reported that the total number of recorded giant squid specimens stood at 624. Guerra et al. (2011) gave an updated figure of 677 specimens. Paxton (2016a) put the total at around 700 as of 2015, of which 460 had been measured in some way. This number has increased substantially in recent years, with 57 specimens recorded from the Sea of Japan over an extraordinary 15-month period in 2014–2015. The giant squid nevertheless remains a rarely encountered animal, especially considering its wide distribution and large size, with Richard Ellis writing that "each giant squid that washes up or is taken from the stomach of a sperm whale is still an occasion for a teuthological celebration".
| Region | Number of specimens | % of total | Found stranded or floating | From fishing | From predators | Method of capture unknown |
| NE Atlantic | 152 | 22.5 | 49 | 31 | 15 | 5 |
| NW Atlantic | 148 | 21.9 | 61 | 30 | 1 | 8 |
| SE Atlantic | 60* | 8.9 | 10 | 60 | 17 | 13 |
| SW Atlantic | 6 | 0.9 | 50 | 16 | 1 | 33 |
| NE Pacific | 43 | 6.4 | 7 | 56 | 30 | 7 |
| NW Pacific | 30* | 4.4 | 30 | 35 | 30 | 5 |
| SE Pacific | 10 | 1.5 | 90 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| SW Pacific | 183 | 27.0 | 12 | 41 | 42 | 5 |
| Indian Ocean | 33** | 4.8 | 6 | 94 | 0 | 0 |
| W Mediterranean | 3 | 0.4 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Equatorial/tropical | 9 | 1.3 | 11 | 44 | 45 | 0 |
| All regions | 677 | 100.0 |
File:Giant squid wanted poster.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.13|"Wanted" poster issued by Frederick Aldrich on 24 August 1988. The flailing giant squid is from an illustration by Canadian wildlife artist Glen Loates, known for his naturalistic depictions of "Architeuthis in action", which were based on collaborations with Aldrich and which Richard Ellis described as "certainly the most accurate and exciting depictions of the monster ever drawn".
Procurement, preservation, and display
Preserved giant squid specimens are much sought after for both study and display. In the mid-1960s, marine biologist and giant squid expert Frederick Aldrich of the Memorial University of Newfoundland organised a "squid squad" with the intent of securing specimens for study. In the 1980s, Aldrich resorted to distributing eye-catching "Wanted" posters offering rewards for "finding and holding" specimens stranded on the Newfoundland coast, "the value being dependent on their condition". Aldrich (1991:459) wrote that "uch efforts were not futile, for in the intervening years I have secured either the specimens or information on 15 animals", though according to Hoff (2003:85) the rewards went unclaimed. Largely through Aldrich's efforts, the Marine Sciences Research Laboratory at Logy Bay, Newfoundland, assembled a substantial early collection of giant squid; as of 1971, it held 8 specimens, with the remains of 3 displayed together in a tank by the main entrance.Guerra et al. (2011:1990) estimated that around 30 giant squid were exhibited at museums and aquaria worldwide, while Guerra & Segonzac (2014:118–119) provided an updated list of 35. The purpose-built Museo del Calamar Gigante in Luarca, Spain, had by far the largest collection on public display, but many of the museum's 14 or so total specimens were destroyed during a storm on 2 February 2014. At least 13 specimens were exhibited in Japan as of February 2017, of which 10 had been acquired since 2013.
A number of fragmentary giant squid remains were displayed as part of "In Search of Giant Squid", a Smithsonian travelling exhibition curated by Clyde Roper that visited a dozen US museums and other educational institutions between September 2004 and August 2009. The exhibition opened its national tour at Yale University's Peabody Museum of Natural History, which has maintained a strong association with the giant squid from the time of the Newfoundland strandings in the 1870s. Preparations for the Peabody exhibition, overseen by site curator Eric Lazo-Wasem, uncovered giant squid material in the museum's collections that was not previously known to be extant, including original specimens from Addison Emery Verrill's time.
In the late 19th century, the giant squid's popular appeal and desirability to museums—but scarcity of preserved specimens—spawned a long tradition of "life-sized" models that continues to the present day. Verrill's description of the famous Catalina specimen of 1877, which he personally examined in New York City the same year, served as the basis for the earliest models. The second Portugal Cove specimen, from 1881, was probably also used as a reference, as it was seen by Verrill shortly before he began modelling. Following Verrill's design, his draughtsman James Henry Emerton built the very first giant squid model for the Peabody Museum of Natural History in 1883. A second, near-identical model was soon delivered to the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University, and a third was made for the International Fisheries Exhibition, held in London in 1883. The Verrill and Emerton models were followed by six similar examples, again based on the Catalina specimen, produced by Ward's Natural Science Establishment of Rochester, New York, of which two were sold internationally: to London's Natural History Museum and the Oceanographic Museum of Monaco. The original Peabody Museum model was discarded around 1964 and replaced two years later by one based on both the Logy Bay specimen of 1873 and on several Newfoundland specimens from the 1960s, particularly the one found off Conche in October 1964.
Real giant squid specimens have traditionally been preserved in either solutions of alcohols or in formalin. More recently, concerns about the fire and health risks posed by these substances have led to alternative preservative fluids being explored, such as propylene glycol, glycerol, and the hydrofluoroether Novec 7100. Additionally, methods such as plastination have made it possible to display authentic giant squid specimens in a dry state. A giant squid was first plastinated in 2000 and this specimen, nicknamed "Wheke", has been on display at the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle in Paris since 2008; two further specimens were plastinated in 2004, as were various parts of a 2015 specimen from Japan. Several other individuals have been prepared for display by more conventional drying methods, such as hard curing, though this necessarily results in greatly shrunken specimens. At least one giant squid has been entirely embedded in acrylic, a process that rendered its flesh translucent. Beginning in 2005, a specimen nicknamed "Cal" was uniquely displayed at Melbourne Aquarium encased in a 3.5-tonne block of ice ; it was turned into a conventional wet specimen several years later. Additionally, a number of other specimens have been temporarily placed on public display in a frozen or chilled state.
Reported sizes
Giant squid size—long a subject of both popular debate and academic inquiry—has often been misreported and exaggerated. Reports of specimens reaching or even exceeding in total length are widespread, but no animals approaching this size have been scientifically documented in recent times, despite the hundreds of specimens available for study. The "Thimble Tickle specimen" reported by Verrill (1880a:191) is often cited as the largest giant squid ever recorded, and the specimen described by Kirk (1888) as Architeuthis longimanus —a strangely proportioned animal that has been much commented on—is sometimes cited as the longest. It is now thought likely that such lengths were achieved by great lengthening of the two long feeding tentacles, analogous to stretching elastic bands, or resulted from inadequate measurement methods such as pacing.Based on a 40-year data set of more than 50 giant squid specimens, Roper & Shea (2013:114) suggest an average total length at maturity of and a "rarely encountered maximum length" of. Of the nearly 100 specimens examined by Clyde Roper, the largest was "46 feet long". O'Shea & Bolstad (2008) give a maximum total length of for females based on the examination of more than 130 specimens, measured post mortem and relaxed, as well as beaks recovered from sperm whales. Steve O'Shea estimated the maximum total length for males at. Yukhov (2014:242) gives a maximum total length of for the species, based on records from the southern hemisphere; Remeslo (2011) gives. McClain et al. (2015) regard a specimen from Asturias, Spain, as the "longest scientifically verified" and "largest recorded and well-preserved specimen in the contemporary, peer-reviewed literature". Charles G. M. Paxton performed a statistical analysis using literature records of giant squid specimens and concluded that "squid with a conservative TL of would seem likely based on current data", but the study has been heavily criticised by experts in the field.
File:Distribution of total length, mantle length and mass in Architeuthis dux.png|thumb|left|upright=1.8|Frequency distribution of total length, mantle length, and mass in Architeuthis dux, from McClain et al. (2015). The extreme outlier is from an estimate mentioned in Verrill (1880a:181) and is unlikely to be accurate; the next most massive individual in the data set was only and 95% of specimens were below. Similarly, 95% of individuals had recorded mantle lengths below and total lengths below.
O'Shea & Bolstad (2008) give a maximum mantle length of based on the examination of more than 130 specimens, as well as beaks recovered from sperm whales, though there are recent scientific records of specimens that slightly exceed this size. Remeslo (2011) and Yukhov (2014:248) give a maximum mantle length of for females from southern waters. Questionable records of up to ML can be found in older literature. Paxton (2016a) accepts a maximum recorded ML of, based on the Lyall Bay specimen reported by Kirk (1880:312), but this record has been called into question as the gladius of this specimen was said to be only long.
Including the head and arms but excluding the tentacles, the species very rarely exceeds according to O'Shea & Bolstad (2008). Paxton (2016a) considers to be the greatest reliably measured SL, based on a specimen reported by Verrill (1880a:192), and considers specimens of SL or more to be "very probable", but these conclusions have been criticised by giant squid experts.
O'Shea (2003b) put the maximum weight of female giant squid at, based on the examination of some 105 specimens as well as beaks recovered from sperm whales. Giant squid are sexually size dimorphic, with the maximum weight for males estimated at, though heavier specimens have occasionally been reported. Similarly, Remeslo (2011) and Yukhov (2014:248) give maximum masses of and for females and males, respectively, based on records from southern latitudes. Roper & Jereb (2010:121) give a maximum weight of up to, and "possibly greater". Discredited weights of as much as a tonne or more are not uncommon in older literature.
The giant squid and the distantly related colossal squid are recognised as having by far the largest eyes of any living animal, and [Cephalopod size#Eyes|comparable to the largest eyes known from the fossil record]. Historical reports of "dinner plate–sized" eyes are largely corroborated by modern measurements, with an accepted maximum diameter of at least and a pupil.
