Regnal years of English and British monarchs

Regnal years are utilised in many official British government and legal documents of historical interest, notably parliamentary statutes prior to 1963, and prior to 1867 in the case law collected in the year books, nominative reporters, and digests, and in the reports republished in the English Reports and Revised Reports.

Overview

For centuries, English official public documents have been dated according to the regnal years of the ruling monarch. Traditionally, parliamentary statutes are referenced by regnal year, e.g. the Occasional Conformity Act 1711 is officially referenced as "10 Ann. c. 6".
Regnal years are calculated from the official date of a monarch's accession. For example, King George III acceded on 25 October 1760. That marks the beginning of his first regnal year. His second regnal year starts on 25 October 1761, his third regnal year on 25 October 1762, and so on. When a monarch dies, abdicates or is deposed, the regnal year comes to an end. A new regnal year begins from a new date, with a new monarch.
As different monarchs begin their reigns at different times, the exact month and day when a regnal year begins varies across reigns. For example, Elizabeth I's regnal year starts on 17 November, James I's on 24 March, Charles I's on 27 March, and so on.
The table below gives the dates of the regnal years for Kings of England, from 1066 to the present day. These are official de jure dates, and may or may not coincide with whether a particular king had de facto power or not at that time. For example, as the Commonwealth era was suppressed in the official record, the regnal years of Charles II are measured from 30 January 1649 ; as a result, when Charles II actually became king, on 29 May 1660, he was already in his 12th regnal year.
Regnal years on the table below are recorded only for Kings of England. These are not regnal years of Kings of Scotland nor Ireland, which have their own regnal dates.

Legal year

The regnal year is distinct from the official "legal year" – that is, the calendar used for legal, civic and ecclesiastical purposes. The legal year also did not always coincide with the start date for the historical year. Until the 13th century, the English legal year began at Christmas. From the 13th century until 1752, the legal year began on 25 March. It is only since 1752 that the legal year was re-set to coincide with the start of the historical calendar year .
These date differences can also be confusing when sorting dates in old documents before 1753. For example, the reign of Charles I came to an end with his execution on 30 January 1649, but contemporary records such as the House of Commons Journals record this as 30 January 1648. To account for this complication, it is customary for historians referring to official or legal events between 1 January and 25 March to write the year down in "double-barreled" format.
The regnal years listed below are given in normal historical date. So a parliamentary statute that was passed on, say, 10 February 1585 would be dated in the official record as 10 February 1584, and simultaneously said to have been passed in the 27th year of Elizabeth I.
Adoption of 1 January as the start date for the year was one of Gregorian calendar reforms introduced by Pope Gregory XIII in 1582, and was quickly adopted in most Catholic countries. Protestant Scotland began using 1 January in 1600. The double-barreled format was commonly used in Dutch documents, as two provinces had adopted the Gregorian reform early, but the remaining provinces of the Netherlands only adopted it later.
Most of the European continent had already transitioned from 25 March to 1 January by the mid-17th century, when there were many English exiles abroad. Use of the double-barreled format begins to occasionally appear in England, both in private and public records, already by the late 17th century. English writers of this era, tended to stick to the 25 March start date, especially if they were writing only for English audiences. Nonetheless, many English periodicals, which exploded in the early 1700s, used the historical year with 1 January start date and did not bother with double-barreling.
The 1751 Act reforming the legal year also officially introduced to England the Gregorian calendar on Thursday 14 September 1752. Up until then, England had been using the Julian calendar, which by that time was eleven days behind the calendar of most countries on the European Continent. So events before 1752 in English records often differ from European records, and it is sometimes necessary to refer to both sets of dates using "Old Style" and "New Style" notation, . By way of calculation, OS was ten days behind NS until 1700, and eleven days behind NS after 1700.

e.g. William of Orange's armada landed in England on 5 November 1688 or 15 November 1688.
e.g. Queen Anne died on 1 August 1714 or 12 August 1714.

Anyone handling old dates need to be cautious with variations. A document dated 5 March 1611 in England would be dated 5 March 1612 in Scotland, 15 March 1612 in France and 5/15 March 1611/12 in the Netherlands.
The dates in the table below follow the English calendar.

Regnal calendar table

To calculate the regnal year from a particular date, one subtracts the first regnal year from the calendar year in question. The year is not adjusted if the month and day falls before the regnal date, and if it falls on or after the regnal date, add one. Finally – for the regnal year of William III after Mary's death – one also adds 6.

