Argentina
Official census data in graphic form
According to LizcanoThe following table contains information based on a 2014 non-genetic work entitled "Composición Étnica de las Tres Áreas Culturales del Continente Americano al Comienzo del Siglo XXI" by National Autonomous University of Mexico professor Francisco Lizcano Fernández. Lizcano compiled his estimation of groups based on criteria of cultural patterns, not on genotypes nor even phenotype. In these estimations, therefore, "whites" encompasses all those whose practiced culture is predominantly Iberian-derived, while "mestizos" encompasses those whose practiced culture noticeably mixes Iberian and Amerindian cultural traditions, and "Amerindians" only those whose practiced culture is predominantly indigenous. The resulting effect of employing these criteria, therefore, skews the figure of said groups if they had been based on genetic factors, or even based on phenotypic factors. Thus, for instance, the estimate of "whites" given for Chile would include mostly genetic mestizos, while the estimate of "mestizos" in Mexico would include not only a significant proportion of genetic Amerindians, but also many genetic whites, and so on for other countries.
| Country | Population 2014 | Whites | Mestizos | Mulattoes | Amerindians | Blacks | Asians | Creoles & Garifunas | Argentina
According to LatinobarometroThe following table shows how Latin Americans answer the question What race do you consider yourself to belong to? in the Latinobarometro survey.
| Country | Mestizos | Whites | Amerindians | Mulattoes | Blacks | Asians | Other race | Argentina
Genetic studies| Country | European/ Caucasoid
| Indigenous American
| Subsaharan African
| East Asian
| Year | Samples | Notes | | 78.5 | 17.3 | 4.2 | 0 | 2010 | 248 | Nationwide | | 24.6 | 71.1 | 0.7 | 3.6 | 2013 | 720 | Nationwide | | 62 | 17 | 21 | 0 | 2015 | 8 733 | Meta-analysis | | 55.16 | 42.38 | 2.44 | 0 | 2015 | 313 | Nationwide | | 42 | 47 | 11 | 0 | 2010 | 1 737 | Nationwide | | 61 | 30 | 9 | 0 | 2003 | 2 196 | Nationwide | | 71.12 | 6.87 | 20.34 | 1.67 | 2018 | 860 | Nationwide | | 47 | 11 | 42 | 0 | 2016 | - | Estimation | | 33 | 51 | 13 | 0 | 2019 | 240 | Nationwide | | 35 | 62 | 3 | 0 | 2015 | - | Estimation | | 50 | 42 | 8 | 0 | 2016 | - | Estimation | | 50 | 45 | 5 | 0 | 2013 | 934 | Nationwide | | 52.1 | 34.3 | 13.6 | 0 | 2014 | 151 | Nationwide | | 25.4 | 35.87 | 38.72 | 0 | 2002 | 4 202 | Nationwide | | 55.4 | 33.8 | 10.8 | 0 | 2021 | 548 | Eastern region | | 29 | 64 | 7 | 0 | 2014 | 906 | Nationwide | | 63.7 | 15.2 | 21.2 | 0 | 2011 | 642 | Nationwide | | 46.7 | 48.8 | 6.5 | 0 | 2014 | 200 | Nationwide | | 84 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 2013 | - | Nationwide | | 56 | 25 | 19 | 0 | 2016 | - | Estimation |
Skin pigmentationIn Latin America, human skin color and ancestry are often conflated, with lighter skin commonly assumed as indicative of higher levels of European ancestry. A 20th century study on Mexican Americans used skin reflectance data as an estimation of European ancestry. However, genetic evidence published in 2019 has challenged this presumption. A genome-wide association study of 6000 Latin Americans from Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Chile and Peru found that the strongest correlation for light skin color in these populations was actually an amino acid variant of the MFSD12 gene; which is absent in Europeans, but very common in East Asians and Native Americans. The presumption that lighter skin in Latin Americans is an indicator of European ancestry was somewhat unjustified, depending on the gene for light skin.
