Affricate


An affricate is a consonant that begins as a stop and releases as a fricative, generally with the same place of articulation. It is often difficult to decide if a stop and fricative form a single phoneme or a consonant pair. English has two affricate phonemes, and, generally spelled ch and j, respectively.

Examples

The English sounds spelled "ch" and "j", German and Italian z and Italian z are typical affricates, and sounds like these are fairly common in the world's languages, as are other affricates with similar sounds, such as those in Polish and Chinese. However, voiced affricates other than are relatively uncommon. For several places of articulation they are not attested at all.
Much less common are labiodental affricates, such as in German, Kinyarwanda and Izi, or velar affricates, such as in Tswana or in High Alemannic Swiss German dialects. Worldwide, relatively few languages have affricates in these positions even though the corresponding stop consonants, and, are common or virtually universal. Also less common are alveolar affricates where the fricative release is lateral, such as the sound found in Nahuatl and Navajo. Some other Athabaskan languages, such as Dene Suline, have unaspirated, aspirated, and ejective series of affricates whose release may be dental, alveolar, postalveolar, or lateral:,,,,,,,,,,, and.

Notation

Affricates are transcribed in the International Phonetic Alphabet by a combination of two letters, one for the stop element and the other for the fricative element. In order to clarify that these are parts of a single consonant, a tie bar may be used. The tie bar appears most commonly above the two letters, but may be placed under them if it fits better there, or simply because it is more legible. Thus:
or
A less common notation indicates the release of the affricate with a superscript:
This is derived from the IPA convention of indicating other releases with a superscript. However, this convention is more typically used for a fricated release that is too brief to be considered a true affricate.
Though they are no longer standard IPA, ligatures are available in Unicode for the sibilant affricates, which remain in common use:
Approved for Unicode 18 in 2026, per request from the IPA, are the remaining coronal affricates:
Ligatures for the non-coronal affricates have also been used.
Any of these notations can be used to distinguish an affricate from a sequence of plosive plus fricative, which is contrastive in languages such as Polish. However, in languages where there is no such distinction within a syllable, such as English or Turkish, a simple sequence of letters such as is commonly used, with no overt indication that they form an affricate. In such cases the syllable boundary may be written to distinguish the plosive-fricative sequence in petshop from the similar affricate in ketchup.
In other phonetic transcription systems, such as the Americanist system, affricates may be transcribed with single letters. The affricate may be transcribed as or ; as, or ; as or ; as, or ; as ; and as.
Single letters may also be used with phonemic transcription in IPA: and are sometimes transcribed with the symbols for the palatal stops, and, for example in the IPA Handbook.

Affricates vs. stop–fricative sequences

In some languages, affricates contrast phonemically with stop–fricative sequences:
  • Polish affricate in czysta 'clean (f.)' versus stop–fricative in trzysta 'three hundred'; or affricate in dżem 'jam' versus stop–fricative in drzem 'snooze ';
  • Klallam affricate in k'ʷə́nc 'look at me' versus stop–fricative in k'ʷə́nts 'he looks at it'.
The exact phonetic difference varies between languages. In stop–fricative sequences, the stop has a release burst before the fricative starts; but in affricates, the fricative element is the release. Phonologically, stop–fricative sequences may have a syllable boundary between the two segments, but not necessarily.
In English, and are considered phonemically stop–fricative sequences. They often contain a morpheme boundary. The English affricate phonemes and do not contain morpheme boundaries.
The phonemic distinction in English between the affricate and the stop–fricative sequence can be observed by minimal pairs such as the following:worst shinworse chin
The in 'worst shin' can be elided:.
Stop–fricatives can be distinguished acoustically from affricates by the rise time of the frication noise, which is shorter for affricates.

Geminate affricates

When affricates are geminated, it is the duration of the plosive closure that is lengthened, not that of the frication. For example, is pronounced, not *.

