Flatfish
Flatfish are a group of ray-finned fish belonging to the suborder Pleuronectoidei and historically the order Pleuronectiformes. Their collective common name is due to their habit of lying on one side of their laterally-compressed body upon the seafloor; in this position, both eyes lie on the side of the head facing upwards, while the other side of the head and body lies on the substrate. This loss of symmetry, a unique adaptation in vertebrates, stems from one eye "migrating" towards the other during the juvenile's metamorphosis; due to variation, some species tend to face their left side upward, some their right side, and others face either side upward. Pleuronectidae lie on their left side, with eyes on the right. Paralichthyidae lie on their right side, with eyes on the left. The "primitive" genus Psettodes may develop into "right-facing" or "left-facing" individuals.
They are one of the most speciose groups of demersal fish. Their cryptic coloration and habits, a form of camouflage, conceals them from potential predators.
Common names
There are a multitude of common names for flatfish, as they are a widespread group of fish and important food fish across the world. The following are common flatfish names in English:As these are merely common names, they do not conform with the "natural" relationships that are recovered through scientific studies of morphology or genetics. As examples, the three species consistently called "halibut" are themselves part of the right-eye flounder family, while the spiny turbots are not at all closely related to "true" turbot, but are consistently recovered in a "primitive" or basal position at the base of flatfish phylogenetic trees.
Distribution
Flatfishes are found in oceans worldwide, ranging from the Arctic, through the tropics, to Antarctica. Species diversity is centered in the Indo-West Pacific and declines following both latitudinal and longitudinal gradients away from this centre of diversity. Most species are found in depths between 0 and, but a few have been recorded from depths in excess of. None have been confirmed from the abyssal or hadal zones of the deep sea; a reported observation of a flatfish from the Bathyscaphe Trieste's dive into the Mariana Trench has been questioned by ichthyologists, and recent authorities do not recognize it as valid. Among the deepwater species is Symphurus thermophilus, a tonguefish which congregates around "ponds" of sulphur at hydrothermal vents on the seafloor; no other flatfish is known from hydrothermal vent ecosystems.Conversely, many species will enter brackish or fresh water, and a smaller number of soles and tonguefish are entirely restricted to fresh water.
Description
The most obvious characteristic of the flatfish is their asymmetry, with both eyes lying on the same side of the head in the adult fish. In some families, the eyes are usually on the right side of the body, and in others, they are usually on the left. The primitive spiny turbots include equal numbers of right- and left-sided individuals, and are generally less asymmetrical than the other families. Other distinguishing features of the order are the presence of protrusible eyes, another adaptation to living on the seabed, and the extension of the dorsal fin onto the head.The surface of the fish facing away from the sea floor is pigmented, often serving to camouflage the fish, but at times displaying striking patterns. Some flatfishes are also able to change their pigmentation to match the background using their chromatophores, in a manner similar to some cephalopods. The side of the body without the eyes, facing the seabed, is usually colourless or very pale.
In general, flatfishes rely on their camouflage for avoiding predators, but some have aposematic traits such as conspicuous eyespots and several small tropical species are poisonous. Juveniles of Soleichthys maculosus mimic toxic flatworms of the genus Pseudobiceros in both colours and swimming pattern. Conversely, a few octopus species have been reported to mimic flatfishes in colours, shape and swimming mode.
Flatfishes range in size from the sand flounder Tarphops oligolepis, measuring about in length, and weighing, to the Hippoglossus halibuts, with the Atlantic halibut measuring up to long, and the Pacific halibut weighing up to.
Many species such as flounders and spiny turbots eat smaller fish, and have well-developed teeth. These species sometimes hunt in the midwater, away from the bottom, and show fewer "extreme" adaptations than other families. The soles, by contrast, are almost exclusively bottom-dwellers, and feed on benthic invertebrates. They show a more extreme asymmetry, and may lack teeth on one side of the jaw.
Development
Flatfishes lay eggs that hatch into larvae resembling typical, symmetrical, fish. These are initially elongated, but quickly develop into a more rounded form. The larvae typically have protective spines on the head, over the gills, and in the pelvic and pectoral fins. They also possess a swim bladder, and do not dwell on the bottom, instead dispersing from their hatching grounds as ichthyoplankton. Bilaterally symmetric fish such as goldfish maintain balance using a system within their inner ears which involves the otolith, but larval and metamorphizing flatfish require visible light to properly orient themselves.The length of the planktonic stage varies between different types of flatfishes, but through the influence of thyroid hormones, they eventually begin to metamorphose into the adult form. One of the eyes migrates across the top of the head and onto the other side of the body, leaving the fish blind on one side. The larva also loses its swim bladder and spines, and sinks to the bottom, laying its blind side on the underlying surface.
