Anderson localization
In condensed matter physics, Anderson localization is the absence of diffusion of waves in a disordered medium. This phenomenon is named after the American physicist P. W. Anderson, who was the first to suggest that electron localization is possible in a lattice potential, provided that the degree of randomness in the lattice is sufficiently large, as can be realized for example in a semiconductor with impurities or defects.
Anderson localization is a general wave phenomenon that applies to the transport of electromagnetic waves, acoustic waves, quantum waves, spin waves, etc. This phenomenon is to be distinguished from weak localization, which is the precursor effect of Anderson localization, and from Mott localization, named after Sir Nevill Mott, where the transition from metallic to insulating behaviour is not due to disorder, but to a strong mutual Coulomb repulsion of electrons.
Introduction
In the original Anderson tight-binding model, the evolution of the wave function ψ on the d-dimensional lattice Zd is given by the Schrödinger equationwhere the Hamiltonian H is given by
where are lattice locations. The self-energy is taken as random and independently distributed. The interaction potential is required to fall off faster than in the limit. For example, one may take uniformly distributed within a band of energies and
Starting with localized at the origin, one is interested in how fast the probability distribution diffuses. Anderson's analysis shows the following:
- If is 1 or 2 and is arbitrary, or if and is sufficiently large, then the probability distribution remains localized: uniformly in. This phenomenon is called Anderson localization.
- If and is small, where D is the diffusion constant.
Analysis
The phenomenon of Anderson localization, particularly that of weak localization, finds its origin in the wave interference between multiple-scattering paths. In the strong scattering limit, the severe interferences can completely halt the waves inside the disordered medium.For non-interacting electrons, a highly successful approach was put forward in 1979 by Abrahams et al. This scaling hypothesis of localization suggests that a disorder-induced metal-insulator transition exists for non-interacting electrons in three dimensions at zero magnetic field and in the absence of spin-orbit coupling. Much further work has subsequently supported these scaling arguments both analytically and numerically. In 1D and 2D, the same hypothesis shows that there are no extended states and thus no MIT or only an apparent MIT. However, since 2 is the lower critical dimension of the localization problem, the 2D case is in a sense close to 3D: states are only marginally localized for weak disorder and a small spin-orbit coupling can lead to the existence of extended states and thus an MIT. Consequently, the localization lengths of a 2D system with potential-disorder can be quite large so that in numerical approaches one can always find a localization-delocalization transition when either decreasing system size for fixed disorder or increasing disorder for fixed system size.
Most numerical approaches to the localization problem use the standard tight-binding Anderson Hamiltonian with onsite-potential disorder. Characteristics of the electronic eigenstates are then investigated by studies of participation numbers obtained by exact diagonalization, multifractal properties, level statistics and many others. Especially fruitful is the transfer-matrix method which allows a direct computation of the localization lengths and further validates the scaling hypothesis by a numerical proof of the existence of a one-parameter scaling function. Direct numerical solution of Maxwell equations to demonstrate Anderson localization of light has been implemented.
Recent work has proposed that a non-interacting Anderson localized system can become many-body localized even in the presence of weak interactions. The vanishing of conductivity has been rigorously proven for a particular 1D system, but rare Griffith's regions of lower average disorder are thought to destabilize localization in higher dimensions.
Experimental evidence
Anderson localization can be observed in a perturbed periodic potential where the transverse localization of light is caused by random fluctuations on a photonic lattice. Experimental realizations of transverse localization were reported for a 2D lattice and a 1D lattice. Transverse Anderson localization of light has also been demonstrated in an optical fiber medium and a biological medium, and has also been used to transport images through the fiber. It has also been observed by localization of a Bose–Einstein condensate in a 1D disordered optical potential.In 3D, observations are more rare. Anderson localization of elastic waves in a 3D disordered medium has been reported. The observation of the MIT has been reported in a 3D model with atomic matter waves. The MIT, associated with the nonpropagative electron waves has been reported in a cm-sized crystal. Random lasers can operate using this phenomenon.
The existence of Anderson localization for light in 3D was debated for years and remains unresolved today. Reports of Anderson localization of light in 3D random media were complicated by the competing/masking effects of absorption and/or fluorescence. Recent experiments support theoretical predictions that the vector nature of light prohibits the transition to Anderson localization.