ArgentinaGenetically, the composition of Argentina is mostly European in ancestry, with Native American and African contributions. According to a 2006 autosomal DNA study the genetic structure of Argentina would be: 78.0% European, 19.4% Amerindian and 2.5% African. Using other methods it was found that it could be: 80.2% European, 18.1% Amerindian and 1.7% African. A 2010 autosomal DNA study found that of the total Argentine population, 78.5% percent of the national genepool was European, 17.3% percent Amerindian, and 4.2% percent African. According to a 2021 investigation, the study of autosomal DIPs show that the genetic contribution is 77.8% European, 17.9% Amerindian and 4.2% African. The X-DIPs matrilineal show 52.9% European, 39.6% Amerindian, and 7.5% African. A 2022 study based on over 2.785 DNA samples revealed a genetic composition of: 85% Caucasian, 13% Amerindian and 1% African. An unweighted autosomal study from 2012 based in 441 DNA samples found the following composition among samples in the Northeast, Salta, Chubut and Buenos Aires: 65% European, 31% Amerindian and 4% African. The study's conclusion was not to achieve a generalized autosomal average of the country, but rather the existence of genetic heterogeneity among differing sample regions.
- Buenos Aires Province: 76% European, 20% Amerindian and 4% African
- South Zone : 54% European, 43% Amerindian and 3% African
- Northeast Zone : 54% European, 41% Amerindian and 5% African
- Northwest Zone : 33% European, 64% Amerindian and 3% African
Other studies indicate that the genetic composition between regions would be:
- Central Zone: 81% European, 15% Amerindian and 4% African
- South Zone: 68% European, 28% Amerindian and 4% African
- Northeast Zone: 79% European, 17% Amerindian and 4% African
- Northwest Zone: 55% European, 35% Amerindian and 10% African
A 2015 genomic study found a mix: 67% European, 28% Amerindian, 4% African and 1.4% Asian.
BrazilGenetic studies have shown the Brazilian population as a whole to have European, African and Native American components. An autosomal study from 2013, with nearly 1300 samples from all of the Brazilian regions, found a predominant degree of European ancestry combined with African and Native American contributions, in varying degrees. 'Following an increasing North to South gradient, European ancestry was the most prevalent in all urban populations. The populations in the North consisted of a significant proportion of Native American ancestry that was about two times higher than the African contribution. Conversely, in the Northeast, Center-West and Southeast, African ancestry was the second most prevalent. At an intrapopulation level, all urban populations were highly admixed, and most of the variation in ancestry proportions was observed between individuals within each population rather than among population'.
An autosomal DNA study, with nearly 1000 samples from all over the country, found a major European contribution, followed by a high African contribution and an important Native American component. "In all regions studied, the European ancestry was predominant, with proportions ranging from 60.6% in the Northeast to 77.7% in the South". The 2011 autosomal study samples came from blood donors, and also public health institutions' personnel and health students. The study showed that Brazilians from different regions are more homogenous than previously thought by some based on the census alone. "Brazilian homogeneity is, therefore, a lot greater between Brazilian regions than within Brazilian regions".
According to a DNA study from 2010, "a new portrayal of each ethnicity contribution to the DNA of Brazilians, obtained with samples from the five regions of the country, has indicated that, on average, European ancestors are responsible for nearly 80% of the genetic heritage of the population. The variation between the regions is small, with the possible exception of the South, where the European contribution reaches nearly 90%. The results, published by the scientific magazine American Journal of Human Biology by a team of the Catholic University of Brasília, show that in Brazil, physical indicators such as skin colour, colour of the eyes and colour of the hair have little to do with the genetic ancestry of each person, which has been shown in previous studies. "Ancestry informative SNPs can be useful to estimate individual and population biogeographical ancestry. Brazilian population is characterized by a genetic background of three parental populations with a wide degree and diverse patterns of admixture. In this work we analyzed the information content of 28 ancestry-informative SNPs into multiplexed panels using three parental population sources to infer the genetic admixture in an urban sample of the five Brazilian geopolitical regions. The SNPs assigned apart the parental populations from each other and thus can be applied for ancestry estimation in a three hybrid admixed population. Data was used to infer genetic ancestry in Brazilians with an admixture model. Pairwise estimates of F among the five Brazilian geopolitical regions suggested little genetic differentiation only between the South and the remaining regions. Estimates of ancestry results are consistent with the heterogeneous genetic profile of Brazilian population, with a major contribution of European ancestry followed by African and Amerindian contributions. The described multiplexed SNP panels can be useful tool for bioanthropological studies but it can be mainly valuable to control for spurious results in genetic association studies in admixed populations". It is important to note that "the samples came from free of charge paternity test takers, thus as the researchers made it explicit: "the paternity tests were free of charge, the population samples involved people of variable socioeconomic strata, although likely to be leaning slightly towards the pardo group".
An autosomal DNA study from 2009 found a similar profile: "all the Brazilian samples lie more closely to the European group than to the African populations or to the Mestizos from Mexico".