Hybrids
Hybrids are well known in flatfishes. The Pleuronectidae have the largest number of reported hybrids of marine fishes. Two of the most famous intergeneric hybrids are between the European plaice and European flounder in the Baltic Sea, and between the English sole and starry flounder in Puget Sound. The offspring of the latter species pair is popularly known as the hybrid sole and was initially believed to be a valid species in its own right.Evolution
Flatfishes have been cited as dramatic examples of evolutionary adaptation. In The Blind Watchmaker, Richard Dawkins explains the flatfishes' evolutionary history as such:...bony fish as a rule have a marked tendency to be flattened in a vertical direction.... It was natural, therefore, that when the ancestors of took to the sea bottom, they should have lain on one side.... But this raised the problem that one eye was always looking down into the sand and was effectively useless. In evolution this problem was solved by the lower eye 'moving' round to the upper side.
Scientists have been proposing since the 1910s that flatfishes evolved from more "typical" percoid ancestors. The fossil record indicated that flatfishes might have been present before the Eocene, based on fossil otoliths resembling those of modern pleuronectiforms dating back to the Thanetian and Ypresian stages. Despite this, the origin of the unusual morphology of flatfishes was enigmatic up to the 2000s, with earlier researchers having suggested that it came about as a result of saltation rather than gradual evolution through natural selection, because a partially migrated eye was considered to have been maladaptive.
This started to change in 2008 with a study on the two fossil fish genera; Amphistium and Heteronectes, which dated to about 50 million years ago. These genera retain primitive features not seen in modern types of flatfishes, such as their heads being less asymmetric than modern flatfishes, retaining one eye on each side of their heads, although the eye on one side is closer to the top of the head than on the other. The more recently described fossil genera Quasinectes and Anorevus have been proposed to show similar morphologies and have also been classified as "stem-pleuronectiforms". Such findings lead palaeontologist Matt Friedman to conclude that the evolution of flatfish morphology "happened gradually, in a way consistent with evolution via natural selection—not suddenly as researchers once had little choice but to believe."
To explain the survival advantage of a partially migrated eye, it has been proposed that primitive flatfishes like Amphistium rested with the head propped up above the seafloor, enabling them to use their partially migrated eye to see things closer to the seafloor. While known basal genera like Amphistium and Heteronectes support a gradual acquisition of the flatfish morphology, they were probably not direct ancestors to living pleuronectiforms, as fossil evidence indicate that most flatfish lineages living today were present in the Eocene and contemporaneous with them. It has been suggested that the more primitive forms were eventually outcompeted.
Taxonomy
Due to their highly distinctive morphology, flatfishes were previously treated as belonging to their own order, Pleuronectiformes. However, more recent taxonomic studies have found them to group within a diverse group of nektonic marine fishes known as the Carangiformes, which also includes jacks and billfish. Specifically, flatfish have been recovered to be closely related to various groups, such as the threadfins, archerfish, and beachsalmons. Due to this, they are now treated as a suborder of the Carangiformes, as represented in Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes.Classification
The following classification is based on Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes :- Suborder Pleuronectoidei
- * Family Polynemidae Rafinesque, 1815
- * Family Psettodidae Regan, 1910
- * Family Citharidae de Buen, 1935
- * Family Scophthalmidae Chabanaud, 1933
- * Family Cyclopsettidae Campbell, Chanet, Chen, Lee & Chen, 2019
- *Family Grammatobothidae Tongboonkua, Chanet & Chen, 2025
- * Family Monolenidae Tongboonkua, Chanet & Chen, 2025
- * Family Taeniopsettidae Amaoka, 1969
- * Family Bothidae Smitt, 1892
- * Family Paralichthyidae Regan, 1910
- * Family Pleuronectidae Rafinesque, 1815
- * Family Paralichthodidae Regan, 1920
- * Family Oncopteridae Jordan & Goss, 1889
- * Family Rhombosoleidae Regan, 1910
- * Family Achiropsettidae Heemstra, 1990
- * Family Achiridae Rafinesque, 1815
- * Family Samaridae Jordan & Goss, 1889
- * Family Poecilopsettidae Norman, 1934
- * Family Soleidae Bonaparte, 1833
- * Family Cynoglossidae Jordan, 1888
Fossil taxa
The following basal fossil flatfish from the Paleogene are also known:- Genus ?†Anorevus Bannikov & Zorzin, 2020
- Genus †Eobothus Eastman, 1914
- Genus †Heteronectes Friedman, 2008
- Genus †Imhoffius Chabanaud, 1940
- Genus †Keasichthys Murray & Champagne, 2025
- Genus †Numidiopleura Gaudant & Gaudant, 1969
- Genus ?†Quasinectes Bannikov & Zorzin, 2019
- Family †Amphistiidae Boulenger, 1902
- Family †Joleaudichthyidae Chabanaud, 1937
Phylogeny
There has been some disagreement whether flatfish as a whole are a monophyletic group. Some palaeontologists think that some percomorph groups unrelated to flatfishes were also "experimenting" with head asymmetry during the Eocene, and certain molecular studies conclude that the primitive family of Psettodidae evolved their flat bodies and asymmetrical head independently of other flatfish groups. The following phylogeny is from Lü et al. 2021; a whole-genome analysis using concatenated sequences of coding sequence and 4dTV derived from 1,693 single-copy genes. Notably, Pleuronectiformes is found to be polyphyletic as seen here:However, threadfins aren't universally found to be nested within the group of flatfish, as recovered by a study of ultraconserved elements from the threadfin family in Girard et al. 2022, or as represented in the World Register of Marine Species, where Pleuronectiformes is retained as a name for the flatfish group. Numerous scientists continue to argue for a monophyletic group of all flatfish, though the debate continues.
