Myth


Myth is a genre of folklore consisting primarily of narratives that play a fundamental role in a society. For scholars, this is totally different from the ordinary sense of the term myth, meaning a belief that is not true, as the veracity of a piece of folklore is entirely irrelevant to determining whether it constitutes a myth.
Myths are often endorsed by religious and secular authorities, and may be natural or supernatural in character. Many societies group their myths, legends, and history together, considering myths and legends to be factual accounts of their remote past. In particular, creation myths take place in a primordial age when the world had not achieved its later form. Origin myths explain how a society's customs, institutions, and taboos were established and sanctified. National myths are narratives about a nation's past that symbolize the nation's values. There is a complex relationship between recital of myths and the enactment of rituals.

Etymology

The word myth comes from Ancient Greek μῦθος, meaning 'speech', 'narrative', or 'fiction'. In turn, Ancient Greek μυθολογία combines the word with the suffix -λογία. Accordingly, Plato used as a general term for fiction or story-telling of any kind. This word was adapted into other European languages in the early 19th century, in a much narrower sense, as a scholarly term for " traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining a natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events."
The Greek term was then borrowed into Late Latin, occurring in the title of Latin author Fabius Planciades Fulgentius' 5th-century Mythologiæ to denote what is now referred to as classical mythology—i.e., Greco-Roman etiological stories involving their gods. Fulgentius's Mythologiæ explicitly treated its subject matter as allegories requiring interpretation and not as true events. The Latin term was then adopted in Middle French as mythologie. Whether from French or Latin usage, English adopted the word mythology in the 15th century, initially meaning 'the exposition of a myth or myths', 'the interpretation of fables', or 'a book of such expositions'. The word is first attested in John Lydgate's Troy Book.
From Lydgate until the 17th or 18th century, mythology meant a moral, fable, allegory or a parable, or collection of traditional stories, understood to be false. It came eventually to be applied to similar bodies of traditional stories among other polytheistic cultures around the world. Thus mythology entered the English language before myth. Johnson's Dictionary, for example, has an entry for mythology, but not for myth. Indeed, the Greek loanword mythos and Latinate mythus both appeared in English before the first example of myth in 1830.

Protagonists and structure

The main characters in myths are usually non-humans, such as gods, demigods, and other supernatural figures. Others include humans, animals, or combinations in their classification of myth. Stories of everyday humans, although often of leaders of some type, are usually contained in legends, as opposed to myths. Myths are sometimes distinguished from legends in that myths deal with gods, usually have no historical basis, and are set in a world of the remote past, very different from that of the present.

Definitions

Definitions of myth vary to some extent among scholars, though Finnish folklorist Lauri Honko offers a widely-cited definition:
Another definition of myth comes from myth criticism theorist and professor José Manuel Losada. According to Cultural Myth Criticism, the studies of myth must explain and understand "myth from inside", that is, only "as a myth". Losada defines myth as "a functional, symbolic and thematic narrative of one or several extraordinary events with a transcendent, sacred and supernatural referent; that lacks, in principle, historical testimony; and that refers to an individual or collective, but always absolute, cosmogony or eschatology". According to the holistic myth research by assyriologist Annette Zgoll and classic philologist Christian Zgoll, "A myth can be defined as an Erzählstoff which is polymorphic through its variants and – depending on the variant – polystratic; an Erzählstoff in which transcending interpretations of what can be experienced are combined into a hyleme sequence with an implicit claim to relevance for the interpretation and mastering of the human condition."
Scholars in other fields use the term myth in varied ways. In a broad sense, the word can refer to any traditional story, popular misconception or imaginary entity.
Though myth and other folklore genres may overlap, myth is often thought to differ from genres such as legend and folktale in that neither are considered to be sacred narratives. Some kinds of folktales, such as fairy stories, are not considered true by anyone, and may be seen as distinct from myths for this reason. Main characters in myths are usually gods, demigods or supernatural humans, while legends generally feature humans as their main characters. Many exceptions and combinations exist, as in the Iliad, Odyssey and Aeneid. Moreover, as stories spread between cultures or as faiths change, myths can come to be considered folktales, their divine characters recast as either as humans or demihumans such as giants, elves and faeries. Conversely, historical and literary material may acquire mythological qualities over time. For example, the Matter of Britain and the Matter of France, seem distantly to originate in historical events of the 5th and 8th centuries, respectively, and became mythologised over the following centuries.
In colloquial use, myth can also be used of a collectively held belief that has no basis in fact, or any false story. This usage, which is often pejorative, arose from labelling the religious myths and beliefs of other cultures as incorrect, but it has spread to cover non-religious beliefs as well.
As commonly used by folklorists and academics in other relevant fields, such as anthropology, myth has no implication whether the narrative may be understood as true or otherwise. Among biblical scholars of both the Old and New Testament, the word myth has a technical meaning, in that it usually refers to "describe the actions of the other‐worldly in terms of this world" such as the Creation and the Fall.
Since myth is popularly used to describe stories that are not objectively true, the identification of a narrative as a myth can be highly controversial. Many religious adherents believe that the narratives told in their respective religious traditions are historical without question, and so object to their identification as myths while labelling traditional narratives from other religions as such. Hence, some scholars may label all religious narratives as "myths" for practical reasons, such as to avoid depreciating any one tradition because cultures interpret each other differently relative to one another. Other scholars may abstain from using the term myth altogether for purposes of avoiding placing pejorative overtones on sacred narratives.

