Turncoat


A turncoat, also known as a turncloak, is a person who shifts allegiance from one loyalty or ideal to another, betraying or deserting an original cause by switching to the opposing side or party. In political and social history, this is distinct from being a traitor, as the switch mostly takes place under the following circumstances:
  • In groups, often driven by one or more leaders.
  • When the goal that formerly motivated and benefited the person becomes either no longer feasible or too costly even if success is achieved.
  • Remaining an active participant, usually on the same basis, e.g. combatant or politician as opposed to surrender or ceasing activity as a defector.
  • Ostensibly open and honestly intentioned for a cause, as opposed to material personal gain or espionage of treachery.
From a military perspective, opposing armies generally wear uniforms of contrasting colors to prevent incidents of friendly fire. Thus the term "turn-coat" indicates that an individual has changed sides and his uniform coat to one matching the color of his former enemy.

Historical context

Even in a modern historical context "turncoat" is often synonymous with the term "renegade", a term of religious origins having its origins in the Latin word "renegare". Historical currents of great magnitude have periodically caught masses of people, along with their leaders, in their wake. In such a dire situation, new perspectives on past actions are laid bare and the question of personal treason becomes muddled. One example would be the situation that led to the Act of Abjuration or Plakkaat van Verlatinghe, signed on July 26, 1581, in the Netherlands, an instance where changing sides was given a positive meaning.
The first written use of the term meaning was by J. Foxe in Actes & Monuments in 1570: "One who changes his principles or party; a renegade; an apostate." Cited 1571*
"Turncoat" could also have a more literal origin. According to the Rotuli Chartarum 1199–1216 two barons changed fealty from William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke, to King John. In other words, they turned their coats from one lord to another, hence turncoat.

Process

The term is often used in the context of military or political conflict. Turncoats may be driven by necessity or force in regime changes or personal motives such as connections with members of the other party or individual moral or intellectual development or interest, among other reasons.
Turncoats may face additional scrutiny or skepticism after defection from their new allies due to stigma against turncoats and their perceived untrustworthiness or due to their identity. In certain countries, individuals and organizations have actively investigated turncoats for crimes of defection, treason, or other charges.

Examples

There were many turncoats in history, including: