John Hudson (historian)


John Geoffrey Henry Hudson is an English medieval historian and Latin translator. He is Professor of Legal History at the University of St Andrews and the William W. Cook Global Law Professor at the University of Michigan Law School. He was educated at Worcester College, Oxford and the University of Toronto.
Hudson specializes in Medieval legal history. He is the author of The Oxford History of the Laws of England Volume II 871-1216. He is also known for his monographs on the subject, especially on Anglo-Norman land law, as well as his edition, translation and commentary of the Historia Ecclesie Abbendonensis. In 2006, he gave the Selden Society lecture to mark the centenary of F.W. Maitland's passing. In addition to scholarly books, chapters, articles and lectures, Hudson has also contributed to The Times Literary Supplement.
He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2014. In 2016, Hudson was elected to the British Academy.

Books

Land, Law, and Lordship in Anglo-Norman England The Formation of the English Common Law "Pollock and Maitland": Centenary Essays on the "History of English Law" The History of the Church of Abingdon, 2 vols, F. W. Maitland and the Englishness of English Law
  • ''The Oxford History of the Laws of England Volume II 871-1216''

In popular culture

In a 2006 poll by BBC History magazine for "worst Briton" of the previous millennium, Hudson's nominee for worst Briton of the 12th century, the murdered Archbishop of Canterbury Saint Thomas Becket, came second behind Jack the Ripper. The poll was dismissed as "daft" in The Guardian, and the result disputed by Anglicans and Catholics. Historians had nominated one person per century, and for the 12th century John Hudson chose Becket for being "greedy", "hypocritical", "founder of gesture politics" and "master of the soundbite". The BBC website also quoted Hudson as saying "Those who share my prejudice against Becket may consider his assassination... a fittingly grisly end." The BBC History magazine editor suggested most other nominees were too obscure for voters.