List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 132


This is a list of cases reported in volume 132 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1889 and 1890.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 132 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in volume 132 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville FullerChief JusticeIllinoisMorrison Waite


July 4, 1910
Samuel Freeman MillerAssociate JusticeIowaPeter Vivian Daniel


October 13, 1890
Stephen Johnson FieldAssociate JusticeCalifornianewly created seat


December 1, 1897
Joseph P. BradleyAssociate JusticeNew Jerseynewly created seat


January 22, 1892
John Marshall HarlanAssociate JusticeKentuckyDavid Davis


October 14, 1911
Horace GrayAssociate JusticeMassachusettsNathan Clifford


September 15, 1902
Samuel BlatchfordAssociate JusticeNew YorkWard Hunt


July 7, 1893
Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus LamarAssociate JusticeMississippiWilliam Burnham Woods


January 23, 1893
David Josiah BrewerAssociate JusticeKansasStanley Matthews


March 28, 1910

Notable Case in 132 U.S.

''Smith v. Bolles''

Smith v. Bolles,, was an action to recover out-of-pocket damages for alleged fraudulent representations in the sale of shares of mining stock. The case is important in contract law, as to legal remedies and compensating expectancies. The Supreme Court held that the measure of damages is not the difference between the contract price and the fair market value if the property had been properly represented, but rather what the plaintiff had lost by being deceived into making the purchase.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 132 U.S.

Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower CourtDisposition
Metropolitan R.R. Co. v. District of ColumbiaBradleynonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.reversed
Knox Cnty. v. HarshmanFullernonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.supersedeas denied
Robertson v. Frank Bros. Co.BradleynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Jackson v. AllenFullernonenoneC.C.E.D. La.reversed
Campbell v. WadeFieldnonenoneTex.affirmed
Brush v. ConditBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Dent v. FergusonLamarnonenoneC.C.W.D. Tenn.reversed
Thompson v. White W.V.R.R. Co.FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Ind.affirmed
Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. MillerBlatchfordnonenonePhila. Cnty. Ct. Com. Pl.affirmed
Aron v. Manhattan Ry. Co.BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Keystone M.I. Co. v. MartinBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.dismissed
Day v. Fair Haven & W. Ry. Co.FullernonenoneC.C.D. Conn.affirmed
Roemer v. NeumannGraynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Scotland Cnty. v. HillHarlannonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.affirmed
Hill v. SumnerMillernonenoneC.C.D. Colo.affirmed
Smith v. BollesFullernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohioreversed
Cross v. North CarolinaHarlannonenoneN.C.affirmed
First Nat'l Bank v. MorganHarlannonenoneN.C.affirmed
Boylan v. Hot Springs R.R. Co.GraynonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Glenn v. SumnerGraynonenoneC.C.W.D.N.C.affirmed
Robertson v. GlendinningFullernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Watson v. Cincinnati et al. Ry. Co.FullernonenoneC.C.D. Ind.affirmed
Merritt v. TiffanyFieldnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Anthony v. Louisville & N.R.R. Co.FieldnonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.affirmed
Yazoo et al. R.R. Co. v. ThomasFullernonenoneMiss.affirmed
Yazoo et al. R.R. Co. v. CommissionersFullernonenoneC.C.S.D. Miss.affirmed
Missouri P. Ry. Co. v. Chicago et al. R.R. Co.GraynonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.affirmed
Raimond v. Terrebonne ParishGraynonenoneC.C.E.D. La.affirmed
Marchand v. EmkenBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Royer v. RothBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Cal.affirmed
Winters v. EthellBlatchfordnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Idahodismissed
City of Chanute v. TraderBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Oregon I. Co. v. Excelsior C. Co.BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Cal.reversed
Brown v. RankFullernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Wash.affirmed
Vane v. NewcombeBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Ind.affirmed
Redfield v. ParksMillernonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.reversed
Pickhardt v. MerrittBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Dahl v. RaunheimFieldnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Mont.affirmed
Dahl v. Montana C. Co.FieldnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Mont.affirmed
Young v. Parker's Adm'rFullernonenoneD.W. Va.reversed
United States v. BarlowFieldnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.reversed
Fritts v. PalmerHarlannoneMillerC.C.D. Colo.reversed
City of Cleveland v. KingHarlannonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohioaffirmed
Continental L. Ins. Co. v. ChamberlainHarlannonenoneC.C.N.D. Iowaaffirmed
Roemer v. PeddieBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Cleaveland v. G.C. Richardson & Co.BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
United States v. DavisLamarnonenoneD. Md.affirmed
Bachrack v. NortonBradleynonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.reversed
Young v. Clarendon Twp.LamarnonenoneC.C.E.D. Mich.affirmed
Hastings et al. Co. v. WhitneyLamarnonenoneMinn.affirmed
Klein v. Hoffheimer Bros.MillernonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.affirmed
Bradley v. H.B. Claflin & Co.MillernonenoneC.C.E.D. La.reversed
Ayers v. WatsonMillernonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.reversed
Hume v. United StatesFullernonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Greene v. TaylorBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
McGillin v. BennettBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Robertson v. GerdanBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Robertson v. RosenthalFullernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Pennie v. ReisFieldnonenoneCal.affirmed
Western Union T. Co. v. Alabama Bd. As'mentMillernonenoneAla.reversed
Rio Grande R.R. Co. v. GomilaFieldnonenoneC.C.E.D. La.reversed
Dravo v. FabelHarlannonenoneC.C.W.D. Pa.affirmed
Robertson v. BradburyBradleynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Muller v. NortonLamarnonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.reversed
Idaho et al. Co. v. BradburyGraynonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Idahoaffirmed
Singer Mfg. Co. v. RahnGraynonenoneC.C.D. Minn.affirmed
Sugg v. ThorntonFullernonenoneTex.affirmed
Pacific E. Co. v. MalinFullernonenoneC.C.W.D. Tex.affirmed
Paul v. CullumHarlannonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Ariz.affirmed
Hale v. AkersBlatchfordnonenoneCal.dismissed
Rio Grande R.R. Co. v. VinetMillernonenoneC.C.E.D. La.affirmed
Graves v. CorbinBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Richmond v. BlakeHarlannoneFieldC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Louisville & N.R.R. Co. v. WangelinGraynonenoneC.C.S.D. Ill.affirmed
Avery v. ClearyHarlannonenoneC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Cleary v. Ellis F. Co.HarlannonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Robertson v. EdelhoffBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Patrick v. GrahamMillernonenoneC.C.D. Colo.affirmed
Clayton v. Utah MillernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Utahaffirmed
Jack v. Utah ex rel. DicksonMillernonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Utahaffirmed
United States v. CarrFullernonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Forbes L. Mfg. Co. v. WorthingtonFullernonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Miller v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.BradleynonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.affirmed
Hill v. WoosterBlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Vt.reversed