List of affricates

In the case of coronals, the symbols are normally used for the stop portion of the affricate regardless of place. For example, is commonly seen for, for and for.
The exemplar languages are ones that have been reported to have these sounds, but in several cases, they may need confirmation.

Sibilant affricates

VoicelessLanguagesVoicedLanguages
Voiceless alveolar affricate
Albanian c
Georgian
German z, tz
Japanese つ/ツ
Kʼicheʼ
Mandarin z
Italian z
Pashto څ
Voiced alveolar affricate
Albanian x
Georgian
Japanese
Italian z
Pashto ځ
Voiceless dental sibilant affricate
Hungarian c
Macedonian ц
Serbo-Croatian c
Polish c
Voiced dental sibilant affricate
Hungarian dz
Macedonian ѕ
Bulgarian дз
Polish dz
Voiceless alveolo-palatal affricate
Japanese ち/チ
Mandarin j
Polish ć, ci
Serbo-Croatian ć
Thai
Vietnamese ch
Voiced alveolo-palatal affricate
Japanese じ/ジ, ぢ/ヂ
Polish , dzi
Serbo-Croatian đ
Korean
Voiceless palato-alveolar affricate
Albanian ç
English ch, tch
Georgian ჩ
German tsch
Hungarian cs
Indonesian c
Italian ci, ce
Latvian č
Lithuanian č
Maltese ċ
Persian چ
Romanian ci, ce
Spanish ch
Turkish ç
Walloon tch
Voiced palato-alveolar affricate
Albanian xh
Arabic ج
English j, g
Georgian ჯ
Hungarian dzs
Indonesian j
Italian gi, ge
Latvian
Lithuanian
Maltese ġ
Romanian gi, ge
Turkish c
Walloon dj
Voiceless retroflex affricate
Mandarin zh
Polish cz
Serbo-Croatian č
Slovak č
Vietnamese tr
Voiced retroflex affricate
Polish
Serbo-Croatian
Slovak

The Northwest Caucasian languages Abkhaz and Ubykh both contrast sibilant affricates at four places of articulation: alveolar, postalveolar, alveolo-palatal and retroflex. They also distinguish voiceless, voiced, and ejective affricates at each of these.
When a language has only one type of affricate, it is usually a sibilant; this is the case in e.g. Arabic, most dialects of Spanish, and Thai.

Non-sibilant affricates

Sound IPALanguagesSound IPALanguages
Voiceless bilabial affricatePresent allophonically in Kaingang and Taos. Not reported as a phoneme in any natural language.Voiced bilabial affricateAllophonic in Banjun and Shipibo
Voiceless bilabial-labiodental affricateGerman, TekeVoiced bilabial-labiodental affricateTeke
Voiceless labiodental affricateXiNkuna TsongaVoiced labiodental affricateXiNkuna Tsonga
Voiceless dental non-sibilant affricateNew York English, Luo, Dene Suline, Cun, some varieties of Venetian and other North Italian dialectsVoiced dental non-sibilant affricateNew York, Dublin, and Maori English, Dene Suline
Voiceless retroflex non-sibilant affricateMapudungun, MalagasyVoiced retroflex non-sibilant affricateMalagasy
Voiceless palatal affricateSkolt Sami, Hungarian, Albanian, allophonically in KaingangVoiced palatal affricateSkolt Sami, Hungarian, Albanian, some Spanish dialects. Not reported to contrast with a voiced palatal plosive
velar affricate">velar consonant">velar affricateTswana, High Alemannic GermanVoiced velar affricateAllophonic in some English English
Voiceless uvular affricateNez Percé, Wolof, Bats, Kabardian, Avar, Tsez. Not reported to contrast with a voiceless uvular plosive in natural languages.Voiced uvular affricateReported from the Raivavae dialect of Austral and Ekagi with a velar lateral allophone before front vowels.
Voiceless pharyngeal affricateHaida. Not reported to contrast with an epiglottal stop Voiced pharyngeal affricateSomali. Pronounced or sometimes with weak epiglottal trilling initially, otherwise realized as
Voiceless glottal affricateAllophonic in Received PronunciationVoiced glottal affricateNot attested in any natural language