Related terms

Mythology

In present use, mythology usually refers to the collection of myths of a group of people. For example, Greek mythology, Roman mythology, Celtic mythology and Hittite mythology all describe the body of myths retold among those cultures.
"Mythology" can also refer to the study of myths and mythologies.

Mythography

The compilation or description of myths is sometimes known as "mythography", a term also used for a scholarly anthology of myths or of the study of myths generally.
Key mythographers in the Classical tradition include:
Other prominent mythographies include the thirteenth-century Prose Edda attributed to the Icelander Snorri Sturluson, which is the main surviving survey of Norse Mythology from the Middle Ages.
Jeffrey G. Snodgrass has termed India's Bhats as mythographers.

Myth criticism

Myth criticism is a system of anthropological interpretation of culture created by French philosopher Gilbert Durand. Scholars have used myth criticism to explain the mythical roots of contemporary fiction, which means that modern myth criticism needs to be interdisciplinary. Traditional myth critics like Georges Dumézil, Hans Blumenberg, Kurt Hübner, and Pierre Brunel have created paradigmatic systems and clarified the meanings of myths within their original sources, evolution, and con texts.

Cultural Myth Criticism

Cultural Myth Criticism is a recent theoretical proposal in the myth criticism studies, set out in José Manuel Losada′s Mitocrítica cultural. Una definición del mito – a book in which he presents his own methodological, hermeneutic, and epistemological approach to myth. Drawing on mythopoetic perspectives, Cultural Myth Criticism takes a step further, incorporating the study of myth′s transcendent dimension in order to assess myth’s role as a mirror of contemporary culture. It examines the functions of myth and the factors that shape its study, and it develops the criteria for analysing it. The approach also takes into account the contemporary factors that affect the interpretation of mythology, such as globalisation, relativism, and immanence:
  • Globalisation – its tendency to favour uniformity over cultural diversity makes it harder to preserve myths.
  • Relativism – its insistence that everything is filtered through one′s individual perspective and its tendency to reinterpret myths within contemporary contexts challenge the traditional values embedded in them.
  • Immanence – the modern world tends to deny myth′s intrinsic transcendence and to impose immanent readings, confining these narratives to the realistic world of the present.
Without abandoning symbolic analysis, Cultural Myth Criticism extends to all cultural manifestations and addresses the difficulties of understanding myth today. It studies mythical manifestations in fields such as literature, film and television, theater, sculpture, painting, video games, music, dancing, the Internet and other artistic fields. The approach is intended to adapt to the contemporary world.
Cultural Myth Criticism should rest on five main pillars::
  1. Cultural myth criticism must be nomothetic – myths often share themes, causes and effects. This makes it possible to identify a myth’s general structure and analyse it more thoroughly.
  2. Cultural myth criticism must be historical – it should bring together different periods of time.
  3. Cultural myth criticism must be philosophical – it should proceed in line with phenomenological philosophy.
  4. Cultural myth criticism must be attentive to the numinous or divine – it should explore the supernatural dimension of myth.
  5. Cultural myth criticism must be philological – a necessary field of study when seeking meaning in myth.
The difference between the classical myth criticism and Cultural Myth Criticism lies in their methodologies. The latter focuses on how contemporary factors shape our perception, seeking to "synthesise the evolution of myths within the complex contemporary context – tracking their origins, development, and processes of demystification and remythification". Losada therefore sets out to design a rigorous methodology for Cultural Myth Criticism that makes the process as inquisitive as possible. The aim is not only to analyse myth from a contemporary perspective, but also to analyse the contemporary world through myth – a bidirectional approach