A 2015 autosomal genetic study, which also analysed data of 25 studies of 38 different Brazilian populations concluded that: European ancestry accounts for 62% of the heritage of the population, followed by the African and the Native American. The European contribution is highest in Southern Brazil, the African highest in Northeast Brazil and the Native American is the highest in Northern Brazil.
According to another autosomal DNA study from 2008, by the University of Brasília, European ancestry dominates in the whole of Brazil, accounting for 65.90% of heritage of the population, followed by the African contribution and the Native American. São Paulo state, the most populous state in Brazil, with about 40 million people, showed the following composition, according to an autosomal study from 2006: European genes account for 79% of the heritage of the people of São Paulo, 14% are of African origin, and 7% Native American. A more recent study, from 2013, found the following composition in São Paulo state: 61.9% European, 25.5% African and 11.6% Native American.
ChileAccording to 1994 genetic research based on blood types, by Ricardo Cruz-Coke and Rodrigo Moreno, Chilean genetic admixture consists of 64% European, 35% Amerindian, and 1% African ancestry. The European admixture goes from 81% in East Santiago to 61% in West Santiago. Valparaiso and Concepción have 77% and 75% of European genetic admixture respectively. An autosomal DNA study from 2014 found the Chilean overall national genepool to be 44.34% Native American contribution, 51.85% European contribution, and 3.81% African contribution. The samples came from all the 15 regions of Chile, and they were collected in Arica, as the researchers made it clear: "Beginning 2011, 923 volunteers from all 15 regions of Chile, living temporarily or permanently in Arica, with an average age of 28.05 ± 9.37 and belonging to social classes A and B, CA and CB and D were invited to participate on this study". A 2015 autosomal DNA study found Chile to be 55.16% European, 42.38% Native American and 2.44% African and 43.22% Native American, 54.38% European and 2.40% African. Another 2015 autosomal DNA study carried out in two public hospitals found Chile to be 57.20% European, 38.70% Native American and 2.5% African. A 2020 autosomal DNA arrived at the following conclusion: "The country's average ancestry was 0.53 ± 0.14 European, 0.04 ± 0.04 African, and 0.42 ± 0.14 Amerindian, disaggregated into 0.18 ± 0.15 Aymara and 0.25 ± 0.13 Mapuche. However, Mapuche ancestry was highest in the south and Aymara in the north as expected from the historical location of these ethnic groups". Chilean mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome studies indicate mostly Native American haplogroups on the maternal side and European haplogroups on the paternal side.
Colombiapoints out the following genetic mixture for fourteen Colombian departments:
A 2008 autosomal research from University of Brasília determined that Colombian genetic admixture is 45.9% European, 33.8% Amerindian and 20.3% African. A study from 2023 determined that the average Colombian has a mixture of European 51%, native Amerindian 41%, and African 8%. A study from 2010 involving 15 departments estimates the average Colombian to be 42% European, 47% Amerindian, and 11% African. Some studies with samples collected in Paisa region, a genetically isolated population, found the highest European contribution in Colombia. For example, a 2014 genetic research found admixture to be 60% European, 29% Native and 11% African. An autosomal research from 2016 estimated genetic admixture in natural regions of Colombia. European ancestry was slightly predominant in Andean, Caribbean and Orinoquía regions, with African ancestry being dominant in Pacific region and Native ancestry in Amazon region.
The study also estimated admixture in six sub-regions of Andean Colombia. European admixture was higher in Central-West, followed by Central-East and Northeast sub-regions. Native ancestry was higher in Southwest and African ancestry in West sub-region.
Costa RicaWhile the majority of Costa Ricans identify as of criollo or castizo descent, genetic studies demonstrate considerable pre-Columbian Amerindian and a smaller African ancestry. According to an autosomal study, the genetic makeup of Costa Rica is 61% percent European, 30% percent Amerindian and 9% percent African. Regional variation was observed, with greater European influence in the northern and central regions. Increased Amerindian ancestry was found in the south, and a higher African contribution in coastal regions. The Central Valley—where more than half of Costa Ricans live—has a mestizo population with one of the highest European components in Latin America,comparable with another areas with low pre-Columbian Native ancestry and where the current Native population is sparse. During the Spanish colonization of the Americas, Costa Rica was one of the more isolated regions in the Americas. According to genetic studies, the average Costa Rican from the Central Valley is 67 percent European, 29 percent Native and 4 percent Subsaharan African.
CubaAn autosomal study from 2014 has found the genetic ancestry in Cuba to be 72% European, 20% African and 8% Native American.