Species identifications
The taxonomy of the giant squid genus Architeuthis has not been entirely resolved. Lumpers and splitters may propose as many as eight species or as few as one, with most authors recognising either one cosmopolitan species or three geographically disparate species: A. dux from the Atlantic, A. martensi from the North Pacific, and A. sanctipauli from the Southern Ocean. Historically, some twenty species names and eight genus names have been applied to architeuthids. No genetic or physical basis for distinguishing between the named species has been proposed, though specimens from the North Pacific do not appear to reach the maximum dimensions seen in giant squid from other areas. There may also be regional differences in the relative proportions of the tentacles and their sucker counts. The mitogenomic analysis of Winkelmann et al. (2013) supports the existence of a single, globally distributed species. The same conclusion was reached by Förch (1998) on the basis of morphological data.The literature on giant squid has been further muddied by the frequent misattribution of various squid specimens to the genus Architeuthis, often based solely on their large size. In the academic literature alone, such misidentifications encompass at least the oegopsid families Chiroteuthidae, Cranchiidae #Mhamiltoni1|# and List of giant squid specimens and sightings, Ommastrephidae, Onychoteuthidae #Orobusta1|#, List of giant squid specimens and sightings #Orobusta2|, and List of giant squid specimens and sightings, and Psychroteuthidae, with the familial identity of one record remaining unresolved. Many more misidentifications have been propagated in the popular press, involving—among others—Megalocranchia cf. fisheri, Thysanoteuthis rhombus, and an egg mass of Nototodarus gouldi. This situation is further confused by the occasional usage of the common name 'giant squid' in reference to large squids of other genera.
List of giant squid
Sourcing and progenitors
The present list generally follows "Records of Architeuthis Specimens from Published Reports", compiled by zoologist Michael J. Sweeney of the Smithsonian Institution and including records through 1999, with additional information taken from other sources. While Sweeney's list is sourced almost entirely from the scientific literature, many of the more recent specimens are supported by reports from the news media, including newspapers and magazines, radio and television broadcasts, and online sources.Earlier efforts to compile a list of all known giant squid encounters throughout history include those of marine writer and artist Richard Ellis. Ellis's first list, published as an appendix to his 1994 work Monsters of the Sea, was probably the first such compilation to appear in print and was described in the book's table of contents as "the most complete and accurate list of the historical sightings and strandings of Architeuthis ever attempted". Ellis's much-expanded second list, an appendix to his 1998 book The Search for the Giant Squid, comprised 166 entries spanning four and a half centuries, from 1545 to 1996. Records which appear in Ellis's 1998 list but are not found in Sweeney & Roper's 2001 list have a citation to Ellis (1998a)—in the page range 257–265—in the 'Additional references' column of the main table.
In addition to these global specimen lists, a number of regional compilations have been published, including Clarke & Robson (1929:156), Rees (1950:39–40) and Collins (1998) for the British Isles; Sivertsen (1955) for Norway; Aldrich (1991) for Newfoundland; Okiyama (1993) for the Sea of Japan; Förch (1998:105–110) for New Zealand; Guerra et al. (2006:258–259) for Asturias, Spain; #TMAG2007| for Tasmania, Australia; and Roper et al. (2015) for the western North Atlantic. Works exhaustively enumerating all recorded specimens from a particular mass appearance event include those of Verrill (1882c) for Newfoundland in 1870–1881 and Kubodera et al. (2016) for the Sea of Japan in 2014–2015. Though the number of authenticated giant squid records now runs [|into the hundreds], individual specimens still generate considerable scientific interest and continue to have scholarly papers unto themselves.
Scope and inclusion criteria
The list includes records of giant squid either supported by a physical specimen or—in the absence of any saved material—where at least one of the following conditions is satisfied: the specimen was examined by an expert prior to disposal and thereby positively identified as a giant squid; a photograph or video recording of the specimen was taken, on the basis of which it was assigned to the genus Architeuthis by a recognised authority; or the record was accepted as being that of a giant squid by a contemporary expert or later authority for any other reason, such as the perceived credibility of the source or the verisimilitude of the account.File:Giant squid attacking boat.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.14|Nineteenth century engraving by W. A. Cranston of a giant squid attacking a boat. Only sightings deemed authentic by published experts are included in the list.
Purported sightings of giant squid lacking both physical and documentary evidence and expert appraisal are generally excluded, with the exception of those appearing in the lists of Ellis (1994a:379–384), Ellis (1998a:257–265), or Sweeney & Roper (2001). In particular, "sea monster" sightings—many of which have been attributed to giant squid by various authors—fall short of this standard. Compositing and other forms of photo manipulation have been used to perpetrate hoaxes involving giant squid and these are occasionally circulated as records of actual news events, often accompanied by fictional background stories. Such records are likewise excluded, as are speculative misidentifications with no scientific basis.
The earliest surviving records of very large squid date to classical antiquity and the writings of Aristotle, Pliny the Elder, and possibly Antipater of Sidon. But in the absence of detailed descriptions or surviving remains, it is not possible to assign these to the giant squid genus Architeuthis with any confidence, and they are therefore not included in this list. Basque and Portuguese cod fishermen observed what were likely giant squid carcasses in the waters of the Grand Banks of Newfoundland as early as the 16th century, but conclusive evidence is similarly lacking. The earliest specimens identifiable as true giant squid are generally accepted to be ones from the early modern period in the 17th and 18th centuries, and possibly as far back as the 16th century.
All developmental stages from hatchling to mature adult are included. In the literature there is a single anecdotal account of a giant squid "egg case", but this is excluded due to a lack of substantiating evidence. Indirect evidence of giant squid—such as sucker scars found on sperm whales—falls outside the scope of this list.
Specimens misassigned to the genus Architeuthis in print publications or news reports are included, but are clearly highlighted as misidentifications.
List of specimens
Records are listed chronologically in ascending order and numbered accordingly. This numbering is not meant to be definitive but rather to provide a convenient means of referring to individual records. Specimens incorrectly assigned to the genus Architeuthis are counted separately, their numbers enclosed in square brackets, and are highlighted in pink. Records that cover multiple whole specimens, or remains necessarily originating from multiple individuals, have the 'Material cited' cell highlighted in grey. Animals that were photographed or filmed while alive have the 'Nature of encounter' cell highlighted in yellow. Where a record falls into more than one of these categories, a combination of shadings is used. Where an image of a specimen is available, this is indicated by a camera symbol that links to the image.File:Architeuthis princeps image modified.PNG|thumb|upright=1.85|Giant squid, modified from an illustration by Addison Emery Verrill, showing the exceptionally long feeding tentacles, which are often missing or damaged in recovered specimens. Some of the more extreme published giant squid measurements have been attributed to artificial lengthening of these tentacles. Almost the entire bulk of the animal—that is, the mantle, head, and arms—takes up less than half of its total length; the absence of the tentacles, therefore, has a great effect on the animal's total length but very little on its mass.
- Date – Date on which the specimen was first captured, found, or observed. Where this is unknown, the date on which the specimen was first reported is listed instead and noted as such. All times are local.
- Location – Area where the specimen was encountered, including coordinates and depth information where available. Given as it appears in the cited reference, except where additional information is provided in square brackets. The quadrant of a major ocean in which the specimen was found is given in curly brackets.
- ' – Circumstances in which the specimen was recovered or observed. Given as they appear in the cited reference, although "washed ashore" encompasses all stranded animals.
- Identification – Species- or genus-level taxon to which the specimen was assigned. Given as it appears in the cited reference. Listed chronologically if specimen was re-identified. These designations are primarily of historical interest as most authorities now recognise a single species of giant squid: Architeuthis dux. Where only a vernacular name has been applied to the specimen, this is given instead.
- ' – Original specimen material that was recovered or observed. "Entire" encompasses all more-or-less complete specimens. Names of anatomical features are retained from original sources. The specimen's state of preservation is also given, where known, and any missing parts enumerated.
- Material saved – Material that was kept after examination and not discarded. Information may be derived from outdated sources; material may no longer be extant even if stated as such.
- Sex – Sex and sexual maturity of the specimen.
- Size and measurements – Data relating to measurements and counts. Abbreviations used are based on standardised acronyms in teuthology, with the exception of several found in older references. [|Measurements] are given as they appear in the cited reference, with both arithmetic precision and original units preserved, though some of the more extreme lengths and weights found in older literature have since been discredited.
- Repository – Institution in which the specimen material is deposited, including accession numbers where available. Institutional acronyms are those defined by Leviton et al. (1985) and Leviton & Gibbs (1988). Where the acronym is unknown, the full repository name is listed. Type specimens, such as holotypes or syntypes, are identified as such in boldface. If an author has given a specimen a unique identifying number, this is included as well, whether or not the specimen is extant.
- Main references – The most important sources, typically ones that provide extensive data and/or analysis on a particular specimen. Presented in author–date parenthetical referencing style, with page numbers included where applicable. Only the first page of relevant coverage is given, except where this is discontinuous. Any relevant figures and plates are enumerated.
- ' – References of lesser importance or primacy, either because they provide less substantive information on a given record, or else because they are not easily obtainable or possibly even extant but nonetheless mentioned in more readily accessible published works.
