Civil union
A civil union is a legally recognized arrangement similar to marriage, primarily intended to provide legal recognition for same-sex couples. Civil unions grant some or all of the rights of marriage, with child adoption being a common exception.
Civil unions have been established by law in several mostly developed countries in order to provide legal recognition of relationships formed by same-sex couples and to afford them rights, benefits, tax breaks, and responsibilities. In 1989, Denmark was the first country to legalise civil unions; however, most other developed democracies did not begin establishing them until the 1990s and early 2000s. In Brazil, civil unions were first created for opposite-sex couples in 2002, and then expanded to include same-sex couples in 2011. In the majority of countries that established same-sex civil unions, they have since been either supplemented or replaced by same-sex marriage. Civil unions are viewed by LGBT rights campaigners as a "first step" towards establishing same-sex marriage, as civil unions are viewed by supporters of LGBT rights as a "separate but equal" status.
Many jurisdictions with civil unions recognize foreign unions if those are essentially equivalent to their own; for example, the United Kingdom lists equivalent unions in the Civil Partnership Act 2004 Schedule 20. The marriages of same-sex couples performed abroad may be recognized as civil unions in jurisdictions that only have the latter.
Overview and terminology
The terms used to designate civil unions are not standardised and vary widely from country to country. Government-sanctioned relationships that may be similar or equivalent to civil unions include civil partnerships, registered partnerships, domestic partnerships, significant relationships, reciprocal beneficiary relationships, common-law marriage, adult interdependent relationships, life partnerships, stable unions, civil solidarity pacts, and so on. The exact level of rights, benefits, obligations, and responsibilities also varies, depending on the laws of a particular country. Some jurisdictions allow same-sex couples to adopt, while others forbid them to do so, or allow adoption only in specified circumstances.In the United States, the term civil union was introduced in the state of Vermont in 2000 to connote a status equivalent to marriage for same-sex couples; it was chosen by the state's legislators in preference to phrases such as "domestic partner relationship" or "civil accord".
Domestic partnership, offered by some states, counties, cities, and employers since as early as 1985, has generally connoted a lesser status with fewer benefits. However, the legislatures of the West Coast states of California, Oregon and Washington have preferred the term domestic partnership for enactments similar or equivalent to civil union laws in East Coast states.
Civil unions are not seen as a replacement for marriage by many in the LGBT community. "Marriage in the United States is a civil union; a civil union, as it has come to be called, is not marriage", said Evan Wolfson of Freedom to Marry. "It is a proposed hypothetical legal mechanism, since it doesn't exist in most places, to give some of the protections but also withhold something precious from gay people. There's no good reason to do that." However, some opponents of same-sex marriage claim that civil unions rob marriage of its unique status; Randy Thomasson, executive director of the Campaign for California Families, calls civil unions "homosexual marriage by another name" and contends that civil unions provide same-sex couples "all the rights of marriage available under state law". The California Supreme Court, in the In Re Marriage Cases decision, noted nine differences in state law.
Civil unions are commonly criticised as being 'separate but equal'; critics such as former New Zealand MP and feminist Marilyn Waring note that same-sex couples remain excluded from the right to marry and are forced to use a separate institution. Supporters of same-sex marriage contend that treating same-sex couples differently from other couples under the law allows for inferior treatment and that if civil unions were the same as marriage there would be no reason for two separate laws. A New Jersey commission which reviewed the state's civil union law reported that the law "invites and encourages unequal treatment of same-sex couples and their children". Some have suggested that creating civil unions which are open to opposite-sex couples would avoid the accusations of apartheid.
Proponents of civil unions say that they provide practical equality for same-sex couples and solve the problems over areas such as hospital visitation rights and transfer of property caused by lack of legal recognition. Proponents also say that creating civil unions is a more pragmatic way to ensure that same-sex couples have legal rights as it avoids the more controversial issues surrounding marriage and the claim that the term has a religious source.