Over 800 described species are placed into 16 families. When they were treated as an order, the flatfishes are divided into two suborders, Psettodoidei and Pleuronectoidei, with > 99% of the species diversity found within the Pleuronectoidei. The largest families are Soleidae, Bothidae and Cynoglossidae with more than 150 species each. There also exist two monotypic families. Some families are the results of relatively recent splits. For example, the Achiridae were classified as a subfamily of Soleidae in the past, and the Samaridae were considered a subfamily of the Pleuronectidae. The families Paralichthodidae, Poecilopsettidae, and Rhombosoleidae were also traditionally treated as subfamilies of Pleuronectidae, but are now recognised as families in their own right. The Paralichthyidae has long been indicated to be paraphyletic, with the formal description of Cyclopsettidae in 2019 resulting in the split of this family as well. The following is the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree from Campbell et al. 2019, which was obtained by analyzing seven protein-coding genes. This study erected two new families to resolve the previously non-monophyletic status of Paralichthyidae and the Rhombosoleidae:
The taxonomy of some groups is in need of a review. The last monograph covering the entire order was John Roxborough Norman's Monograph of the Flatfishes published in 1934. In particular, Tephrinectes sinensis may represent a family-level lineage and requires further evaluation e.g. New species are described with some regularity and undescribed species likely remain.
Timeline of genera
ImageSize = width:1000 height:auto barincrement:15px
PlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10px
Period = from:-65.5 till:15
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:5 start:-65.5
ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:-65.5
TimeAxis = orientation:hor
AlignBars = justify
Colors =
#legends
id:CAR value:claret
id:ANK value:rgb
id:HER value:teal
id:HAD value:green
id:OMN value:blue
id:white value:black
id:white value:white
id:cenozoic value:rgb
id:paleogene value:rgb
id:paleocene value:rgb
id:eocene value:rgb
id:oligocene value:rgb
id:neogene value:rgb
id:miocene value:rgb
id:pliocene value:rgb
id:quaternary value:rgb
id:pleistocene value:rgb
id:holocene value:rgb
BarData=
bar:eratop
bar:space
bar:periodtop
bar:space
bar:NAM1
bar:NAM2
bar:NAM3
bar:NAM4
bar:NAM5
bar:NAM6
bar:NAM7
bar:NAM8
bar:NAM9
bar:NAM10
bar:NAM11
bar:NAM12
bar:NAM13
bar:NAM14
bar:NAM15
bar:NAM16
bar:NAM17
bar:NAM18
bar:NAM19
bar:NAM20
bar:NAM21
bar:NAM22
bar:NAM23
bar:NAM24
bar:NAM25
bar:NAM26
bar:NAM27
bar:NAM28
bar:NAM29
bar:NAM30
bar:NAM31
bar:NAM32
bar:NAM33
bar:NAM34
bar:NAM35
bar:NAM36
bar:NAM37
bar:NAM38
bar:space
bar:period
bar:space
bar:era
PlotData=
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark: width:25
shift:
bar:periodtop
from: -65.5 till: -55.8 color:paleocene text:Paleocene
from: -55.8 till: -33.9 color:eocene text:Eocene
from: -33.9 till: -23.03 color:oligocene text:Oligocene
from: -23.03 till: -5.332 color:miocene text:Miocene
from: -5.332 till: -2.588 color:pliocene text:Plio.
from: -2.588 till: -0.0117 color:pleistocene text:Pleist.
from: -0.0117 till: 0 color:holocene text:H.
bar:eratop
from: -65.5 till: -23.03 color:paleogene text:Paleogene
from: -23.03 till: -2.588 color:neogene text:Neogene
from: -2.588 till: 0 color:quaternary text:Q.