Example 1: 4 July 1776. This falls in the reign of George III, whose first regnal year is 1760; so 1776 1760 = 16th year of his reign.
Example 2: 2 May 1662. This is in the reign of Charles II, whose first regnal year is 1649. So 1662 1649 = 13, add 1 because 2 May is after 30 January, so the date falls in the 14th regnal year of Charles II.
Example 3: 31 December 1695. This falls in the reign of William III alone, whose "first" regnal year is 1694; so 1695 1694 = 1, add 1 because 31 December is after 28 December, and also add 6 because the date is after Mary's death, so the date falls in the "8th" year of his reign.

Monarch	No. of years	First regnal year	Regnal year start date	Regnal year end date	End of final year
William I	21	1066	14 October	13 October	9 September 1087
William II	13	1087	26 September	25 September	2 August 1100
Henry I	36	1100	5 August	4 August	1 December 1135
Stephen	19	1135	26 December	25 December	25 October 1154
Henry II	35	1154	19 December	18 December	6 July 1189
Richard I	10	1189	3 September	2 September	6 April 1199
John	18	1199	Ascension Day	varied, May/June	19 October 1216
Henry III	57	1216	28 October	27 October	16 November 1272
Edward I	35	1272	20 November	20 November	7 July 1307
Edward II	20	1307	8 July	7 July	20 January 1327
Edward III	51, 38	1327	25 January	24 January	21 June 1377
Richard II	23	1377	22 June	21 June	29 September 1399
Henry IV	14	1399	30 September	29 September	20 March 1413
Henry V	10	1413	21 March	20 March	31 August 1422
Henry VI	39 + 1	1422	1 September	31 August	4 March 1461
Edward IV	23	1461	4 March	3 March	9 April 1483
Edward V	1	1483	9 April	25 June	25 June 1483
Richard III	3	1483	26 June	25 June	22 August 1485
Henry VII	24	1485	22 August	21 August	21 April 1509
Henry VIII	38	1509	22 April	21 April	28 January 1547
Edward VI	7	1547	28 January	27 January	6 July 1553
Mary I	2	1553	6 July	5 July	24 July 1554
"Philip and Mary"	5 & 6	1554	25 July	24 July	17 November 1558
Elizabeth I	45	1558	17 November	16 November	24 March 1603
James I	23	1603	24 March	23 March	27 March 1625
Charles I	24	1625	27 March	26 March	30 January 1649
Charles II	37	1649	30 January	29 January	6 February 1685
James II	4	1685	6 February	5 February	11 December 1688
"William and Mary"	6	1689	13 February	12 February	27 December 1694
William III	8	1694	28 December	27 December	8 March 1702
Anne	13	1702	8 March	7 March	1 August 1714
George I	13	1714	1 August	31 July	11 June 1727
George II	34	1727	11 June 22 June	10 June 21 Jun	25 October 1760
George III	60,	1760	25 October	24 October	29 January 1820
George IV	11	1820	29 January	28 January	26 June 1830
William IV	7	1830	26 June	25 June	20 June 1837
Victoria	64	1837	20 June	19 June	22 January 1901
Edward VII	10	1901	22 January	21 January	6 May 1910
George V	26	1910	6 May	5 May	20 January 1936
Edward VIII	1	1936	20 January	11 December	11 December 1936
George VI	16	1936	11 December	10 December	5 February 1952
Elizabeth II	71	1952	6 February	5 February	8 September 2022
Charles III	4	2022	8 September	7 September

Legal citation

Latin names and abbreviations

On many legal documents, including the head of statute rolls and statute compilations up until the mid-19th century, the regnal year is usually written out in Latin, e.g. "Anno Regni Georgii II vicesimo nono", meaning the 29th year of the reign of King George II. This is commonly referred to simply as "29 George II" in most English texts.
In dense or compact legal citations, the royal name is often abbreviated, and the royal ordinal is sometimes converted from Roman to Arabic numeral.
In the case of the Tudor queen Elizabeth I, the first monarch of that name, her abbreviated legal citations are rendered without an ordinal number in older sources, so the 25th year of Elizabeth I is simply "25 Eliz."