- Notes – Miscellaneous information, often including persons and vessels involved in the specimen's recovery and subsequent handling, and any dissections, preservation work or scientific analyses carried out on the specimen. Where animals have been recorded while alive this is also noted. Material not referable to the genus Architeuthis, as well as specimens on public display, are both highlighted in bold, though the latter information may no longer be current.
| # | Date | Location | Nature of encounter | Identification | Material cited | Material saved | Sex | Size and measurements | Repository | Main references | Additional references | Notes |
| 1 | 1546 | Øresund, near Malmö, Denmark–Norway [since 1658 Malmö has been part of Sweden] | Found washed ashore; "caught live" | "sea monk"; Architeuthis monachus Steenstrup in Harting, 1860; Jenny Haniver made from a skate; Squatina squatina | Entire? | Undetermined | ?WL: ≈3 m | #Hamer1546|Hamer ; Belon (1553:38, fig.); Rondelet (1554:492, fig.); Belon (1555:32, fig.); Lycosthenes (1557:609, fig.); Gessner (1558:519, fig.); Rondelet (1558:361, fig.); Sluperius (1572:"89", 105, fig.); Vedel (1575); #Huitfeldt1595|Huitfeldt ; Gessner (1604:438, fig.); #Stephaniusc1650|Stephanius ; Steenstrup (1855a:63, 3 figs.); Roeleveld & Knudsen (1980:293, 3 figs.); Ellis (1998a:60, fig.); Paxton & Holland (2005:39, fig. 1) | records of Björn Jónsson á Skarðsá; Scheuchzer (1716:153); Holberg (1733:379); Lönnberg (1891:36); Nordgård (1928:71); Tambs-Lyche (1946:288); Carrington (1957:58, fig.); Muus (1959:170); Russell & Russell (1975:94); Strauss (1975:393, fig.); Aldrich (1980:55); Roeleveld () | Contemporaneously regarded as a "sea monk". Drawings of animal sent by Christian III of Denmark to Holy Roman Emperor Charles V sometime between 1545 and 1550; specimen well known across Europe. Mentioned in the writings of 16th century naturalists Pierre Belon, Guillaume Rondelet, and Conrad Gesner, though giant squid identity first proposed by Japetus Steenstrup in lecture on 26 November 1854. Paxton & Holland (2005:39) concluded that the specimen "was unlikely to have been a giant squid The most likely alternative suspect would be the angelshark Squatina squatina". The similar sea bishop has also been interpreted as a giant squid carcass or else a Jenny Haniver made from a skate. | ||
| 2 | autumn 1639 | Thingøre Sand, Nordresyssel, Iceland | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis sp. | Entire | One arm | BL+HL: ≈; AL: ≈; TL: ≈; BC: ≈ | Thingøre monastery; "museum at Copenhagen" | #Jonssonc1645|Jónsson ; Ólafsson (1772:716); #Steenstrup1849|Steenstrup ; #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ; Ellis (1998a:65) | Packard (1873:87); Verrill (1875b:84); Robson (1933:691); Muus (1959:170); Berger (2009:260) | Original Icelandic account is from the contemporaneous Annálar Björns á Skarðsá and has been translated into English. Crude drawing of animal mentioned by Eggert Ólafsson was lost with most of his books when his boat capsized off Iceland in 1768, leading to his death. Identified by Japetus Steenstrup as decapod cephalopod in 1849. | |
| 3 | 15 October 1673 | Dingle-I-cosh, Kerry, Ireland | Found floating at surface, in process of washing ashore, alive | Dinoteuthis proboscideus More, 1875; Architeuthis monachus; Ommastrephes ''monachus | Entire | Two arms, buccal mass, and suckers taken to Dublin | TL: ≈ + ; AL: ≈; "liver": | Undetermined ; holotype of Dinoteuthis proboscideus More, 1875 | #Anonc1673| ; #Hookeetalc1674|Hooke et al. ; More (1875a:4526); Verrill (1875c:214); Tryon (1879b:185); Ellis (1998a:66); Sueur-Hermel (2017:64) | More (1875b:4571); Massy (1909:30); Ritchie (1918:137); Robson (1933:692); Rees (1950:40); Hardy (1956:285); Collins (1998:489) | Found by James Steward. Original material relating to this specimen consists of: a broadsheet printed in London with three letters together with a description and illustration; a fourth letter in manuscript; a broadsheet printed in Dublin to be distributed as a handbill; and an eight-page booklet printed in London with a woodcut reproduction of the illustration in the broadsheet. | |
| 4 | 1680 | Ulvangen Fjord, Alstadhoug parish, Norway | Not stated | Entire? | Pontoppidan (1753:344) | #Steenstrup1857|Steenstrup ; Grieg (1933:19) | ||||||
| 5 | 1770 | Jutland, Denmark | Unknown | Muss (1959) | Ellis (1998a:257) | |||||||
| 6 | 27 May 1785 | Grand Banks, Newfoundland | Found floating at surface, dead | Architeuthis sp. | BL: | Cartwright (1792:44); #Thomas1795|Thomas ; Aldrich (1991:457) | Found during George Cartwright's sixth and final voyage to Newfoundland and Labrador. Spotted at 10 am surrounded by birds. Head broke off during retrieval. Described as "a large squid when gutted, the body filled a pork barrel, and the whole of it would have filled a tierce". | |||||
| 7 | November or December 1790 | Arnarnaesvik, Modruvalle, Iceland | Found washed ashore | Entire | None; used for cod bait | "longest tentacula": >; "body right from the head": ; "so thick that a fullgrown man could hardly embrace it with his arms" | #Steenstrup1849|Steenstrup ; #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ; Ellis (1998a:68) | February 1792 diary of Sveinn Pálsson ; Verrill (1875b:84); Robson (1933:691) | Called Kolkrabbe by local people. Identified by Japetus Steenstrup as decapod cephalopod in 1849. | |||
| 8 | 1700s | Freshwater Bay, near mouth of St. John's harbour, Newfoundland | Unknown | Architeuthis sp. | #Thomas1795|Thomas ; Aldrich (1991:457) | |||||||
| 9 | 1700s | Grand Banks, Newfoundland | Unknown | Architeuthis sp. | Aldrich (1991:457) | |||||||
| 10 | 1798 | north coast of Denmark | Not stated | "gigantic squid" | Unknown | "museum at Copenhagen" | Packard (1873:87) | Ellis (1998a:257) | ||||
| 11 | 9 January 1802 | off Tasmania, Australia | Found at surface, alive | ?Loligo "] | "size of a barrel" ; AL: 1.9–2.2 m; AD: 18–21 cm | Péron (1807:216) | Quoy & Gaimard (1824:411); Ellis (1998a:257) | Péron (1807:216) wrote: "it rolled with noise in the midst of the waves, and its long arms, stretched out on their surface, stirred like so many enormous reptiles". | ||||
| 12 | between 1817 and 1820 | Atlantic Ocean, near equator | Found floating at surface | "énorme calmar" | Partial remains; "tentacles" missing | WT: 100 "livres" ; WT: 200 "livres" | Quoy & Gaimard (1824:411) | Packard (1873:88); Ellis (1998a:257) | Found at surface in calm weather. Quoy & Gaimard (1824:411) opined: "it is easy to imagine that one of these terrible molluscs could readily remove a man from a fairly large boat, but not a medium-tonnage vessel, still less tilting this vessel and endangering it, as some would like to believe". | |||
| 13 | December 1853 | Raabjerg beach, North [Denmark Region|North Jutland], coast of Skagerack, Denmark | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis monachus | Entire | Jaws only; radula discarded after poor preservation; jaws cut out; portion used for bait; remainder buried after 2 days | WT: 80–85 kg; jaw measurements #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup | ZMUC catalog no. CEP-133; holotype of Architeuthis monachus Steenstrup, 1857 | #Steenstrup1855b|Steenstrup ; Harting (1860:11); #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ; Kristensen & Knudsen (1983:222) | #Steenstrup1857|Steenstrup ; Packard (1873:87); Gervais (1875:91); Verrill (1875b:84); Verrill (1880a:238, pl. 25 fig. 3); Verrill (1882c:51, pl. 12 fig. 3); Posselt (1890:144); Nordgård (1928:71) | "Architeuthis monachus" Steenstrup = nomen nudum | |
| 14 | 5 November 1855 | western Atlantic Ocean, near Bahamas | Not stated; presumably found floating at surface | Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857; Architeuthis titan | Various parts | Gladius, mouthparts, part of arm, several suckers, and what may be hectocotylus | Male | WL: 377 cm; AL: 1/2 whole length; beak measurements; GL: | ZMUC catalog no. CEP-97 and NHMD-77320 ; holotype of Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857; ZMB Moll. 34798 ; piece of limb in Bergen Museum | #Steenstrup1857|Steenstrup ; #Steenstrup1882|Steenstrup ; #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ; Tryon (1879b:186, pl. 86 fig. 388); Kristensen & Knudsen (1983:222); Glaubrecht & Salcedo-Vargas (2000:273); #NHMD2019| | Packard (1873:87); Verrill (1875b:84); Posselt (1890:144); Toll & Hess (1981:753) | Obtained by Capt. Vilhelm Hygom. Japetus Steenstrup donated single sucker to Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, which was incorporated into collection in 1883 according to catalogue entry. Preserved in 70% ethanol. |
| 15 | December 1855 | Aalbaekbugten, Denmark | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis sp. | Entire? | Undetermined | - | Muus (1959:170) | Posselt (1890:144) | |||
| 16 | Unknown | Unknown | Not stated | Architeuthis dux;?Ommastrephes hartingii; Architeuthis hartingii ; nomen nudum | Jaws, buccal mass, detached arm suckers | Jaws, buccal mass, detached arm suckers | ASD: | Utrecht University Natural History Museum; holotype of Loligo hartingii Verrill, 1875. Harting specimen No. 1 | Harting (1860:2, pl. 1); Kent (1874d:491); Verrill (1875b:85, fig. 28); Tryon (1879b:149, 184, pl. 60 figs. 194–195); Verrill (1880a:240, pl. 16 fig. 8, pl. 25 fig. 1); Verrill (1882c:52, pl. 12 figs. 1–1c); Pfeffer (1912:37) | Dell (1970:27) | ||