PlotData=
align:left fontsize:M mark: width:5 anchor:till align:left
color:eocene bar:NAM1 from:-55.8 till:-33.9 text:Amphistium
color:eocene bar:NAM2 from:-55.8 till:-33.9 text:Eobothus
color:eocene bar:NAM3 from:-55.8 till:-33.9 text:Eobuglossus
color:eocene bar:NAM4 from:-55.8 till:-33.9 text:Imhoffius
color:eocene bar:NAM5 from:-55.8 till:-33.9 text:Joleaudichthys
color:eocene bar:NAM6 from:-55.8 till:-33.9 text:Turahbuglossus
color:eocene bar:NAM7 from:-55.8 till:0 text:Scophthalmus
color:eocene bar:NAM8 from:-55.8 till:0 text:Citharus
color:eocene bar:NAM9 from:-55.8 till:0 text:Psettodes
color:eocene bar:NAM10 from:-37.2 till:0 text:Arnoglossus
color:oligocene bar:NAM11 from:-33.9 till:0 text:Bothus
color:oligocene bar:NAM12 from:-33.9 till:0 text:Monolene
color:oligocene bar:NAM13 from:-33.9 till:0 text:Solea
color:oligocene bar:NAM14 from:-28.4 till:0 text:Buglossidium
color:oligocene bar:NAM15 from:-28.4 till:0 text:Hippoglossoides
color:oligocene bar:NAM16 from:-28.4 till:0 text:Lepidorhombus
color:miocene bar:NAM17 from:-23.03 till:0 text:Dicologoglossa
color:miocene bar:NAM18 from:-23.03 till:0 text:Paraplagusia
color:miocene bar:NAM19 from:-23.03 till:0 text:Platichthys
color:miocene bar:NAM20 from:-15.97 till:0 text:Achiurus
color:miocene bar:NAM21 from:-15.97 till:0 text:Microchirus
color:miocene bar:NAM22 from:-15.97 till:0 text:Microstomus
color:miocene bar:NAM23 from:-11.608 till:-5.332 text:Evesthes
color:miocene bar:NAM24 from:-11.608 till:0 text:Citharichthys
color:miocene bar:NAM25 from:-11.608 till:0 text:Monochirus
color:miocene bar:NAM26 from:-11.608 till:0 text:Paralichthys
color:miocene bar:NAM27 from:-11.608 till:0 text:Pleuronichthys
color:pliocene bar:NAM28 from:-5.332 till:0 text:Atheresthes
color:pliocene bar:NAM29 from:-5.332 till:0 text:Clidoderma
color:pliocene bar:NAM30 from:-5.332 till:0 text:Glyptocephalus
color:pliocene bar:NAM31 from:-5.332 till:0 text:Limanda
color:pliocene bar:NAM32 from:-5.332 till:0 text:Lyopsetta
color:pliocene bar:NAM33 from:-5.332 till:0 text:Pegusa
color:pleistocene bar:NAM34 from:-2.588 till:-0.0117 text:Chibapsetta
color:pleistocene bar:NAM35 from:-2.588 till:0 text:Eopsetta
color:pleistocene bar:NAM36 from:-2.588 till:0 text:Isopsetta
color:pleistocene bar:NAM37 from:-2.588 till:0 text:Parophrys
color:pleistocene bar:NAM38 from:-2.588 till:0 text:Symphurus
PlotData=
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark: width:25
bar:period
from: -65.5 till: -55.8 color:paleocene text:Paleocene
from: -55.8 till: -33.9 color:eocene text:Eocene
from: -33.9 till: -23.03 color:oligocene text:Oligocene
from: -23.03 till: -5.332 color:miocene text:Miocene
from: -5.332 till: -2.588 color:pliocene text:Plio.
from: -2.588 till: -0.0117 color:pleistocene text:Pleist.
from: -0.0117 till: 0 color:holocene text:H.
bar:era
from: -65.5 till: -23.03 color:paleogene text:Paleogene
from: -23.03 till: -2.588 color:neogene text:Neogene
from: -2.588 till: 0 color:quaternary text:Q.