Regnal name	Modern legal abbr.	17th cent. abbr.	Latin name
Anne	Ann.		Annae
Charles	Car.	Car.	Caroli
Edward	Edw.	E., Ed.	Edwardi
Elizabeth	Eliz.	El., Eliz.	Elizabethae
George	Geo.	G.	Georgii
Henry	Hen.	H.	Henrici
James	Jas.	Jac.	Jacobi
John	Joh.
Mary	Mar.	M.	Mariae
Philip and Mary	Phil. & M.	P. & M.	Philippi & Mariae
Richard	Rich.	R.	Richardi
Victoria	Vict.		Victoriae
William	Will.	W.	Gulielmi
William and Mary	W. & M.		Gulielmi & Mariae

Numbering for regnal year :

Year	Anno
1st	Primo
2nd	Secondo
3rd	Tertio
4th	Quarto
5th	Quinto
6th	Sexto
7th	Septimo
8th	Octavo
9th	Nono
10th	Decimo
11th	Undecimo
12th	Duodecimo
13th	Decimo tertio
14th-19th	Decimo nth, etc.
20th	Vicesimo
21st, etc.	Vicesimo primo, etc.
30th	Tricesimo
31st etc.	Tricesimo primo, etc.
40th	Quadragesimo
41st etc.	Quadragesimo primo, etc.
50th	Quinquagesimo
51st etc.	Quinquagesimo primo, etc.
60th	Sexagesimo

Feast citation

Between 13th and 15th centuries, it was common for English official and legal documents to be dated by reference to the weekday relative to a nearby religious feast date and the regnal year.
Translating a feast citation to a historical calendar date involves looking up the liturgical calendar for the regnal year in question. The standard reference for date conversion is C.R. Cheney's Handbook of Dates.
England had four "quarter days" on which certain transactions, notably the payment of rents, were conducted every year:

It is not uncommon to find English documents or court judgments relating that a certain action goes into effect or has to be undertaken by one of these quarter days.

Term citation

Many old legal documents do not contain any specific day, but simply record the "law term" and regnal year.
Since time immemorial, there was a division between "holy days", dedicated to God alone, where no official or juridical business could be conducted, and "law days" when cases could be judged, writs issued, lawsuits filed, etc.
Traditionally, the English law days were grouped and divided into four "law terms", that is periods when the higher English law courts would be open. Each law term lasted about three weeks, and was named after the major religious feast which immediately preceded it. So the four law terms of England were referred to as "Michaelmas term", "Hilary term", "Easter term" and "Trinity term".
The law terms were primarily established for the Court of Common Pleas, which was separated from the king's court in 1190s and sat in Westminster since 1234. The terms were also adopted by the King's Bench once it also became sedentary. It was more loosely followed by the Exchequer of Pleas. The Court of Chancery, by contrast, was "always open". In practice, the law terms were a little flexible and had varied lengths, depending on the court or volume of business, and sometimes stretched well past the prescribed dates, with breaks if a major religious festival landed within the law term. The Law Terms Act 1830 fixed exact calendar dates for the law terms.
The law terms were abolished in the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873, but the old statutory terms continued to be used as a measure of time for legal awards. By force of tradition, the same term labels are still applied today for sittings of the High Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal, but no longer have the same meaning.

"Hilary term" : the Hilary term originally ran from the feast of St. Hilary to Septuagesima, but the full Hilary law term for Common Pleas ran specifically from the octave of St. Hilary to 12 February. In the Law Terms Act 1830, the Hilary law term was fixed from 11 January to 30 January. Today the Hilary sitting runs from 11 January to the Wednesday before Easter Sunday.
"Easter term" : traditionally ran from octave of Easter to Ascension Day. The Law Terms Act 1830 fixed it to begin on 15 April and end 8 May. Today, the Easter sitting runs from second Tuesday after Easter to Friday before Whitsunday.
"Trinity term" : ran from octave of Whitsunday to mid-July. Early on, it began in the octave of Trinity Sunday, but full term only began from the first Wednesday after Corpus Christi day. The Trinity Term Act 1540 brought that up by a week, and made it officially begin the first Monday after Trinity Sunday and the full term from Friday after Corpus Christi. Today, the Trinity sitting runs from second Tuesday after Whitsunday to 31 July.
"Michaelmas term" : originally the full Michaelmas term ran from the fourth day of the octave of the feast of St. Michael to 28 November. An act of 1641, the Michaelmas Term Act 1640, pushed the begin date forward to 23 October. A 1752 act pushed it further forward, so the Michaelmas law term began on the Morrow of All Souls' Day and the full term on fourth day of Morrow. The Law Terms Act 1830 fixed the term as beginning on 2 November and ending on 25 November. Today, the Michaelmas sitting runs from 1 October to 21 December.

