Perverting the course of justice
Perverting the course of justice is an offence committed when a person interferes with the administration of justice. In England and Wales it is a common law offence, carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Statutory versions of the offence exist in Australia, Canada, Fiji, Ireland, and New Zealand. The Scottish equivalent is defeating the ends of justice, although charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice are also raised in Scotland, while the South African counterpart is defeating or obstructing the course of justice. A similar concept, obstruction of justice, exists in United States law.
England and Wales
Doing an act tending and intending to pervert the course of public justice is an offence under the common law of England and Wales.Perverting the course of justice can include acts such as:
- Fabricating or disposing of evidence
- Intimidating or threatening a witness or juror
- Intimidating or threatening a judge
- Conspiring with another to pervert the course of justice, and
- Intending to pervert the course of justice
- Perverting the course of justice
- Interfering with the administration of justice
- Obstructing the administration of justice
- Obstructing the course of justice
- Defeating the due course of justice
- Defeating the ends of justice
- Effecting a public mischief
This offence is also sometimes referred to as "attempting to pervert the course of justice". This is potentially misleading. An attempt to pervert the course of justice is a substantive common law offence and not an inchoate offence. It is not a form of the offence of attempt, and it would be erroneous to charge it as being contrary to section 1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981.
This offence is triable only on indictment.
Canada
In Canada, the equivalent offence is referred to as "obstructing justice". It is set out in § 139 of the Criminal Code:Australia
In New South Wales, the equivalent offence is set out in Section 319 of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty is 14 years' imprisonment. In 1985 Murray Farquhar, the former Chief Stipendiary Magistrate of New South Wales, was convicted of attempting to pervert the course of justice to have charges against Kevin Humphreys dismissed and sentenced to a maximum of four years in prison. In 2009 Marcus Einfeld, a former Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, was sentenced to a maximum of three years in prison after pleading guilty to making a false statement with intent to pervert the course of justice.International Criminal Court
In 2020, International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda described attempted interference with ICC witnesses in the Kenya investigation as perverting the course of justice under Article 70 of the Rome Statute, which defines the legal context of the ICC. Arrest warrants were issued against three people for their alleged attempts to make witnesses withdraw statements or refuse to testify to the court.Notable convictions
- Jonathan Aitken, a politician and British government cabinet ministerperjury and perverting the course of justice
- Jeffrey Archer, an English author and former politicianperjury and perverting the course of justice
- Ali Dizaei, a former Police ranks of [the United Kingdom|commander] in London's Metropolitan Police Serviceinitially found guilty of perverting the course of justice and jailed; later released on appeal; subsequently re-convicted
- Chris Huhne, a journalist and former British government cabinet minister and his former wife, Vicky Pryceperverting the course of justice
- John Humble, a former labourerperverting the course of justice
- Bruce Hyman, an English barristerperverting the course of justice
- Karen Matthews and Michael Donovanfound guilty of kidnapping, false imprisonment, and perverting the course of justice
- Marcus Einfeld, an Australian retired Federal Court and NSW, WA and ACT Supreme Court judgeperjury and perverting the course of justice, for lying relative to a speeding ticket
- Lionel Murphy, an Australian former politician and High Court of Australia judgeinitially found guilty of perverting the course of justice; the NSW Appeal Court subsequently quashed the conviction and ordered a retrial; subsequently found not guilty