| 17 | 1860 or 1861 | between Hillswick and Scalloway, Shetland, Scotland | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis monachus Steenstrup, 1857; Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 | Undetermined | TL: ; AL: ≈; BL: ≈ | Jeffreys (1869:124); Stephen (1944:263) | More (1875b:4571); Pfeffer (1912:26); Rees (1950:40); Collins (1998:489) | ||||
| 18 | 30 November ?1861 | about northeast of Teneriffe, Canary Islands | Found floating at surface | Loligo bouyeri;?Ommastrephes bouyeri | Entire, decomposed | - | BL: | - | Bouyer (1861:1263); Crosse & Fischer (1862:135); Bouyer (1866:275, fig.); Kent (1874a:180); Verrill (1875b:86); Tryon (1879b:149, 184, pl. 59); Bourée (1912:113, fig. 108); Aldrich (1978:2); Ellis (1998a:5, 78); Heuvelmans (2003:185, figs. 95–96, 100) | Frédol (1865:314, pl. 13); Figuier (1866:464, fig. 362); Frédol (1866:362); Mangin (1868:321); Meunier (1871:245); Kent (1874d:491); Gervais (1875:93); Lee (1883:38, fig. 8); Rees & Maul (1956:266); Carrington (1957:53, pl. 3b); Muntz (1995:19, fig. 11); Lagrange (2009:19) | Observed only by officers of the French gunboat Alecton; sketch made. A report of the incident filed by the ship's lieutenant was almost certainly seen by Jules Verne and adapted by him for the description of the monstrous squid in Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas. Iconography discussed by Lagrange (2009). | |
| 19 | 1862 | North Atlantic | Unknown | Crosse & Fischer (1862) | Ellis (1998a:258) | |||||||
| Unknown; 1870? | Cape Sable, Nova Scotia, Canada | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis megaptera Verrill, 1878 | Entire | Entire | BL: ; BL+HL: ; EL: ; TL: ; AL: ; FW: ; FL: ; extensive additional measurements | NSMC catalog no. 1870-Z-2; YPM catalog nos. & ; holotype of Architeuthis megaptera Verrill, 1878; Verrill specimen No. 21 | Verrill (1878:207); Tryon (1879b:187); Verrill (1880a:193, pl. 21); Verrill (1882c:17, pl. 16 figs. 1–9) | Non-architeuthid. Collected by J.M. Jones. | |||
| 20 | September 1870 | Waimarama, east coast of Wellington, New Zealand | Found washed ashore | Entire | Beak | BL+HL: ; BC: ; AL: | In Kirk's possession; Kirk specimen No. 1 | Kirk (1880:310); Verrill (1881b:398) | Meinertzhagen letter 27 June 1879 to Kirk; Pfeffer (1912:32); Dell (1952:98) | Mr. Meinertzhagen sent beak, saved by third party, to Kirk. Natives called specimen a "taniwha". | ||
| 21 | 1870 | Lamaline, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis monachus of Steenstrup | Two specimens; entire? | None?; used as fish bait | Two; EL: and EL: | None?; Verrill specimen Nos. 8 & 9 | Murray (1874a:162); Verrill (1875a:36); Verrill (1880a:187); Verrill (1882c:11) | Boston Traveller, November 1873; Harvey (1874a:69); Kent (1874a:182); Frost (1934:101); Earle (1977:52) | Data from Mr. Harvey letter citing Rev. M. Gabriel's statement to Harvey. | |
| 22 | October 1871 | Grand Banks, Newfoundland | Found floating at surface | Architeuthis princeps Verrill, 1875 | Entire; part used as bait | Jaws obtained from Baird for examination by Verrill | BL: ≈; BD: ; AL: ≈ ; AD: ; AC: ; beak; BC: ; WT: | Jaws at NMNH ; lower jaw is syntype of Architeuthis princeps Verrill, 1875b; Verrill specimen No. 1 | Packard (1873:91); Verrill (1874a:158); Verrill (1874b:167); Verrill (1875b:79, fig. 27); Verrill (1880a:181, 210, pl. 18 fig. 3); Verrill (1882c:5, pl. 11 figs. 3–3a) | Pfeffer (1912:20); Frost (1934:100) | Taken by Capt. Campbell, Schooner B.D. Haskins. | |
| 23 | 1871 | Wellington, New Zealand | ?EL: | Dell (1952) | Ellis (1998a:258) | |||||||
| 24 | 1872 | Coomb's Cove, Fortune Bay, Newfoundland | Found alive in shallow water, having been driven ashore in heavy sea | Entire; "one long arm missing" | BL: ; BD: ; TL: ; AL: ≈; AD: ; skin + flesh: thick; EL: | Unknown; Verrill specimen No. 3 | Verrill (1874a:159); Verrill (1874b:167); Verrill (1875a:35); Verrill (1880a:183); Verrill (1882c:7) | Owen (1881:163); Frost (1934:101) | Specimen had a reddish colour. Verrill's data taken from newspaper accounts and 15/VI/1873 T.R. Bennett letter to Prof. Baird. Verrill (1880a:186) states his No. 6 is same specimen as No. 3; this cannot be correct, since capture date for No. 6 is clearly stated as December 1874 by Verrill (1875c:213). | |||
| 25 | December 1872 | Bonavista Bay, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | ?Architeuthis dux;?Architeuthis harveyi | Entire | Pair of jaws and two suckers | TL: ; AL: ≈; BL: ≈ ; BC: | NMNH; YPM catalog no. . Verrill specimen No. 4 (1875a:33); and possibly also Verrill specimen No. 11 (1875b:79) | Verrill (1874a:160); Verrill (1874b:167); Verrill (1875a:33, fig. 11); Verrill (1875b:79); Verrill (1880a:184, 187, pl. 16 figs. 5–6, pl. 25 fig. 5); Verrill (1882c:8, 11, pl. 3 figs. 4–4a, pl. 4 figs. 1–1a) | Pfeffer (1912:19); Frost (1934:101) | Material from Rev. A. Munn, through Prof. Baird to Verrill. | |
| 26 | Unknown | North Atlantic Ocean | From sperm whale stomach | Architeuthis princeps Verrill, 1875; Ommastrephes ''princeps | Upper and lower jaws | Upper and lower jaws | Beak measurements | Presented by Capt. N.E. Atwood of Provincetown, Massachusetts to EI; PASS; syntype of Architeuthis princeps Verrill, 1875b; Verrill specimen No. 10 | Packard (1873:91, fig. 10); Verrill (1875a:22); Verrill (1875b:79, figs. 25–26); Tryon (1879b:185, pl. 85); Verrill (1880a:187, 210, pl. 18 figs. 1–2); Verrill (1882c:11, pl. 11 figs. 1–2) | Frost (1934:101) | First reported by Alpheus Spring Packard in February 1873. Verrill states Packard's illustration is inaccurate. | |
| 27 | Unknown | Unknown; possibly east coast of South America ? | Not stated | Architeuthis monachus; Plectoteuthis grandis Owen, 1881; Architeuthis sp.? ; nomen nudum | Sessile arm | Arm | AL: ; AC: ; ASD: ≤; total size and size of various missing parts estimated by Lee (1875:114) | BMNH; holotype of Plectoteuthis grandis Owen, 1881 | Kent (1874a:179); Kent (1874d:493); Lee (1875:113); Verrill (1875b:86); Owen (1881:156, pls. 34–35); Verrill (1881b:400); Verrill (1882b:72); #Steenstrup1882|Steenstrup ; Pfeffer (1912:37) | Dell (1970:27) | "No history relating to it has been preserved", but first examined by Henry Lee in May 1873, having been in BMNH collections for "long" time. Bore 300 suckers. | |
| 28 | 1873 | Yedo [Tokyo] fishmarket, Japan | Purchased | Megateuthis martensii Hilgendorf, 1880; Nomen spurium | 'Entire', missing head, "abdominal sac", ends of tentacles and arms | Not specified | ML: 186 cm; WL: 414 cm; HL: 41 cm; AL: 197 cm ; ASD: 1.5 cm ; EyD: 200 mm | ZMB Moll. 34716 + 38980; holotype of Megateuthis martensii Hilgendorf, 1880 | Hilgendorf (1880:67); Pfeffer (1912:31); Sasaki (1929:227); Glaubrecht & Salcedo-Vargas (2000:276) | Owen (1881:163); Sasaki (1916:90) | Second specimen from Tokyo fishmarket seen by Franz Martin Hilgendorf and used for description of gladius. Of other specimen, Hilgendorf saved "parts of an arm, the covering of the eye, and a fragment of the gladius". Model of specimen placed in Exhibition of Fishery in Berlin. | |
| 29 | 26 October 1873 | off Portugal Cove, Conception Bay, Newfoundland | Found floating at surface, alive | Megaloteuthis harveyi Kent, 1874; Architeuthis monachus of Steenstrup;?Architeuthis harveyi | Entire | One tentacle; one arm discarded | TL: ; TC: ; TSD: ; additional measurements based on photograph; additional club measurement from Harvey letter; BL: ≈; EL: ≈ ; AL: ; AD: ; TSC: ≈180; beak as large "as a six-gallon keg"; "tail" across | YPM?; holotype of Megaloteuthis harveyi Kent, 1874; Verrill specimen No. 2 | Harvey (1873a); Harvey (1873b); Harvey (1873c); Harvey (1874a:67, fig.); Murray (1874a:161); Murray (1874b:120); Verrill (1874a:159); Verrill (1874b:167); Kent (1874a:178, 182); Agassiz (1874:226); Kent (1874d:32); Buckland (1875:211); Verrill (1875a:34); Verrill (1875b:78); Verrill (1880a:181); Verrill (1881b:pl. 26 fig. 5); Verrill (1882b:74); Verrill (1882c:5, pl. 4 figs. 3–3a); Hatton & Harvey (1883:238); Harvey (1899:732, fig.); Ellis (1998a:81); Haslam (2017) | "13 December Field"; #Anon1873| ; Harvey (1873d:2); #Anon1874| ; de La Blanchère (1874:197, fig.); Rathbun (1881:266, fig.); Owen (1881:161, pl. 33 fig. 2); Lee (1883:42, fig. 9); #Anon1902b| ; Pfeffer (1912:19); Frost (1934:100); Aldrich (1991:457); Packham (1998); Dery (2013) | Struck by Theophilus Picot from boat whereupon it "attacked" the boat; veracity of account has been questioned. Severed tentacle purchased by Moses Harvey for NF$10 and preserved in alcohol; exhibited at Alexander Murray's geological museum in St. John's, where it remained as of 1883. Famed naturalist Louis Agassiz showed great interest in the specimen, writing: "It is truly important for the history of cephalopods"; his final scientific letters concerned the possibility of examining its remains. Served as a reference for the earliest known "life-sized" giant squid cutout, from the 1870s. Considered by Paxton (2016a:83) as the "longest visually estimated" total length of any giant squid specimen. Encounter dramatised in episode of 1998 documentary series The X Creatures; fictionalised in The Adventures of Billy Topsail by Norman Duncan and The Kraken by Don C. Reed. A similar event is portrayed in The Shipping News by E. Annie Proulx. | |