Dominican RepublicAccording to a recent autosomal study, the genetic composition of the Dominican Republic was 51.2 percent European, 41.8 percent African and 8 percent Native. According to a 2010 DNA autosomal study, the genetic composition of genepool of Ecuadorians is 53.9% Native American, 38.8% European, and 7.3% African. Another genetic study shows Ecuadorias are 64.6% Native American, 31.0% European, and 4.4% African. According to a 2015 DNA autosomal study, the composition of Ecuador is: 50.1% Native American, 40.8% European, 6.8% African and 2.3% Asian. A large majority of the population is declared mestizos. El Salvador is one of the most homogeneous countries in Latin America. According to a genetic research from 2015, Salvadoran genetic admixture is 48.8% Amerindian, 46.7% European, and 4.5% African. The genetic study "Genetic Components in America's demography" revealed a similar genetic mix and genetic makeup, with 52% European component, 40% Amerindian component, 6% African and 2% Arab. According to an autosomal DNA study from 2008, by the University of Brasília, Salvadoran genetic admixture is 75.2% Amerindian, 15.1% European, and 9.7% African. According to the study Population data for 12 Y-chromosome STR loci in a sample from El Salvador, the study revealed that the population of El Salvador was closer to the European conglomerate than to the group of native and mestizo populations of Central and South America, which can be explained by the differences in the proportion of European contributions versus Amerindian in these population groups. The study "Geographic Patterns of Genome Admixture in Latin American Mestizos" by PLoS Genetics found that the composition of Guatemala were 55% Amerindian, 41% European, and 4% African into Ladinos, for the ethnic Amerindians were 92% Amerindian and 8% European.
MexicoA 2007 autosomal study estimated that the average admixture of Mexicans is approximately 50% European, 45% Amerindian, and 5% African. Higher Amerindian ancestry on the X chromosome was observed, consistent with predominantly European patrilineal and Native American matrilineal ancestry. A 2009 autosomal study found average admixture of Mexican Mestizos from six states to be 55.2% Native, 41.8% European, 1.8% African and 1.2% Asian. Likewise, a 2012 genetic study conducted over samples of six states, found average admixture to be 54.4% Native, 40.2% European and 5.4% African. A study by Mexico's National Institute of Genomic Medicine reported that mestizo Mexicans are on average 58.96% European, 31.05% Amerindian, and 10.03% African. The African contribution ranges from 2.8 percent in Sonora to 11.13 percent in Veracruz. Eighty percent of the population was classified as mestizo. The study was conducted among volunteers from six states and an indigenous group, the Zapotecs. A study in Mexico City found that its mestizo population had the greatest variation in Latin America, with its mestizos being either largely European or Amerindian rather than having a uniform admixture. The study's results are similar to those by INMEGEN in which the European admixture is 56.8 percent, followed by Native American ancestry with 39.8 percent and an African contribution of 3.4 percent. Additional studies suggest a correlation between greater European admixture with a higher socioeconomic status, and greater Amerindian ancestry with a lower socioeconomic status. A study of low-income Mexicans found the mean admixture to be 0.590, 0.348 and 0.062 Amerindian, European and African respectively, while a study of Mexicans with an income higher than the mean found their European admixture to be 82 percent. On average, 68 haplotypes account for 95% of the chromosomes in Mexicans. According to a nationwide study in 2018, the genetic admixture of modern Mexicans averaged 60% Native American, 36% European, and 4% African.
NicaraguaKirkegaard and Fuerst´s study with 688 Nicaraguans from overall country found majority of European genes at 57%, follow by Native American genes at 23% and very close African genes at 20%. A genetic study with 100 Nicaraguan samples from Western and Southern part of the country, found average admixture to be 48,66% European, 36,83% Amerindian and 16,29% African. According to an investigation from 2010, the Nicaraguan average admixture is 69% European, 20% African and 11% Amerindian.
PeruAccording to genetic research in 2020, Peruvian genetic admixture consists of 63,6% Amerindian, 29,3% European, 3,8% African ancestry and 2,9% asian ancestry. According to a 2015 DNA autosomal study, the composition of Peru is: 68.3% Native American, 26.0% European, 3.2% African and 2.5% Asian. A 2009 DNA study in the American Journal of Human Biology showed the genetic contribution to the genepool of Uruguay as a whole is primarily derived from Europe, with Native American ancestry ranging from 1 to 10 percent and African from 7 to 15 percent. A 2014 study, "in agreement with those obtained from a study using nDNA", put the average for the whole country as 6% African and 10% Native American.
|
|
|