Henri Lefebvre
Henri Lefebvre was a French Marxist philosopher and sociologist, best known for furthering the critique of everyday life, for introducing the concepts of the right to the city and the production of social space, and for his work on dialectical materialism, alienation, and criticism of Stalinism, existentialism, and structuralism. In his prolific career, Lefebvre wrote more than sixty books and three hundred articles. He founded or took part in the founding of several intellectual and academic journals such as Philosophies, La Revue Marxiste, Arguments, Socialisme ou Barbarie, and Espaces et Sociétés.
Biography
Lefebvre was born in Hagetmau, Landes, France. He studied philosophy at the Aix-Marseille University and the University of Paris, graduating with a in 1920. By 1924 he was working with Paul Nizan, Norbert Guterman, Georges Friedmann, Georges Politzer, and Pierre Morhange in the Philosophies group seeking a "philosophical revolution". This brought them into contact with the Surrealists, Dadaists, and other groups, before they moved towards the French Communist Party. During the 1920s, Lefebvre worked various jobs including as a taxi driver, before he secured a teaching appointment at the lycée in Privas in 1929, moving on to Montargis in 1932 and to Saint-Étienne in 1940.Lefebvre joined the PCF in 1928 and became one of the most prominent French Marxist intellectuals during the second quarter of the 20th century, before joining the French resistance. He wrote a series of works on the history of ideas and sought to establish Karl Marx as a philosopher figure; it was through his introductory texts that Louis Althusser and Albert Camus first encountered Marx. Among his works was a highly influential, anti-Stalinist text on dialectics titled Dialectical Materialism. Under the Vichy regime, he had his teacher's licence revoked by Jérôme Carcopino's Ministry of Education on 11 March 1941 on account of his political views and PCF membership, and worked with Georges-Henri Rivière on ethnographic projects concerning rural crafts for the Musée national des Arts et Traditions Populaires in the Pyrenees until 1946. From September 1945 to 1949, he was the director of Radiodiffusion Française, a French radio broadcaster in Toulouse, and from 1947 he taught at a high school in the same city. In 1947, he published the first volume of his major work The Critique of Everyday Life.
Aiming for an academic career to secure time for his writing, Lefebvre considered Maurice Halbwachs as a potential thesis advisor in the first post-war years, then failed to persuade the Toulouse University geographer Daniel Faucher to accept a sociological thesis proposal on the Campan valley in 1946. In April 1948, he unsuccessfully applied for the post vacated by the sociologist Georges Gurvitch at the University of Strasbourg. By 1948, he began doctoral research at the Sorbonne, initially supervised by the geographer. In 1954, he defended his two dissertations under the direction of the sociologist Georges Davy: Les Communautés paysannes pyrénéennes. Étude de sociologie historique and Une République pastorale : la vallée de Campan : Organisation, vie et histoire d'une communauté pyrénéenne.
According to his own recollection, he influenced and became involved with the avant-garde architectural group CoBrA, formed in Paris by Constant Nieuwenhuys, Asger Jorn and others. His early work on method was applauded and borrowed centrally by the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre in Critique of Dialectical Reason. During Lefebvre's thirty-year stint with the PCF, he was chosen to publish critical attacks on opposed theorists, especially existentialists like Sartre and Lefebvre's former colleague Nizan, only to intentionally get himself expelled from the party for his own heterodox theoretical and political opinions in the late 1950s. He then went from serving as a primary intellectual for the PCF to becoming one of France's most important critics of the PCF's politics and intellectual thought.
In 1961, Lefebvre became professor of sociology at the University of Strasbourg, before joining the faculty at the new university at Nanterre in 1965. He was one of the most respected professors, and he had influenced and analysed the May 1968 student revolt. Lefebvre introduced the concept of the right to the city in his 1968 book Le Droit à la ville. Following the publication of this book, Lefebvre wrote several influential works on cities, urbanism, and space, including The Production of Space, which became one of the most influential and heavily cited works of urban theory. By the 1970s, Lefebvre had also published some of the first critical statements on the work of post-structuralists, especially Michel Foucault. During the following years he was involved in the editorial group of Arguments, a New Left magazine which largely served to enable the French public to familiarize themselves with Central European revisionism.
Lefebvre died in 1991. In his obituary, Radical Philosophy magazine honored his long and complex career and influence:
Critique of everyday life
One of Lefebvre's most important contributions to social thought is the idea of the "critique of everyday life", which he pioneered in the 1930s. Lefebvre defined everyday life dialectically as the intersection of "illusion and truth, power and helplessness; the intersection of the sector man controls and the sector he does not control", and is where the perpetually transformative conflict occurs between diverse, specific rhythms: the body's polyrhythmic bundles of natural rhythms, physiological rhythms, and social rhythms. The everyday was, in short, the space in which all life occurred, and between which all fragmented activities took place. It was the residual. While the theme presented itself in many works, it was most notably outlined in his eponymous three-volume study, which came out in individual installments, decades apart, in 1947, 1961, and 1981.Lefebvre argued that everyday life was an underdeveloped sector compared to technology and production, and moreover that in the mid 20th century, capitalism changed such that everyday life was to be colonized. In this zone of everydayness shared by everyone in society regardless of class or specialty, autocritique of everyday realities of boredom vs. societal promises of free time and leisure, could lead to people understanding and then revolutionizing their everyday lives. This was essential to Lefebvre because everyday life was where he saw capitalism surviving and reproducing itself. Without revolutionizing everyday life, capitalism would continue to diminish the quality of everyday life, and inhibit real self-expression. The critique of everyday life was crucial because it was for him only through the development of the conditions of human life—rather than abstract control of productive forces—that humans could reach a concrete utopian existence.
Lefebvre's work on everyday life was heavily influential in French theory, particularly for the Situationists, as well as in politics. The third volume has also recently influenced scholars writing about digital technology and information in the present day, since it has a section dealing with this topic at length, including analysis of the ; key aspects of information theory; and other general discussion of the "colonisation" of everyday life through information communication technologies as "devices" or "services".
Social production of space
Lefebvre dedicated a great deal of his philosophical writings to understanding the importance of space in what he called the reproduction of social relations of production. This idea is the central argument in the book The Survival of Capitalism, written as a sort of prelude to La Production de l'espace .Lefebvre contends that there are different modes of production of space from natural space to more complex spaces and flows whose meaning is produced in a social way. Lefebvre analyzes each historical mode as a three-part dialectic between everyday practices and perceptions, representations or theories of space and the spatial imaginary of the time.
Lefebvre's argument in The Production of Space is that space is a social product, or a complex social construction which affects spatial practices and perceptions. Lefebvre argued that every society—and, therefore, every mode of production—produces a certain space, its own space.
Lefebvre's concept has been criticised: e.g. in The Urban Question, Manuel Castells. Many responses to Castells are provided in The Survival of Capitalism, and some such as Andy Merrifield argue that the acceptance of those critiques in the academic world would be a motive for Lefebvre's effort in writing the long and theoretically dense The Production of Space. In "Actually-Existing Success: Economics, Aesthetics, and the Specificity of Socialist Urbanism," Michal Murawski critiques Lefebvre's dismissal of actually existing socialism by showing how socialist states produced differential space.