| 30 | 25 November? 1873 | Logy Bay, Newfoundland | In herring net | ?Architeuthis monachus of Steenstrup; Ommastrephes monachus; Architeuthis harveyi | Entire | Miscellaneous parts obtained from Rev. M. Harvey | BL: ≈; BC: ; HC: ; caudal fin: broad; TL: ; TC: ; TSD: ; AL: ; AC:,,, ; ASC: ≈100; CSC: ≈160; EyD: ; club description; extensive description of reconstructed parts | YPM catalog nos. , , , & . Verrill specimen No. 5 | Harvey (1873d:2); Verrill (1874a:160); Verrill (1874b:167); Kent (1874a:181); Kent (1874d:32); Buckland (1875:212, 214); Verrill (1875a:22, figs. 1–6, 10); Verrill (1876:236); Tryon (1879b:184, pls. 83–84); Verrill (1880a:184, 197, pls. 13–15, pl. 16 figs. 1–4, pl. 16a); Verrill (1880b:295, pl. 13); Verrill (1882c:8, pls. 1–2, pl. 3 figs. 1–3, pl. 4 figs. 4–11, pl. 5 figs. 1–5); Hatton & Harvey (1883:240); Harvey (1899:735, fig.); Pfeffer (1912:18); Aldrich (1991:457, fig. 1A, B); Haslam (2017) | Harvey in Morning Chronicle of St. John's; Maritime Monthly Magazine of St. John's, March 1874; several other newspapers; #Anon1874| ; Lee (1883:43, fig. 10); #Anon1902b| ; Frost (1934:101) | Verrill's data from letter to Dr. Dawson from Moses Harvey. Harvey purchased specimen for NF$10 entire body, somewhat mutilated anteriorly; b) head and 10 limbs. Poorly preserved; first in brine, then in alcohol. Capture date given as December several times, then as November several times, and as 25 November by Aldrich (1991:457). Served as a reference for the earliest known "life-sized" giant squid cutout, from the 1870s. Verrill's description served as the basis for the "life-sized" model that now hangs at the Peabody Museum of Natural History, built in 1966, though it was also based on several Newfoundland specimens from the 1960s. Specimen and famous photograph of it draped over Harvey's shower curtain rod were subject of Preparing the Ghost, a work of creative nonfiction by Matthew Gavin Frank. | |
| 31 | 1874 | Buøy, Foldenfjord, Norway | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis dux | Entire | - | WL: ≈4 m | Grieg (1933:19) | Nordgård (1928:71) | |||
| 32 | 10 May 1874 | off Trincomalee, Sri Lanka | Reportedly seen sinking ship | Unknown | The Times, 4 July 1874; Mystic Press, 31 July 1874; Lane (1957:205); Flynn & Weigall (1980); Ellis (1998a:198); Boyle (1999); Uragoda (2005:97) | Welfare & Fairley (1980:74); Aldrich (1990a:5); Clarke (1992:72); Ellis (1998a:258) | Schooner Pearl with crew of six, including captain James Floyd, supposedly sunk by giant squid. Incident reportedly seen from passenger steamer Strathowen, bound from Colombo to Madras, which rescued five of the crew. Veracity of account has been questioned, though taken seriously by Frederick Aldrich. Fictionalised in Don C. Reed's 1995 novel The Kraken. | |||||
| 33 | 2 November 1874 | on beach, St. Paul Island, Indian Ocean | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis mouchezi Vélain (1875:1002) ; Mouchezis sancti-pauli Vélain (1877:81); Ommastrephes mouchezi | Entire; found in advanced state of decay | Tentacle and buccal mass | EL: 7.15 m | MNHN catalog nos. 3-2-658 & 3-2-659 ; holotype of Mouchezis sancti-pauli Vélain, 1877 | Vélain (1875:1002); Vélain (1877:81 & 83, fig. 8); Vélain (1878:81 & 83, fig. 8); Tryon (1879b:184, pl. 82 fig. 378); Owen (1881:159); Pfeffer (1912:32) | Gervais (1875:88); Verrill (1875c:213); Wright (1878:329) | Recorded by geologist Charles Vélain during French astronomical mission to Île Saint-Paul to observe the transit of Venus. Specimen was photographed. | |
| 34 | December 1874 | Grand Bank, Fortune Bay, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis princeps | Entire, except for tail | Jaws, one tentacular sucker | EL: ; HL+BL: ; ?TL: ; TL: ; TC: ; BL: ; jaws | YPM catalog nos. & . Verrill specimen No. 6 and Verrill specimen No. 13 | Verrill (1875a:35); Verrill (1875c:213); Verrill (1880a:186, 188, 217, pl. 17 fig. 11); Verrill (1881b:445, pl. 54 fig. 1); Verrill (1882c:10, 12, pl. 7 fig. 1, pl. 9 fig. 11) | Simms letter 27/X/1875 to Verrill; Frost (1934:102) | Data from 10/XII/1873 letter from Mr. Harvey to unknown individual citing measurements taken by G. Simms; Pfeffer (1912:21). Measurements are given differently in different papers. Verrill (1880a:186) and Verrill (1882c:10) states his No. 6 is same specimen as No. 3; this cannot be correct, as capture date for No. 6 is clearly stated as December 1874 by Verrill (1875c:213). Verrill (1880a:188, pl. 17) repeats record as his No. 13. | |
| 35 | winter of 1874–1875 | near Harbor Grace, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | Destroyed | None taken | None; Verrill specimen No. 12 | Verrill (1875b:79); Verrill (1880a:188); Verrill (1882c:12) | Frost (1934:102) | "destroyed before its value became known, and no measurements are given" | |||
| 36 | Unknown | west St. Modent, Strait of Belle Isle, Newfoundland | Found alive | Architeuthis princeps or Architeuthis monachus of Steenstrup | Entire | None; cut up, salted, and barrelled for dog meat | ?TL: ; BL+HL: ; EL: ; SD: ≈ | None; Verrill specimen No. 7 | Verrill (1875a:36); Verrill (1880a:186); Verrill (1882c:10) | Dr. Honeyman article in Halifax newspaper; Frost (1934:101) | Data from unidentified third party cited in Halifax newspaper article. | |
| 37 | 25 April 1875 | north-west of Boffin Island, Connemara, Ireland | Found immobile at surface; attacked and chased by fishermen; arms successively hacked off and eventually killed | Architeuthis monachus; Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 | Entire | Beak and buccal mass, one arm, portions of both tentacles ; head, eyes and second arm initially saved, but soon lost/destroyed | TL: ; TL: 14/17 ft ; CL: ; CSD: nearly ; SSD: ; AL: ; AC: ; beak: ≈ × ; "trunk": "fully as long as the canoe"; EyD: ≈; WT: ≈ ; additional sucker measurements | NMI catalog no. 1995.16 | O'Connor (1875:4502); More (1875b:4569); More (1875c:123); Verrill (1875c:214); Massy (1909:30); Nunn & Holmes (2008) | Galway Express 1875; Ritchie (1918:137); Massy (1928:32); Taylor (1932:3); Robson (1933:692); Rees (1950:40); Hardy (1956:285); Collins (1998:489) | On public display. Caught by three-man longline fishing crew of currach for use as bait for coarse fish. Found motionless at surface surrounded by gulls, becoming active upon being attacked by fishermen, swimming away "at a tremendous rate" and releasing ink. Progressively disabled with a knife as chased for 2 hours over, before head eventually severed; heavy mantle allowed to sink. Specimen secured and preserved by Sergeant Thomas O'Connor of the Royal Irish Constabulary and forwarded by him to the museum of the Royal [Dublin Society], Dublin. | |
| 38 | October 1875 | Grand Banks , Atlantic Ocean | Found floating at surface; "mostly entirely dead" but small minority "not quite dead, but entirely disabled" | Architeuthis | Multiple; mutilated by birds and fishes to varying degrees, especially limbs; No. 25 missing parts of arms; No. 26 with intact arms and tentacles | None; cut up for cod bait | No. 25: Filled ≈ tub; WT: nearly ; No. 26: TL: ; Howard specimens: BL+HL?: mostly ; BD: ≈ ; AL: usually ; AD: "about as large as a man's thigh" ; Tragabigzanda specimens: BL+HL?: | None; included Verrill specimen No. 25 and Verrill specimen No. 26 | Verrill (1881a:251); Verrill (1881b:396); Verrill (1882c:19) | Frost (1934:103) | An unusual number of mostly dead giant squid found by Gloucester, Massachusetts fishermen, with similar number estimated to have been obtained by vessels from other areas. Data from Capt. J.W. Collins of the United States Fish Commission, who at the time of the incident commanded schooner Howard, which collected five specimens. Other involved vessels included schooner Sarah P. Ayer, which took 1–2 specimens; E. R. Nickerson, which harpooned one with intact arms that was "not entirely dead"; and schooner Tragabigzanda, which took three in one afternoon. Some fishermen stated that such "big squids" were also common at the Flemish Cap during the same season. Verrill conjectured that this mass mortality might have been due to an outbreak of disease or parasites, and/or related to their reproductive cycle. | |
| 39 | 1876 | Clifford Bay, Cape Campbell, New Zealand | Found washed ashore | Entire | Jaws | BL: ; EL: ≈ | Colonial Museum | Robson (1887:156); Kirk (1880) | Pfeffer (1912:32); Dell (1952:98) | |||
| 40 | 20 November 1876 | Hammer Cove, southwest arm of Green Bay, Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | Partial specimen; devoured by foxes and seabirds | Piece of pen long | WH: ; FW: | In Harvey's possession; Verrill specimen No. 15 | Verrill (1880a:190); Verrill (1880b:284); Verrill (1882c:14) | M. Harvey letter 25 August 1877 to Verrill; Frost (1934:102) | |||
| 41 | 1877? | Norway | Not stated | Map location only | Sivertsen (1955:11, fig. 4) | |||||||