Lateral affricates

Sound IPALanguagesSound IPALanguages
lateral affricate">lateral consonant">lateral affricateCherokee, Nahuatl, Navajo, Tswana, etc.Voiced alveolar lateral affricateGwich'in, Sandawe. Not reported to ever contrast with a voiced alveolar lateral fricative.
Voiceless retroflex lateral affricateBhadrawahi, apical post-alveolar. Realization of phonemic in Kamkata-vari and Kamvari.Voiced retroflex lateral affricateBhadrawahi, apical post-alveolar. Realization of phonemic in Kamkata-vari and Kamviri.
Voiceless palatal lateral affricateas ejective in Dahalo; in free variation with in Hadza.Voiced palatal lateral affricateAllophonic in Sandawe.
Voiceless velar lateral affricateas a prevelar in Archi and as an ejective in Zulu, also exist in the Laghuu language.Voiced velar lateral affricateLaghuu.

Trilled affricates

Sound IPALanguagesSound IPALanguages
Voiceless trilled bilabial affricateNot attested in any natural language.Voiced trilled bilabial affricateKele and Avava. Reported only in an allophone of before or .
Voiceless trilled alveolar affricateNgkoth.Voiced trilled alveolar affricateNias. Fijian and Avava also have this sound after .
Voiceless epiglottal affricateHydaburg Haida.Voiced epiglottal affricateHydaburg Haida. Cognate to Southern Haida, Masset Haida.

Itene, Oro Win, Sangtam, and Wari' have a dental stop with bilabial trilled release.

Heterorganic affricates

Although most affricates are homorganic, Navajo and Chiricahua Apache have a heterorganic alveolar-velar affricate. Itene, Oro Win, Sangtam, and Wari' have a voiceless dental bilabially trilled affricate . Blackfoot has and. Other heterorganic affricates are reported for Northern Sotho and other Bantu languages such as Phuthi, which has alveolar–labiodental affricates and, and Sesotho, which has bilabial–palatoalveolar affricates and. Djeoromitxi has and.

Phonation, coarticulation and other variants

The coronal and dorsal places of articulation attested as ejectives as well:. Several Khoisan languages such as Taa are reported to have voiced ejective affricates, but these are actually pre-voiced:. Affricates are also commonly aspirated:, murmured:, and prenasalized: . Labialized, palatalized, velarized, and pharyngealized affricates are also common. Affricates may also have phonemic length, that is, affected by a chroneme, as in Italian and Karelian.

Phonological representation

In phonology, affricates tend to behave similarly to stops, taking part in phonological patterns that fricatives do not. analyzes phonetic affricates as phonological stops. A sibilant or lateral stop can be realized phonetically only as an affricate and so might be analyzed phonemically as a sibilant or lateral stop. In that analysis, affricates other than sibilants and laterals are a phonetic mechanism for distinguishing stops at similar places of articulation. For example, Chipewyan has laminal dental vs. apical alveolar ; other languages may contrast velar with palatal and uvular.
Affricates may also be a strategy to increase the phonetic contrast between aspirated or ejective and tenuis consonants.
According to, no language contrasts a non-sibilant, non-lateral affricate with a stop at the same place of articulation and with the same phonation and airstream mechanism, such as and or and.
In feature-based phonology, affricates are distinguished from stops by the feature .

Affrication

Affrication is a sound change by which a consonant, usually a stop or fricative, changes into an affricate. Examples include:

Pre-affrication

In rare instances, a fricative–stop contour may occur. This is the case in dialects of Scottish Gaelic that have velar frication where other dialects have pre-aspiration. For example, in the Harris dialect there is seachd 'seven' and ochd 'eight'. Richard Wiese argues this is the case for word-initial fricative-plosive sequences in German, and coined the term suffricate for such contours. Awngi has 2 suffricates and according to some analyses.