Unfair election
An unfair election identifies when an election is not free and fair. Unfair elections violate one or more of the characteristics of free and fair elections. A free and fair election has the following characteristics:
- Equal voting rights, without unreasonable restrictions
- Freedom of association for political groups and right to be a candidate
- Parity of resources among political groups to persuade
- An informed debate, with equal opportunity to express a view
- The government's power is not unduly curtailed by the constitution or international agreements
- The elected government can take legislative action to enact its promises
- Electoral Commission that ensures a free and fair election
- Voting system that comes close to ensuring all votes count equally
Unfair practices
Electoral fraud
Intimidation and suppression
Limited ballot access
- Unreasonably difficult nomination rules, where it is seen as too difficult for some parties to get on the ballot, such as political censorship
- Undemocratic banning of political parties
Issues with One Person One Vote
- When all votes don't count equally, such as gerrymandering in first-past-the-post voting, wasted votes or vote splitting
Limited media access
- Campaign finance rules that give one group significantly more speech than others
- Significant media bias and a high concentration of media ownership
- State media that has been captured by a group
History
In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights exhorted that "everyone has the right to take part in the government", that "the will of the people is the basis of the authority of government" and that "this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections." In the post war process of decolonialisation, more and more countries became independent from the crumbling European Empires, and many introduced elections of some form, though many countries' transition slid abruptly back into authoritarian regimes. The Soviet Union and countries behind the Iron Curtain had no free elections, until the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. After that a majority of countries around the world have moved toward democratic electoral systems, at least on paper.
Aside from simply denying the vote by outright discrimination, or by curtailing the power of the democratically elected body, interest groups or governments seeking to usurp or hold onto power employed a variety of methods. An early case of electoral fraud was in an election to the county of Northamptonshire in England in 1768, when three earls spent more than £100,000 each to buy votes from voters to win their seats. Voter intimidation was widespread in the March 1933 German federal election, immediately before the Nazi party abolished Parliament's powers. Hitler had become Chancellor at the start of 1933 in a coalition agreement, and with control over the police, opposition party members and campaigners were beaten up and imprisoned throughout the voting process. As electoral systems became more mature, the focus of unfairness turned toward campaign finance and media bias. Almost every country in the developed world introduced limits on the amount that could be spent by any particular candidate in an election. The large exception was the United States, because a majority of judges on the US Supreme Court who were appointed by the Republican Party continued to strike down campaign finance limits as unconstitutional from 1976. A majority of countries also have some form of media regulation, so that news coverage has to be impartial and accurate in its treatment of political issues. Regulation may also extend to who owns news and television organisations, so that the power to grant access information channels is not unduly limited.
Select examples
Below is a small fraction of the examples widely considered by observers to be unfair.Afghanistan
- 2009: Hamid Karzai was the most popular candidate, despite winning just under half of the vote. However, there were widespread claims of electoral fraud.
Azerbaijan
- 2018: Aliyev won over 86% of the vote undemocratically.
Belarus
- 2001: Lukashenko won over 75% of the vote undemocratically.
- 2006: Lukashenko won over 80% of the vote undemocratically.
- 2010: Lukashenko won over 80% of the vote undemocratically. He was congratulated for his re-election by China, Russia, Syria and Vietnam. The European Union and the United States issued a travel ban for Lukashenko.
- 2015: Lukashenko won over 80% of the vote undemocratically.
- 2020: Lukashenko won over 80% of the vote. This election was considered unfair by most international observers. Lukashenko received congratulations from the following countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Burundi, China, Cuba, Eritrea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Myanmar, Nicaragua, North Korea, Oman, Russia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkey, Uzbekistan, Venezuela and Vietnam, as well as the partially-recognised states of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The election result was not accepted by the following countries: Albania, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Iceland, Japan, Norway and Ukraine questioned the legitimacy of the elections, while Afghanistan, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Fiji, Ghana, Israel, the Marshall Islands, Mexico, Micronesia, Monaco, New Zealand, Peru, San Marino, South Korea, Switzerland and Uruguay criticised the government's response to the election.
China
- 1923: The Zhili clique, led by Cao Kun, won over 80% of the vote undemocratically.
Equatorial Guinea
- 2022: The Democratic Party of Equatorial Guinea, led by Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, won over 95% of the vote undemocratically.
Georgia
- 2024: The Georgian Dream, led by Irakli Kobakhidze, won over 53% of the vote undemocratically. President Salome Zourabichvili refused to recognize the official results, describing them "illegitimate".
Hungary
- 1947: The Hungarian Communist Party, led by Mátyás Rákosi, won over 20% of the vote undemocratically.
- 2010-present: Orban's government, for example, used a voter suppression tactic for those living outside of the country by making citizens living in countries where he had less support travel many miles and wait in long lines to cast a ballot. The Government also uses state resources, including state media, to campaign year-round, while opposition parties are heavily limited in their campaigning.
India
Regional elections
- 1987 : The Jammu & Kashmir National Conference, led by Farooq Abdullah, won the election, however there were widespread claims of electoral fraud.
Iran
- 2009: The Alliance of Builders of Islamic Iran, led by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, won over 60% of the vote undemocratically, resulting in global condemnation and protests.
Kazakhstan
- 1991: Nursultan Nazarbayev won over 98% of the vote undemocratically.
- 2019: Kassym-Jomart Tokayev won over 70% of the vote undemocratically.