Many supporters of same-sex marriage state that the word 'marriage' matters and that the term 'civil union' do not convey the emotional meaning or bring the respect that comes with marriage. Former US Solicitor General and attorney in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger case Theodore Olsen said that recognizing same-sex couples under the term 'domestic partnership' stigmatizes gay people's relationships, treating them as if they were "something akin to a commercial venture, not a loving union". Many also contend that the fact that civil unions are often not understood can cause difficulty for same-sex couples in emergency situations.
List of jurisdictions recognizing same-sex unions but not same-sex marriage
As of June 12, 2025, the states that provide civil unions but not marriage for same-sex couples are:- Bolivia
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Hungary
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Monaco
- Montenegro
- San Marino
- the British territories of Bermuda and Cayman Islands
List of jurisdictions recognizing same-sex unions
The following is a list of countries and other jurisdictions which have established civil unions for same-sex couples or opposite-sex couples, categorized by continent, with the year in which the law establishing civil unions in the listed country or other jurisdiction came into effect in brackets:Africa
Americas
- :
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- :
- *
- *
- *
- *
- :
- *
- * Mexico City
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- Netherlands:
- *
- *
- :
- *
- * Río Negro
- * City of Villa Carlos Paz
- * City of Río Cuarto
- United Kingdom:
- *
- *
- *
Asia
- * Ibaraki
- * Osaka
- * Gunma
- * Saga
- * Mie
- * Aomori
- * Akita
- * Fukuoka
- * Tochigi
- * Tokyo
- * Shizuoka
- * Toyama
- * Nagano
- * Gifu
- * Kagawa
- * Shimane
- * Tottori
- * Fukui
- * Yamanashi
- * Yamagata
- * Wakayama
- * Aichi
- * Hyōgo
- * Nara
- * Ōita
- * Tokushima
- * Yamaguchi
- * Fukushima
- * Niigata
- * Shiga
- * Okinawa
- * 423 municipalities
Europe
- :
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- * La Rioja
- *
- opposite-sex since 1999.
- *
- *
- *
- opposite-sex since 2008.
Oceania
- :
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
Countries with former civil unions
Europe
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
Americas
- :
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- *
- :
- *
- *
Asia
- * Special municipalities
- ** Kaohsiung
- ** Taipei
- ** Taichung
- ** Tainan
- ** New Taipei
- ** Taoyuan
- * Provincial cities
- ** Chiayi
- ** Hsinchu
- ** Keelung
- * Counties
- ** Changhua County
- ** Hsinchu County
- ** Yilan County
- ** Chiayi County
- ** Kinmen County
- ** Lienchiang County
- ** Miaoli County
- ** Nantou County
- ** Pingtung County
Oceania
- :
- *
Case studies
Argentina
Since 2003, the Argentine province of Río Negro and the city of Buenos Aires allow domestic partnerships. The City of Villa Carlos Paz allowed it from 2007. Since 2009, the city of Río Cuarto allows Civil Unions.Australia
All levels of Australian Governments under nearly all Australian statutes do recognise same-sex couples as de facto couples as unregistered co-habitation or de facto status since 2009. From 1 July 2009 Centrelink recognised same-sex couples equally regarding social security – under the common-law marriage, de facto status or unregistered cohabitation.Registered relationship recognition in state Governments:
| State or territory | Official relationship status | Year of enactment |
| Australian Capital Territory | Civil partnership | 2008 |
| New South Wales | Registered relationship | 2010 |
| Queensland | Civil partnership | 2012 |
| Tasmania | Significant relationship | 2004 |
| Victoria | Registered domestic relationship | 2008 |
| South Australia | Registered relationship | 2017 |
Registered relationship recognition in 5 local government areas within Australia:
- City of Sydney, New South WalesRegistered relationships since 2004
- Municipality of Woollahra, New South WalesRegistered relationships since 2008
- City of the Blue Mountains, New South WalesRegistered relationships since 2010
- City of Vincent, Western AustraliaRegistered relationships since 2012
- Town of Port Hedland, Western AustraliaRegistered relationships since 2015.