| 42 | 24 September 1877 | Catalina, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore, alive | Architeuthis princeps; Ommastrephes princeps | Entire; "nearly perfect specimen" | Loose suckers | HL+BL: ; BC: ; TL: ; AL: ; AC: ; beak; FW: | YPM catalog nos. , , & . Verrill specimen No. 14 | Harvey (1877); #Anon1877a| ; #Anon1877b| ; #Anon1877c| ; Verrill (1877:425); Tryon (1879b:185); Verrill (1880a:189, pl. 17 figs. 1–10, pls. 19–20); Verrill (1880b:295, pl. 12); Verrill (1882c:13, pl. 8, pl. 9 figs. 1–10, pl. 10) | Owen (1881:163); Hatton & Harvey (1883:242); Pfeffer (1912:21); Frost (1934:102); Miner (1935:187, fig., 201); Ellis (1997a:31) | Measured fresh by M. Harvey; examined preserved by Verrill at New York Aquarium. Later "prepared" for exhibition by taxidermist. Served as the basis for the earliest "life-sized" giant squid models, including the original three made by Verrill and J. H. Emerton and six subsequent ones by Ward's. Described by Frederick Aldrich as "largest giant squid to be encountered in Newfoundland". | |
| 43 | October 1877 | Trinity Bay, Newfoundland | Not stated | "big squid" | - | None taken | None; Verrill specimen No. 17 | Verrill (1880a:191); Verrill (1880b:285); Verrill (1882c:15) | M. Harvey letter 17 November 1877 to Verrill citing reference to specimen by John Duffet; Frost (1934:102) | Specimen cut up and used for manure. | ||
| 44 | 21 November 1877 | Smith's Sound, Lance Cove, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore, alive | ?Architeuthis princeps | Entire | None; carried off by tide | BL: ; TL: ; AL: | None; Verrill specimen No. 16 | Verrill (1880a:190); Verrill (1880b:285); Verrill (1882c:14) | M. Harvey letter 27 November 1877 to Verrill citing measurements taken by John Duffet; Frost (1934:102) | Found still alive, having "ploughed up a trench or furrow about long and of considerable depth by the stream of water that it ejected with great force from its siphon. When the tide receded it died." | |
| 1878 | Catlins, New Zealand | Not stated | Architeuthis sp. | Entire? | Beak | BL: ; ML: 1.6 m ; EL: ≈10 m | Otago Museum catalog no. IV119151 | Lau (2021); #OM2021| | Copedo (2022) | On public display. Collected by Capt. Charles Hayward. Acquired in 1878 by Capt. Frederick Wollaston Hutton, first curator of Otago Museum, according to museum records; rediscovered and publicised in 2021. Placed on display in Animal Attic gallery. Mantle and total length estimated by teuthologist Kat Bolstad based on beak measurements. | ||
| 45 | 2 November 1878 | Thimble Tickle, near Little Bay Copper Mine, Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland | Found aground offshore, alive; secured to tree with grapnel and rope; died as tide receded | ?Architeuthis princeps | Entire | None; cut up for dog food | BL+HL: ; TL: | None; Verrill specimen No. 18 | Verrill (1880a:191); Verrill (1880b:285); Verrill (1882c:15); Ellis (1998a:6, 89, 107) | M. Harvey letter 30 January 1879 to Boston Traveller; Hatton & Harvey (1883:242); Holder (1885:165, pl. 25); Frost (1934:102); Carberry (2001); Harvey (2004); Hickey (2009); Paxton (2016a:83) | Discovered by fisherman Stephen Sherring and two others. Often cited as the largest recorded giant squid specimen, and long treated as such by Guinness. Considered by Paxton (2016a:83) as candidate for "longest measured" total length of any giant squid specimen. Giant Squid Interpretation Centre and "life-sized", 55-foot sculpture built near site of capture; sculpture appeared on Canadian postage stamp issued in 2011 and has associated annual festival. | |
| 46 | 2 December 1878 | Three Arms, South Arm of Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | ?Architeuthis princeps | Entire, mutilated and with arms missing | None; cut up for dog food | BL+HL: ; BC: ; AL: ; AD: "thicker than a man's thigh" | None; Verrill specimen No. 19 | Verrill (1880a:192); Verrill (1880b:286); Verrill (1882c:16) | M. Harvey letter 30 January 1879 to Boston Traveller; Hatton & Harvey (1883:242); Frost (1934:102); Paxton (2016a:83) | Found dead by fisherman William Budgell after heavy gale. Considered by Paxton (2016a:83) as the "longest measured" standard length of any giant squid specimen. | |
| 47 | 23 May 1879 | Lyall Bay, Cook Strait, New Zealand | Found washed ashore | Steenstrupia stockii Kirk, 1882 | Entire, but somewhat mutilated; missing ends of tentacles | Pen, beak, tongue, some suckers | ML: ; BC: ; HL: ; BL+HL: ; HC: ; AL: ; AC: ; ASC: 36; TL: ; FL: ; FW: ; GL: ; GW: ; other measurements | NMNZ catalog nos. M.125403 & M.125405; holotype of Steenstrupia stockii Kirk, 1882. Kirk specimen No. 3 | Kirk (1880:310); Verrill (1881b:398); Kirk (1882:286, pl. 36 figs. 2–4) | Verrill (1882d:477); Kirk (1888:34); Pfeffer (1912:34); Suter (1913:1051); Dell (1952:98); Dell (1970:27); Stevens (1980:213, fig. 12.24); Stevens (1988:149, fig. 2); Judd (1996); Paxton (2016a:83); Greshko (2016) | Measurements taken by T.W. Kirk. Has been called the "largest specimen recorded in the scientific literature" based on erroneous total length of "approximately 20 m", itself based on claim by Roper & Boss (1982:104) relating to unspecified specimen "stranded on a beach in New Zealand in 1880 ". Considered by Paxton (2016a:83) as the longest reliably measured mantle length of any giant squid specimen, but measurement considered dubious by experts due to wide discrepancy with reported gladius length. | |
| 48 | 1879 | off Nova Scotia, Canada | From fish stomach, Alepisaurus ferox|Alepidosaurus ferox | ?Architeuthis megaptera Verrill, 1878; ?Architeuthis harveyi | Terminal part of tentacular arm | Portion of arm | long | NMNH catalog no. 576962. Verrill specimen No. 20 | Verrill (1880a:193); Verrill (1880b:287); Verrill (1882c:16) | Frost (1934:103) | Lancetfish taken by Capt. J.W. Collins of schooner Marion on halibut trawl-line. | |
| 49 | September 1879 | Olafsfjord, Iceland | Architeuthis | Left tentacle | TL: 7680+ mm; CL: 1010 mm; CSC: 268; TSC: 290; additional indices and counts | ZMUC | Roeleveld (2002:727) | Tentacle morphology examined by Roeleveld (2002). | ||||
| 50 | October 1879 | near Brigus, Conception Bay, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | Two arms with other mutilated parts | Undetermined | AL: | None?; Verrill specimen No. 22 | Verrill (1880a:194); Verrill (1880b:287); Verrill (1882c:17) | Frost (1934:103) | Found after storm. Information provided by Moses Harvey. | ||
| 51 | 1 November 1879 | James's Cove, Bonavista Bay, Newfoundland | Found at surface, alive | Entire | None; cut up by fishermen | EL: ; BL: ; BC: ≈; TL: | None; Verrill specimen No. 23 | Verrill (1880a:194); Verrill (1880b:287); Verrill (1882c:17) | Morning Chronicle of St. John's 9 December 1879; Frost (1934:103) | Found alive and driven ashore. | ||
| 52 | Unknown | near Boulder Bank, Nelson, New Zealand | Not stated; hook and line? | Not indicated | Undetermined | long | None?; Kirk specimen No. 4 | Kirk (1880:310); Verrill (1881b:398) | Newspaper article | Caught by fishing party. No other data. | ||
| 53 | Unknown | near Flat Point, east coast, New Zealand | Not stated | Not indicated | Undetermined | - | None?; Kirk specimen No. 5 | Kirk (1880:310); Verrill (1881b:398) | Description sent to Mr. Beetham, M.H.R., by Mr. Moore | Found by Mr. Moore. No other data. | ||
| 54 | April 1880 | Grand Banks, Newfoundland | Found dead at surface | Architeuthis harveyi | Head, tentacles, and arms only | Head, tentacles, and arms | TL: ; ASC: 330; extensive measurements and counts | YPM catalog no. 12600y. Verrill specimen No. 24 | Verrill (1881b:259, pl. 26 figs. 1–4, pl. 38 figs. 3–7); Verrill (1882c:18, pl. 4 figs. 2–2a, pl. 5 figs. 6–8, pl. 6) | Pfeffer (1912:19); Frost (1934:103) | Found dead by Capt. O.A. Whitten of schooner Wm.H. Oakes. Arm and sucker regeneration documented by Verrill (1881b:260); one of two published records of limb regeneration in architeuthids, the other being a case of tentacle regeneration in #169. | |
| 55 | 6 June 1880 | Island Bay, Cook Strait, New Zealand | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis verrilli Kirk, 1882 | Entire | Not specified | ML: ; BC: ; TL: ; AL: ; AC: ; AL: ; AC: ; ASC: 71; HC: ; HL: ; FL: ; FW: ; EyD: by | NMNZ; holotype of Architeuthis verrilli Kirk, 1882; specimen no longer extant | Kirk (1882:284, pl. 36 fig. 1) | Verrill (1882d:477); Kirk (1888:35); Pfeffer (1912:33); Suter (1913:1052); Dell (1952:98); Dell (1970:27) | Measurements taken by Kirk, except TL by James McColl. Beak and portions of gladius taken by Italian fishermen and not recovered. | |
| 56 | 1880 | Kvænangen fjord, Norway | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 | Entire | - | - | Grieg (1933:19) | Sivertsen (1955:11) | |||
| 57 | 1880 | Tønsvik, Tromsøysundet, Norway | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 | Entire | - | - | Grieg (1933:19) | ||||
| 58 | October 1880 | Kilkee, County Clare, Ireland | Found washed ashore | "octopus"; Architeuthis sp. | O'Brien (1880:585); Ritchie (1918:137) | Rees (1950:40); Collins (1998:489) | Originally cited as an octopus. | |||||
