Selenicereus costaricensis
Selenicereus costaricensis, synonym Hylocereus costaricensis, known as the Costa Rican pitahaya or Costa Rica nightblooming cactus, is a cactus species native to Central America and north-eastern South America. The species is grown commercially for its fruit, called pitaya or pitahaya, but is also an impressive ornamental vine with huge flowers. The species may not be distinct from Selenicereus monacanthus.
Description
- Stem scandent, 1-3 cm wide, usually very thick; ribs 3, margins straight to shallowly scallop-lobed; internodes 2-3.5 x 0.1-0.2cm; often folded, areoles on prominences, bearing dense, short wool and 3-6 short, dark spines 2–4mm, hairs 2, often bristle-like, soon dropping; epidermis grayish green, +- glaucous in fresh material.
- Flowers funnel-shaped, 22–30cm long, strongly perfumed, young buds globular; cylindric-ovoid, ca 4cm long, bracteoles narrow, foliaceous, numerous, imbricate, 1–2cm long; receptacle stout, 10–15cm, throat obconic, 6cm in wide at the orifice, bracteoles foliaceous, persistent, particularly imbricating towards the base, green with purple margins; tepals 11–15cm, the outer greenish yellow, the inner white; stigma lobes ca. 12, not forked; ovary covered with large, broadly to narrowly triangular, overlapping bracteoles, 0.5–3cm.
- Fruit broadly ovate to globose, bright magenta, pupla purple; seeds pear-shaped, black, ca 1mm.
Taxonomy
Both the identity and the nomenclature of the species have been problematic. The name Cereus trigonus var. costaricensis was first published by Frédéric Weber in 1902. The epithet costaricensis refers to Costa Rica, where it is native. The plant Weber described had a triangular stem-like Cereus trigonus, but was "distinguished by its more glaucous stem and especially by its fruit, just as big but more spherical, less scaly, and filled with a crimson pulp of a very delicate taste." It was said to be highly sought after in Costa Rica for its fruit, known as pitahaya. Weber mentioned a photograph of the plant, but as of 2017 this had not been located, so the name lacked a type. In 1909, Britton and Rose transferred the plant to the genus Hylocereus and raised it to a full species as Hylocereus costaricensis.A molecular phylogenetic study in 2017 confirmed earlier research showing that the genus Hylocereus was nested within Selenicereus, so all the species of Hylocereus were transferred to Selenicereus, with this species becoming Selenicereus costaricensis. However, in the absence of a type, the names remained problematic. In 2021, a lectotype was designated, and the name was accepted by the International Plant Names Index and Plants of the World Online.
The species has been described as "poorly understood". The name Hylocereus costaricensis has been treated as synonymous with Hylocereus polyrhizus; however, H. polyrhizus is regarded by other sources as a synonym of Selenicereus monacanthus. The relationship between S. costaricensis and S. monacanthus, and in particular whether they are separate species, requires further study.