Phonological history of English consonant clusters
The phonological history of English includes various changes in the phonology of consonant clusters.
H-cluster reductions
The H-cluster reductions are various consonant reductions that have occurred in the history of English, involving consonant clusters beginning with that have lost the in some or all dialects.Reductions of /hw/
The cluster has been subject to two kinds of reduction:- Reduction to before rounded vowels. This occurred with the word how in the Old English period, and with who, whom and whose in Middle English.
- Reduction to, a development that has affected the speech of the great majority of English speakers, causing them to pronounce ⟨wh-⟩ the same as ⟨w-⟩. The distinction is maintained, however, in Scotland, most of Ireland, and some Southern American English.
Reduction of /hl/, /hr/ and /hn/
Reduction of /hj/
In some dialects of English the cluster is reduced to, leading to pronunciations like for huge and for human, and making hew, hue, and Hugh homophones of ewe, yew, and you. This is sometimes considered a type of glide cluster reduction, but it is much less widespread than wh-reduction, and is generally stigmatized where it is found. Aside from accents with general H-dropping, in the United States this reduction is mostly found in accents of Philadelphia and New York City; it also occurs in Cork accents of Irish English. In other dialects of English, hew and yew remain distinct; however, the cluster of hew, human, etc. is often reduced from to just .Y-cluster reductions
Y-cluster reductions are reductions of clusters ending with the palatal approximant, which is the sound of in yes, and is sometimes referred to as "yod", from the Hebrew letter yod, which has the sound. Many such clusters arose in dialects in which the falling diphthong became the rising diphthong. They were thus often found before the vowel, as in cube – which was in some cases modified to or before , as in cure, or weakened to or as in argument. They also occurred in words ending in -ion and -ious, such as nation and precious.This change from to, which had occurred in London by the end of the 17th century, did not take place in all dialects. A few dialects, notably in Wales, as well as in some parts of northern England, New England, and the American South, still retain a diphthong where standard English has – these dialects therefore lack the clusters with and have not been subject to the reductions described here.
The diphthongs or are most commonly indicated by the spellings,, , and, as in feud, few, mute, cue and suit, while the historical monophthong is commonly indicated by the spellings and, as in moon and soup.
Yod-dropping
Yod-dropping is the elision of the from certain syllable-initial clusters of the type described above. Particular cases of yod-dropping may affect all or some of the dialects that have the relevant clusters.The change of to in these positions produced some clusters which would have been difficult or impossible to pronounce, which led to what John Wells calls "early yod dropping" in which the was elided in the following environments:
- After, for example chute, chew, juice
- After, for example yew
- After, for example rude
- After stop+ clusters, for example blue
Many varieties of English have extended yod-dropping to the following environments if the is in the same syllable as the preceding consonant:
- After, for example
The lack of yod-dropping in those contexts has occasionally been held to be a shibboleth distinguishing Canadians from Americans. However, in a survey conducted in the Golden Horseshoe area of Southern Ontario in 1994, over 80% of respondents under the age of 40 pronounced student and news without yod.
Image:Iw-uw merger.svg|thumb|The areas marked in pink show where in the United States a distinction between in dew and in do may be made.
General American thus undergoes yod-dropping after all alveolar consonants. A few accents of American English, such as working-class Southern American English, however, preserve the distinction in pairs like do/dew because, like in the Welsh English dialects discussed above, they retain a diphthong in words in which RP has :,, etc.
However, in words like annual, menu, volume, Matthew, continue, etc., with a syllable break before the, there is no yod-dropping. The same applies accordingly to British and other accents; the yod is often dropped after initial, for example, but it is not dropped in words like volume or value.
Additionally, there is no in British pronunciations of coupon and Pulitzer, and respectively, but many American speakers keep the yod, realizing them as and, although Pulitzer with the pew sound is widely incorrect.
In New Zealand and to some extent Australian English, debut is mainly pronounced without the yod as.
Yod-dropping after,, and was also a traditional feature of Cockney speech, which continues to be the case after, but now, after and, yod-coalescence is now more common.
Some East Anglian accents such as Norfolk dialect extend yod-dropping not only to the position after, or but also to the position after nonalveolar consonants as well: pairs like beauty/booty, mute/moot, cute/coot'' can then be homophonous. A well-known series of British television advertisements beginning in the 1980s featured Bernard Matthews, who was from Norfolk and described his turkeys as "bootiful". Such accents pronounce a in words like "use", "unit", etc. only if there is no consonant before the.
| IPA | Notes | ||
| brewed | brood | - | |
| brume | broom | - | |
| chews | choose | - | |
| chute | shoot | - | |
| drupe | droop | - | |
| rheum | room | - | |
| rude | rood | - | |
| rue | roo | - | |
| ruse | roos | - | |
| threw | through | - | |
| yew | you | - | |
| yule | you'll | - |
| IPA | Notes | ||
| adieu | ado | - | |
| dew | do | - | |
| Dewar | doer | - | |
| due | do | - | |
| dune | Doon | - | |
| knew | nu | - | |
| new | nu | - | |
| tune | toon | - |
Yod-coalescence
Yod-coalescence is a process that fuses the clusters into the sibilants respectively. The first two are examples of affrication.Unlike yod-dropping, yod-coalescence frequently occurs with clusters that would be considered to span a syllable boundary and so commonly occurs before unstressed syllables. For example, in educate, the cluster would not usually be subject to yod-dropping in General American, as the is assigned to the previous syllable, but it commonly coalesces to. Here are a few examples of yod-coalescence universal in all English dialects:
- in most words ending -ture, such as nature
- in soldier
- in words ending with -ssure such as pressure
- in words ending vowel+sure such as measure
- educate
- azure
- issue , the intermediate form being also common
In certain English accents, yod-coalescence also occurs in stressed syllables, as in tune and dune. That occurs in Australian, Cockney, Estuary English, Zimbabwean English, some speakers of Hiberno-English, Newfoundland English, South African English, and to a certain extent in New Zealand English, RP, many speakers in Scottish English, and even some varieties of English in Asia, like Philippine English. That results in pronunciations such as the following:
- dew/due
- tune
- resume
- assume
Yod-coalescence has traditionally been resisted in Received Pronunciation. It has certainly become established in words of the first group listed above, but it is not yet universal in those of the second group, and it does not generally occur in those of the third group.
| IPA | Notes | ||
| deuce | juice | - | |
| dew | Jew | - | |
| dewed | Jude | - | |
| dual | jewel | - | |
| due | Jew | - | |
| duel | jewel | - | |
| duke | juke | - | |
| duly | Julie | - | |
| dune | June | - | |
| duty | Judy | With intervocalic alveolar flapping. | |
| sue | shoe | - | |
| sue | shoo | - | |
| suit | chute | - | |
| suit | shoot | - | |
| 'tude | chewed | - |
See also
- List of yod-dropping and coalescence homophones on Wiktionary.