| 59 | first week of November 1881 | on beach, Hennesey's Cove, Long Island, Placentia Bay, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis princeps? | Entire; "much mutilated by crows and other birds" | Not stated | "very large"; BL+HL: | Verrill specimen No. 28 | Verrill (1882c:221) | M. Harvey letter 19 December 1881 to Verrill | Found by Albert Butcher and George Wareham, "who cut a portion from the head", at uninhabited locality; Verrill considered their estimate of the specimen's length "probably too large". Moses Harvey learned of the specimen from C. D. Chambers, magistrate of Harbour Buffet, Placentia Bay. Only mentioned in Verrill (1882c:221); overlooked by Ellis (1994a:379–384), Ellis (1998a:257–265), and Sweeney & Roper (2001). | |
| 60 | 10 November 1881 | Portugal Cove, near St. John's, Newfoundland | Found floating dead near shore | Architeuthis harveyi | Entire | Entire BL: ; HL: ; EL: ; BC: b) ML: ; BC: ; FL: ; FW: ; TL: ; CL: ; AL: ; TC: ; additional measurements | E.M. Worth Museum. Verrill specimen No. 27 | #Anon1881| ; Verrill (1881b:422); Verrill (1882a:71); Verrill (1882c:201, 219) | Morris article in 25 November 1881 New York Herald; Hatton & Harvey (1883:242); Pfeffer (1912:19); Ellis (1997a:34) | Obtained by Mr. Morris, photographed by E. Lyons Inspector Murphy Verrill of fixed specimen. An 1881 specimen from Portugal Cove with a "body" reportedly long, mentioned in The Evening Telegram of St. John's and cited by Frost (1934:103), presumably refers to the same animal. May have served as a reference for Verrill and J. H. Emerton's original three "life-sized" giant squid models, as Verrill saw the specimen shortly before he began modelling. | ||
| 61 | 30 June 1886 | Cape Campbell, New Zealand | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis kirkii Robson, 1887 | Entire | Beak and club | ML: ; HL: ; AL: ; TL: ; EL: ; BC: ≈ | NMNZ catalog nos. M.125404 & ?M.125406; holotype of Architeuthis kirkii Robson, 1887. Kirk specimen No. 2 | Kirk (1879:310); Verrill (1881b:398); Robson (1887:156) | C.H. Robson letter 19 June 1879 to T.W. Kirk; Pfeffer (1912:35); Suter (1913:1048); Dell (1952:98); Dell (1970:27) | Found by Mr. C.H. Robson; beak given to Mr. A. Hamilton. | |
| 1886 | Cupids and Hearts Content, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | "giant squid" | Two specimens; entire? | None?; cut up for bait | None given | Earle (1977:53) | Moses Harvey only learned of specimens after their destruction. Information sourced from clippings found in one of Harvey's scrapbooks preserved at Newfoundland Public Archives. | ||||
| 62 | "early" October 1887 | Lyall Bay, New Zealand | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis longimanus Kirk, 1888 | Entire | Beak and buccal-mass | Female | EL: ; ML: ; BC: ; extensive additional measurements and description | Dominion Museum building|Dominion Museum] ; holotype of Architeuthis longimanus Kirk, 1888. Specimen not found | Kirk (1888:35, pls. 7–9); Pfeffer (1912:36) | Suter (1913:1049); Dell (1952:98); Dell (1970:27); Wood (1982:191); Ellis (1998a:7, 92); O'Shea & Bolstad (2008); Dery (2013); Paxton (2016a:83) | Strangely proportioned animal that has been much commented on; sometimes cited as the longest giant squid specimen ever recorded. Considered by Paxton (2016a:83) as candidate for "longest measured" total length of any giant squid specimen. Found by Mr. Smith, local fisherman. Measurements taken by T.W. Kirk. Date found listed incorrectly in Dell (1952:98). |
| 63 | 27 August 1888 | between Pico and St. George, Azores Islands at 1266 m depth | By benthic trawl | Architeuthis? sp.? | Large beak | Undetermined | - | Joubin (1895:34) | ||||
| 64 | September 1889 | Løkberg farm, Mo i Rana, Norway | Found washed ashore | Entire | - | BL: ≈5 ells ; TL: 10–12 ells | #Anon1890| | Sivertsen (1955:11, fig. 4) | Bergen Museum notified of find by Lorentz Pettersen of Sjona, Helgeland. Failure to secure remains prompted museum to issue notice in June 1890 issue of Naturen seeking specimens in future and offering to cover all associated transportation and packing costs in addition to regular compensation. | |||
| 1890 | Island Cove, Newfoundland | Found washed ashore | "giant squid" | Entire? | None?; cut up for bait? | None given | Earle (1977:53) | Moses Harvey only learned of specimen after its destruction. Information sourced from clippings found in one of Harvey's scrapbooks preserved at Newfoundland Public Archives. | ||||
| 65 | Unknown | Sao Miguel Island, Azores Islands | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis princeps | Entire? | Jaws and tentacle club | Beak measurements | Museum in Lisbon | Girard (1892:214, pls. 1–2) | Pfeffer (1912:27); Robson (1933:692) | ||
| 66 | 1892 | Greenland | Not stated | Architeuthis monachus | Posselt (1898:279) | |||||||
| Unknown | Talcahuano, Chile | Unknown; collected and donated to ZMB by Ludwig Plate | Ommastrephes gigas; Architeuthis; Dosidicus gigas | Entire | Entire, internal parts missing, preserved in alcohol; "exceptionally good condition" | Female | ML: 865 mm; MW: 230 mm; EL: 1740 mm; HL: 160 mm; HW: 190 mm; FL: 440 mm; FW: 600 mm; TL: 720 mm; CL: 225 mm; AL: 460 mm; AL: 450 mm; AL: 500 mm; AL: 440 mm; LSD: 20 mm ; LSD: 15 mm ; LSD: 14 mm ; EyD: 80 mm; Lens: 35 mm | ZMB Moll. 49.804 | Martens (1894); Glaubrecht & Salcedo-Vargas (2004:53, figs. 1a–f, 2a–g) | Möbius (1898a:373); Möbius (1898b:135); #Anon1899| ; #Anon1902a| ; Kilias (1967:491, fig.); Wechsler (1999) | Non-architeuthid. 'On public display. First noted by Carl Eduard von Martens in November 1894. Exhibited at Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin from 1897 to World War II, and again from 1945–50, when it was housed in main entrance hall in large glass cylinder on marble pedestal. From December 1975, displayed as part of "Meeresungeheuer" exhibit at German Maritime Museum in Stralsund, on loan from ZMB. Return to museum noted in February 1992, when it was placed in new purpose-built container and displayed in Malacological Collection. Incorrectly identified by Kilias (1967:491) as Architeuthis in figure legend, with total length given as ≈2 m. Specimen cast in 1997–98 for creation of 8.5-m-long plastic "giant squid" model, exhibited since 1998 at Übersee-Museum Bremen with sperm whale skull. Re-identified as Dosidicus gigas in June 1998 by Mario Alejandro Salcedo-Vargas. Internal parts apparently removed when specimen originally dissected by Martens or prepared for exhibition. | |
| 67 | 4 February 1895 | Bay of Tateyama [Tokyo Bay], Province of Awa, Japan | In net | Architeuthis japonica Pfeffer, 1912 | Entire | Undetermined | Female | ML: 720 mm; MW: 235 mm; GL: 640 mm; FL: 280 mm; FW: 200 mm; TL: 2910 mm; extensive additional measurements and description | Undetermined; ?Zoological Institute, Science College, Tokyo; holotype of Architeuthis japonica Pfeffer, 1912 | Mitsukuri & Ikeda (1895:39, pl. 10); Pfeffer (1912:27) | Sasaki (1916:89) | Caught in net after 2–3-day storm. |
| 68 | 18 July 1895 | near Angra, Azores Islands | Caught at surface using shrimp net | Dubioteuthis physeteris Joubin, 1900 | Mantle only | Mantle | Male | ML: 460 mm; BD: 115 mm; FL: 220 mm; FW: 110 mm; GL: 390 mm | MOM ; holotype of Dubioteuthis physeteris Joubin, 1900 | Joubin (1900:102, pl. 15 figs. 8–10); Pfeffer (1912:24) | Hardy (1956:288); Roper & Young (1972:220); Toll & Hess (1981:753) | |
| 18 July 1895 | near Angra, Azores Islands | Caught at surface with shrimp net | Architeuthis sp.?; non-architeuthid | Several jaws | Undetermined | - | Joubin (1900:46, pl. 14 figs. 1–2) | Pfeffer (1912:27); Clarke (1956:257) | Non-architeuthid.' | |||
| 69 | 10 April 1896 | Kirkseteroren, Hevnefjorden, Norway | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 | Entire | Entire | Female | BL: 2.5 m; AL: 2.5 m; TL: 7.25 m | VSM | Storm (1897:99); Grieg (1933:19) | Brinkmann (1916:178); Nordgård (1923:11); Nordgård (1928:71); Sivertsen (1955:11) | Model completed in 1954 based on this specimen and #70; restored in 2010. |
| 70 | 27 September 1896 | Kirkseteroren, Hevnefjorden, Norway | Found washed ashore | Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 | Entire | Entire, posterior part missing | Male | TL: 1030+ mm; CL: 900 mm; CSC: 294; TSC: >298; LRL: 17.9 mm; URL: 16.2 mm; additional beak measurements, indices, and counts | VSM; VSM 110a | Storm (1897:99, fig. 20); Grieg (1933:19); Roeleveld (2000:185); Roeleveld (2002:727) | Brinkmann (1916:178, fig. 2); Nordgård (1923:11); Nordgård (1928:71); Sivertsen (1955:11); Toll & Hess (1981:753) | Beak morphometrics studied by Roeleveld (2000). Tentacle morphology examined by Roeleveld (2002). Model completed in 1954 based on this specimen and #69; restored in 2010. |
| 71 | Unknown | Iceland | Not stated | Architeuthis monachus'' | Not specified | Undetermined | - | Posselt (1898:279) | Bardarson (1920:134) |
Type specimens
The following table lists the nominal species-level taxa associated with the genus Architeuthis, together with their corresponding type specimens, type localities, and type repositories. Binomial names are listed alphabetically by specific epithet and presented in their original combinations.| Binomial name and author citation | Systematic status | Type locality | Type specimen and type repository | |