As historically the annual accounts of the Exchequer ended precisely on Michaelmas Day, the Michaelmas law term is traditionally considered the first law term of the year.
These law terms apply only to England.
Some old English universities use the same labels for their academic terms, but their dates should not be confused with law term dates.

Exchequer citation

Regnal years were also used for the records at the Exchequer since the earliest days. However, the royal fiscal accounts were calculated for one year, always starting on the Morrow of Michaelmas Day and ending on Michaelmas Day. The timing of the "exchequer year" did not vary with the reign. Nonetheless, exchequer years were also referenced by royal names and numbers. Citations of Exchequer documents can be tricky as the relationship between the labels used by the Exchequer and the regnal year proper used by the Chancery is unstable.
Exchequer fiscal accounts were reckoned retrospectively. So for the first two centuries, the Pipe Rolls and memoranda of the Exchequer were assigned the label of the regnal year on which the final day fell. This meant that the royal names and numbers assigned to exchequer years overlap and often conflict with the regnal years used by the Chancery, e.g. Henry II's 35th regnal year ended with his death on 6 July 1189, but the exchequer year which began on 30 September 1188 continues until 29 September 1189, which lands in the first regnal year of his successor Richard I. Thus the entire exchequer year is retrospectively labelled and referenced as "1 Richard I". Future receipts from, say, December 1189, are added to "2 Richard I" in exchequer year, but are actually received during "1 Richard I" in regnal year.
The rule changed in 1307. Edward I's 35th regnal year ended with his death on 2 July 1307, and if the old rule had been followed then the exchequer year which began on 30 September 1306 and continued until 29 September 1307 should have been "1 Edward II", the first regnal year of his successor Edward II. But the rule now changed so that the regnal year that formed the majority of the retrospective year ending on Michaelmas Day should be the label for the exchequer year. So the exchequer year of is actually labelled "35 Edward I", while the exchequer year of 1307-08 is "1 Edward II". This new rule brought the exchequer year more closely in alignment with the regnal year.
The rule was changed back again in 1483. After the brief reign of King Edward V, which ended with his deposition on 25 June 1483, the final day of the exchequer year landed in the regnal year of his usurper Richard III. The exchequer year of 1482-83 was labelled "1 Richard III". So it seems the prior rule was reinstated. Yet two years later, the rule reverses again: Richard III died on 22 August 1485, and the final day landed in first regnal year of the Tudor king Henry VII, yet the 1484-85 exchequer year is labelled "3 Richard III".
The rule seems to change again in 1548. The Exchequer year that began on 30 September 1547 and ended on 29 September 1548 is given the label "1 Edward VI". King Edward VI first regnal year started 28 January 1547 and ended 28 January 1548. That means that the first regnal year of Edward VI only overlaps with the first four months of his first exchequer year - clearly not the majority of the 1547-58 exchequer year. So the rule now seems to be for exchequer years to be labeled by the regnal year at the start of the exchequer year, rather than the final day or the majority. This first day rule continues through subsequent years and reigns down to 1831. The difference between exchequer years and regnal years can sometimes be quite dramatic, e.g. Elizabeth I's regnal year only overlaps with the first two months of the corresponding exchequer year bearing the same label. George III's regnal year only overlaps for the first month of the corresponding exchequer year, i.e. George III's first exchequer year begins 30 September 1761, but his first regnal year "1 George III" ends less than a month later, yet the whole exchequer year is referenced as "1 George III" in the pipe roll, despite 11 months of it being in regnal year 2 George III.
The varying rules for labelling exchequer years make it sometimes tricky for historical researchers. Adding to the confusion, issue rolls and receipt rolls used by the Exchequer, which take Michaelmas Day and Easter Day as endpoints, nonetheless employ the chancery's regnal year calendar in labelling rather than the exchequer year.

