Lieu de mémoire
A lieu de mémoire is a physical place or object which acts as container of memory. They are thus a form of memorialisation related to collective memory, stating that certain places, objects or events can have special significance related to group's remembrance. It is a term used in heritage and collective memory studies popularised by the French historian Pierre Nora in his three-volume collection Les Lieux de Mémoire. Nora describes them as “complex things. At once natural and artificial, simple and ambiguous, concrete and abstract, they are lieux—places, sites, causes—in three senses—material, symbolic and functional”.
Definition
In Nora's words, "A lieu de mémoire is any significant entity, whether material or non-material in nature, which by dint of human will or the work of time has become a symbolic element of the memorial heritage of any community " It may refer to any place, object or concept vested with historical significance in the popular collective memory, such as a monument, a museum, an event, a symbol like a flag or the French figure Marianne, even a colour vested with historical memory. According to La Commission franco-québécoise sur les lieux de mémoire communs a lieu de mémoire signifies the cultural landmarks, places, practices and expressions stemming from a shared past, whether material or intangible. Nora follow's Lefebrve's discussions of the social production of space.As sites of memory became better known and made official by governments, they can tend to homogenize varied local memories. In Nora's words: “In the past, then, there was one national history and there were many particular memories. Today, there is one national memory, but its unity stems from a divided patrimonial demand that is constantly expanding and in search of coherence.” Thus sites of memory may risk becoming "invented traditions".
David Frier, using the example of the Estádio Nacional in Lisbon, argues that sites of memory can be adaptable.
The concept has been listed in Le Grand Robert de la langue française, the authoritative French dictionary, and studied by scholars and others. There are attempts made to map sites of memory globally. Quebec and France have a joint commission to identify and codify sites of memory. An International Coalition of Sites of Conscience of more than 200 museums, monuments and other institutions around the world uses the concept to group "sites, individuals, and initiatives activating the power of places of memory to engage the public in connecting past and present in order to envision and shape a more just and humane future."
Criticism
Legg argues that Nora's notion of memory is a passive one, overriden by officially sanctioned history; but even Nora recognises the multiple different memories brought into the present. Legg also criticises Nora's over-emphasis of the nation.Olick and Robbins have criticised the use of the term. They argue that lieu de mémoire is a redundant concept because everything can be considered to hold memory. However, Marschall responds that the term is useful because it highlights that memory is always attached to real sites.
Calling attention to the importance of "social forgetting", historian Guy Beiner has argued that "there is an evident need for major historical studies of lieux d’oubli to counterbalance the studies of lieux de mémoire."