| Loligo bouyeri Crosse & Fischer, 1862:138 | Architeuthid? | Canary Islands? | Unresolved | |
| Architeuthis clarkei Robson, 1933:682, text-figs. 1–7, pl. 1 | Undetermined | Scarborough Beach, Yorkshire, England | BMNH Holotype 1933.1.30.5 + 1926.3.31.24 | |
| Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857:183 | Nomen tantum | |||
| Architeuthis dux Steenstrup in Harting, 1860:11, pl. 1 fig. 1A | Valid species | ZMUC Holotype | ||
| Plectoteuthis grandis Owen, 1881:156, pls. 34–35 | Architeuthis sp. | Not indicated | BMNH Holotype | |
| Architeuthis halpertius Aldrich, 1980:59 | Nomen nudum | |||
| Loligo hartingii Verrill, 1875b:86, fig. 28 | Valid species; Architeuthis hartingii | Not indicated | University of Utrecht as Architeuthis dux, identification by Harting | |
| Megaloteuthis harveyi Kent, 1874a:181 | Architeuthis sp. | Conception Bay, Newfoundland | YPM Type 12600y | |
| Architeuthis japonica Pfeffer, 1912:27 | Undetermined | Tokyo Bay, Japan | Undetermined; Holotype | |
| Architeuthis kirkii Robson, 1887:155 | Architeuthis stockii | Cape Campbell, New Zealand | NMNZ Holotype M.125404 + ?M.125406 | |
| Architeuthis longimanus Kirk, 1888:34, pls. 7–9 | Architeuthis stockii | Lyall Bay, New Zealand | NMNZ Holotype; specimen not located | |
| Megateuthis martensii Hilgendorf, 1880:67 | Valid species; Architeuthis martensii | Yedo Japan fish market, Japan | ZMB Moll. 34716 + 38980 | |
| Architeuthis megaptera Verrill, 1878:207 | Non-architeuthid; Sthenoteuthis pteropus | Nova Scotia, Canada | NSMC 1870–Z-2 | |
| Architeuthis? monachus Steenstrup, 1857:184 | Nomen tantum | |||
| Architeuthis monachus Steenstrup in Harting, 1860:11 | Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 | Raabjerg Strand; Northwest coast of Jutland, Denmark | ZMUC Holotype | |
| Architeuthis mouchezi Vélain, 1875:1002 | Nomen nudum; see Mouchezis sancti-pauli | |||
| Architeuthis nawaji Cadenat, 1935:513 | Undetermined | Île d'Yeu, Bay of Biscay, France | Unresolved | |
| Dubioteuthis physeteris Joubin, 1900:102, pl. 15 | Valid species; Architeuthis physeteris | Azores ; from sperm whale stomach | Grand Banks, Newfoundland; b) North Atlantic | NMNH? ; Syntypes Verrill specimen No. 10, upper and lower beak) |
| Dinoteuthis proboscideus More, 1875a:4527 | Architeuthis sp. | Dingle, County Kerry, Ireland | Unresolved | |
| Mouchezis sancti-pauli Vélain, 1877:81, text-fig. 8 | Valid species; Architeuthis sanctipauli | on beach, St. Paul Island, South Indian Ocean | MNHN Holotype 3-2-658 and 3-2-659 | |
| Steenstrupia stockii Kirk, 1882:286, pl. 36 figs. 2–4 | Valid species; Architeuthis stockii | Cook Strait, New Zealand | NMNZ Holotype M.125405 + M.125403 | |
| Architeuthis titan Steenstrup in Verrill, 1875b:84 | Nomen nudum | |||
| Architeuthis verrilli Kirk, 1882:284, pl. 36 fig. 1 | Species dubium | Island Bay, Cook Strait, New Zealand | NMNZ Holotype; |
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in the List of giant squid table.[|Oceanic sectors]
Oceanic sectors used in the main table follow Sweeney & Roper (2001): the Atlantic Ocean is divided into sectors at the equator and 30°W, the Pacific Ocean is divided at the equator and 180°, and the Indian Ocean is defined as the range 20°E to 115°E. An additional category has been created to accommodate the handful of specimens recorded from the Mediterranean Sea.- NEA, Northeast Atlantic Ocean
- NWA, Northwest Atlantic Ocean
- SEA, Southeast Atlantic Ocean
- SWA, Southwest Atlantic Ocean
- NEP, Northeast Pacific Ocean
- NWP, Northwest Pacific Ocean
- SEP, Southeast Pacific Ocean
- SWP, Southwest Pacific Ocean
- NIO, Northern Indian Ocean
- SIO, Southern Indian Ocean
- MED, Mediterranean Sea
Measurements
Abbreviations used for measurements and counts follow Sweeney & Roper (2001) and are based on standardised acronyms in teuthology, primarily those defined by Roper & Voss (1983), with the exception of several found in older references. Following Sweeney & Roper (2001), the somewhat non-standard EL and WL are used in place of the more common TL and SL, respectively.- AC, arm circumference, AC, AC and AC
- AD, arm diameter, AD, AD and AD
- AF, arm formula
- AL, arm length, AL, AL and AL
- ASC, arm sucker count
- ASD, arm sucker diameter
- BAC, buccal apparatus circumference
- BAL, buccal apparatus length
- BC, body circumference
- BD, body diameter
- BL, body length
- CaL, carpus length
- CL, club length
- CSC, club sucker count
- CSD, club sucker diameter
- CW, club width
- DC, dactylus club length
- EC, egg count
- ED, egg diameter
- EL, "entire" length
- EyD, eye diameter
- EyOD, eye orbit diameter
- FL, fin length
- FuCL, funnel cartilage length
- FuCW, funnel cartilage width
- FuD, funnel opening diameter
- FuL, funnel length
- FW, fin width
- GiL, gill length
- GL, gladius length
- GW, gladius width
- G, daily growth rate
- HC, head circumference
- HeL, hectocotylus length
- HL, head length
- HW, head width
- LAL, longest arm length
- LRL, lower rostral length of beak
- LSD, largest sucker diameter
- MaL, manus length
- ML, dorsal mantle length
- MT, mantle thickness
- MW, maximum mantle width
- NGL, nidamental gland length
- PL, penis length
- RaL, radula length
- RaW, radula width
- RL, rachis length
- RW, rachis width
- SInc, number of statolith increments
- SL, spermatophore length
- SoA, spermatophores on arms
- SSD, stalk sucker diameter
- SSL, spermatophore sac length
- TaL, tail length
- TC, tentacle circumference
- TCL, tentacle club length
- TD, tentacle diameter
- TL, tentacle length
- TSC, tentacle sucker count
- TSD, tentacle sucker diameter
- URL, upper rostral length of beak
- VML, ventral mantle length
- WL, "whole" length
- WT, weight
Repositories
Institutional acronyms follow Sweeney & Roper (2001) and are primarily those defined by Leviton et al. (1985), Leviton & Gibbs (1988), and Sabaj (2016). Where the acronym is unknown, the full repository name is listed.- AMNH, American Museum of Natural History, New York City, New York, United States
- AMS, Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- BAMZ, Bermuda Aquarium, Museum and Zoo, Flatts Village, Bermuda
- BMNH, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, England
- CEPESMA, Museo-Aula del Mar, Coordinadora para el Estudio y la Protección de las Especies Marinas, Luarca, Spain
- EI, Essex Institute, Salem, Massachusetts, United States
- FOSJ, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
- ICM, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- MCNOPM, Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Puerto Madryn, Puerto Madryn, Argentina
- MHNLR, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, La Rochelle, France
- MHNN, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Nice, France
- MMF, Museu Municipal do Funchal, Funchal, Madeira
- MNHN, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, France
- MOM, Musée Océanographique, Monaco
- MUDB, Department of Biology, Memorial University, Newfoundland, Canada
- NIWA, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
- NMI, National Museum of [Ireland – Natural History], Dublin, Ireland
- NMML, National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
- NMNH, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
- NMNZ, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, New Zealand
- NMSJ, Newfoundland Museum, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
- NMSZ, National Museum of Scotland, Zoology Department, Edinburgh, Scotland
- NMV, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- NSMC, Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax, Canada
- PASS, Peabody Academy of Science, Salem, Massachusetts, United States
- RMNH, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- RSMAS, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, Miami, Florida, United States
- SAM, Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa
- SAMA, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia
- SBMNH, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, United States
- SMNH, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
- TMAG, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- VSM, NTNU [Museum of Natural History and Archaeology], Trondheim, Norway
- YPM, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- ZMB, Zoologisches Museum, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- ZMMGU, Zoological Museum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
- ZMUB, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- ZMUC, Kobenhavns Universitet, Zoologisk Museum, Copenhagen, Denmark
Specimen images
The following images relate to pre–20th century giant squid specimens and sightings. The number below each image corresponds to that given in the List of giant squid table and is linked to the relevant record therein. The date on which the specimen was first documented is also given.Full citations
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
*J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
*R
S
T
U
V
W
Y
Z
*Author unknown
Category:Lists of animal specimens