Parliamentary session citation

Since Medieval times, laws passed by Parliament were inscribed on statute rolls and thereafter on Parliament Rolls. A roll was literally a long continuous scroll of vellum parchment, upon which the acts of a parliamentary session, passed and assented, were written down. A new roll was started at the beginning of a parliamentary session, and labelled by the regnal year in which that session sat. The rolls were stored in various scattered locations around Westminster and London, up until the establishment of the Public Record Office in 1838.
The Parliament of England has passed statutes from 1235 to 1707, of which a small number are still in force in English law jurisdiction. A parliamentary statute is permanent and remains in force until explicitly repealed.
The Parliament of England was converted into the Parliament of Great Britain in 1707 and the Parliament of the United Kingdom in 1801. While politically unified, they were not legally unified. Continued legal separation for Scotland was guaranteed in Article 19 of the 1707 Treaty of Union, and a similar guarantee was made for Ireland in the Act of Union 1800. As a result, the United Kingdom retains three distinct and separate legal systems and three separate legal jurisdictions. Laws passed by the UK parliament in Westminster have to note which of the three legal jurisdictions they apply to. The regnal year method of legal citation covered in this article pertains strictly to English law jurisdiction, and does not necessarily apply to other jurisdictions.
Statute laws are cited not by parliament, but rather by parliamentary session. A parliament usually has multiple sessions. An "adjournment" interrupts a session, a "prorogation" ends a session, and a "dissolution" ends a parliament. A session is labelled by the regnal year in which that session sat up until its prorogation.
In English tradition, a parliamentary session passes only one "statute", albeit various "chapters" for each act. The parliamentary session is labelled by the regnal year in which that session sat. Every public act passed by that session is assigned a chapter number. So the legal citation of a law or public act involves citing the regnal year and chapter, e.g. a public law will be cited as "15 Cha. 2. c. 4", meaning "the fourth chapter of the statute passed by the parliamentary session that sat in the 15th year of the reign of Charles II".
Parliaments can also pass "private acts". These are also given chapter numbers, but kept on a separate list since 1539 and not always printed. Nonetheless, they are cited the same way. This may sometimes cause confusion as a private act can have the same session and chapter number as an entirely different public act. To differentiate, some writers use Roman numerals for private acts and reserve Arabic numerals for public acts. But this is not a universal convention. Indeed, the recent recommended convention is to reserve Arabic numerals for public general acts, Roman numerals for local acts, and italicized Arabic numerals for personal acts.. This is not always easy to differentiate in print or not followed in older sources. When citing a private act, it is advisable to clearly label it "private" to differentiate it from the public act. The default assumption as that the citation "15 Cha. 2. c. 4" refers to a public act, unless otherwise noted.
If a single parliamentary session overlaps the regnal year start date, it is given a double-label, e.g. Charles II's regnal year begins 30 January, so the parliamentary session that ran from October 1670 to April 1671 is labelled "22 & 23 Cha. 2".
If there are two sessions within the same regnal year, they are differentiated by a "statute" or "session" suffix. Finally, some sessions were prorogued without passing an act, and thus have no legal statute label at all.
In the event of two sessions within the same regnal year, the chapter numbering would reset and the sessions are differentiated by the suffixes: "statute 1" & "statute 2" or alternatively "session 1" and "session 2". It is sometimes alleged that "sess. 2" is used if it is a new session of a continuing parliament and "stat. 2" if it is the first session of a new parliament, but that does not seem to be consistently true. Whether "sess." or "stat." is applied depends on the compilation used.
For example, Mary I, whose regnal start date is on 6 July 1553, had three parliamentary sessions within her first regnal year - two sessions within her first parliament, and a third session in her second parliament. The Treason Act 1553 is cited "1 Mar. Sess. 1. c. 1" is it was passed in the first session of her first parliament, while Legitimacy of the Queen, etc. Act 1553 is cited "1 Mar. sess. 2. c. 1" as it was passed in the second session of her first parliament and finally Queen Regent's Prerogative Act 1554 is cited as "1 Mar. sess. 3. c. 1" as it was passed in the first session of her second parliament. All three are within her first regnal year.
The Riot Act is cited as "1 Geo. St. 2. c. 5", was passed in the first session of the second parliament of the first year of the reign of George I.
The Long Parliament presents an anomaly, since it was convened by the King Charles I of England on 3 November 1640 and went through various incarnations until it was finally dissolved on 16 March 1660. Since its first session of 1640 was never prorogued by royal command, its first session officially never ended, and all its surviving acts are labelled "16 Cha. 1".

Retrospective dates

Historically, the act of giving royal assent to a statute — and all the acts on it – only happened on the last day of the parliamentary session. This was because the action of giving royal assent also ended the session. This practice was ended in July 1625, when bubonic plaque caused Parliament to withdraw to Oxford. The Parliament Act 1625 made the necessary change in law.
Even after this change, the date of assent for a specific act was not noted in the statute text. Historians trying to affix a conventional calendar date to a specific act have to search in the Journals of the House of Commons. This was changed by the Acts of Parliament (Commencement) Act 1793 which required the Clerk of Parliament to explicitly record the date of passage and assent. So it is only from 1794 onwards that statutes explicitly include the calendar date of an act.
It was also the case that an act was assumed to go into legal effect not on the final day of the session, but rather on the first day of the session in which it was passed. That means that acts of Parliament applied retrospectively to the start of the session, several weeks or months before they were actually passed and assented. To avoid injustices, it was common for legislation to explicitly specify in the text the date when a new law, regulation, or tax would begin to apply. If a commencement date was not specified, magistrates could prosecute or impose penalties on actions that were perfectly legal at the time. This often provoked indignation and outrage. William Blackstone, in his influential 1765 Commentaries, railed against retrospective laws, insisting laws should apply only to the future. Remembering the English experience, Americans were careful to include a categorical prohibition on ex post facto laws in the US Constitution in 1789. The Acts of Parliament Act 1793 finally remedied this, and thereafter laws only applied from the date of assent recorded by the clerk in the statute. This was reinforced in the Interpretation Act 1978.
The pre-1794 custom of retrospective dating may cause confusion in the "short titles" for statutes which happen to have a year in the title. Parliamentary sessions often started in Autumn and continued into Spring. So an act that was passed in, say, the Spring of 1554 might nonetheless be given the year "1553" in its short title - as that is when the session began, and thus when the act came into retrospective force. Thus historians often have to tangle with the awkwardness of citing an "act of 1553" responding to events occurring in 1554. Careful writers will take care to mention the actual year of passage in the historical narrative if there is risk of confusion with the year in the short title. Careless writers might not make notice of it and let readers assume the short title year is the actual year of passage, e.g. the Bubble Act passed in June 1720 is sometimes mistakenly cited in history books as being passed in 1719 simply because its legal short title is the "Royal Exchange and London Assurance Corporation Act 1719".

Statute compilations

Citation labels are not always consistent, and depends on the statute compilation used.
For historical researchers, the most prominent compilations of statutes are the popular Statutes at Large and the similarly-named contemporary rival Statutes at Large The labels and numbering in Ruffhead and Pickering compilations are identical, and so interchangeable. But their regnal year titles sometimes differ considerably from the official The Statutes of the Realm. So when citing old statutes before 1714 it is sometimes necessary to check for variances and make note of which compilation is being used.
The fourth major historical compilation entering the fray was the Statutes at Large of England and Great Britain, which is continued as the Statutes of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
All these statute compilations are unofficial, put out by private editors and printers. While well-regarded and treated as authoritative by the legal profession, there was no guarantee they were complete, or that their wording was correct and the law was as stated.
In 1796, a parliamentary select committee, under the chairmanship of Charles Abbott, reviewed the private statute compilations, and their report concluded that they were inadequate – some statutes were missing entirely, others had missing clauses, some had been repealed, etc. They recommended the establishment of a Record Commission to oversee the publication of an "authentic and entire record" from the English statute rolls. The official The Statutes of the Realm was the result of this effort. However it only went as far as 1714. Legal professionals still had to rely on the Statutes at Large compilations put out by private publishers until the 1860s.
A Statute Law Commission was established in 1854 under lord chancellor Robert Rolfe, 1st Baron Cranworth to overhaul the compilation of statutes. During this process, they also composed parliamentary bills to formally repeal and clear statutes that are no longer in force, and consolidate some scattered acts into a new comprehensive bills. A Statute Law Committee was appointed in 1868 under the Lord Chancellor Hugh Cairns, 1st Earl Cairns, who took over the publication of the compilation. The committee published a series of volumes known as The Statutes Revised from 1870 to 1885, compiling existing statute law down to 1878, and regarded as official. After a series of additional acts consolidating statutes, a second revised edition was put out in 1888, removing the ones that were repealed. The Statutes Second Revised edition compiles statutes from 1235 down to 1920. The official Statutes Revised collections follow the Statutes of the Realm labels until 1714, and the Statutes at Large labels thereafter.