Polish phonology


The phonological system of the Polish language is similar in many ways to those of other Slavic languages, although there are some characteristic features found in only a few other languages of the family, such as contrasting postalveolar and alveolo-palatal fricatives and affricates. The vowel system is relatively simple, with just six oral monophthongs and two nasals in traditional speech, while the consonant system is much more complex.

Vowels

The Polish vowel system consists of six oral sounds. Traditionally, it was also said to include two nasal monophthongs, with Polish considered the last Slavic language that had preserved nasal sounds that existed in Proto-Slavic. However, recent sources present for modern Polish a vowel system without nasal vowel phonemes, including only the aforementioned six oral vowels.

Oral

Close

  • is close front unrounded. It is somewhat more open than cardinal.
  • ranges from almost close-mid near-front to close-mid central or alternatively from near-close near-front unrounded to close-mid central unrounded. These descriptions are essentially equivalent. Traditionally, is used in narrow transcriptions. Older sources describe this vowel as follows:
  • * According to, it is intermediate between cardinal and, but closer to the latter one. Alternatively, it is intermediate between cardinal and, but closer to the former. He places it on a vowel chart closer to.
  • * According to it is articulated with the centre of the tongue raised up and moved somewhat forward; the pharynx also widens. She places it on a vowel chart closer to.
  • * According to, it is near-close central unrounded, with a close-mid central unrounded allophone being optional before and in some unstressed positions. A realization close to near-close near front unrounded is present in northeastern dialects.
  • is close back rounded. It is somewhat more open than cardinal, and intermediate between them in terms of labialization.
  • * There is no complete agreement about the realization of between soft consonants:
  • ** According to, it is close back somewhat fronted.
  • ** According to, it is close central.
  • ** According to, it is close centralized.

    Mid

  • is open-mid front unrounded. It is somewhat more open than cardinal.
  • * There is no complete agreement about the realization of between soft consonants:
  • ** According to, and, it is close-mid front unrounded.
  • ** According to, it is either mid front unrounded or mid retracted front unrounded.
  • ** According to the British phonetician John C. Wells, it is often noticeably centralized : somewhat closer to a central vowel in palatal contexts.
  • is open-mid back. It is somewhat more open than cardinal, and intermediate between them in terms of labialization.
  • * There is no complete agreement about the rounding of :
  • ** According to, it is usually somewhat rounded, but sometimes, it is pronounced with neutral lips. In the latter case, the lack of rounding is compensated for by a stronger retraction of the tongue.
  • ** According to, citing, it is unrounded.
  • ** According to, it is simply "rounded".
  • * There is no complete agreement about the realization of between soft consonants:
  • ** According to, it can be any of the following: open-mid centralized back rounded, raised open-mid back rounded or mid advanced back rounded
  • ** According to, it is close-mid advanced back rounded.
  • ** According to, it is close-mid central rounded vowel.
  • * According to, a close-mid back is a free variant before.

    Open

  • is open central unrounded. According to most sources, it is intermediate between cardinal and. However, describes it broadly as open front unrounded. Traditionally, is used even in otherwise narrow transcriptions.
  • * There is no complete agreement about the realization of between soft consonants:
  • ** According to, it is open front unrounded.
  • ** According to, it is open front unrounded or even near-open front unrounded. She uses for the main central allophone.
  • ** According to, it is near-open central unrounded.
  • ** According to, it is near-open near-front unrounded.

    Distribution

The vowels and have largely complementary distribution. Either vowel may follow a labial consonant, as in mi and my. Elsewhere, however, is usually restricted to word-initial position and positions after alveolo-palatal consonants and approximants, while cannot appear in those positions. Either vowel may follow a velar fricative but after velar the vowel is limited to rare loanwords e.g. kynologia and gyros . Dental, postalveolar consonants and approximants are followed by in native or assimilated words. However, appears outside its usual positions in some foreign-derived words, as in chipsy and tir . The degree of palatalization in these contexts is weak. In some phonological descriptions of Polish that make a phonemic distinction between palatalized and unpalatalized consonants, and may thus be treated as allophones of a single phoneme. In the past, was closer to, which is acoustically more similar to.

Nasal

Nasal vowels do not feature uniform nasality over their duration. Phonetically, they consist of an oral vowel followed by a nasal semivowel or . Therefore, they are phonetically diphthongs.

Phonological status

The nasal phonemes appear in older phonological descriptions of Polish e.g.,,. In more recent descriptions the orthographic nasal vowels ą, ę are analyzed as two phonemes in all contexts e.g.,. Before a fricative and in word-final position they are transcribed as an oral vowel followed by a nasal consonant or. Under such an analysis, the list of consonantal phonemes is extended by a velar nasal phoneme or by two nasal approximants,.

Distribution

If analyzed as separate phonemes, nasal vowels do not occur except before a fricative and in word-final position. When the letters ą and ę appear before stops and affricates, they indicate an oral or followed by a nasal consonant homorganic with the following consonant. For example, kąt is, gęba is, pięć is and bąk is, as if they were spelled *kont, *gemba, *pieńć and *bonk. Before or, nasality is lost altogether, and ą and ę are pronounced as oral or. The sequence is also denasalized to in word-final position, as in 'I will be'.
IPAPolish scriptExample
i
e
y
a
u/
o'
ę
ą
ę
ą

Historical development

Distinctive vowel length was inherited from late Proto-Slavic, although in Polish only some pretonic long vowels and vowels with the neoacute retained length. Additional vowel lengths were introduced in Proto-Polish as a result of compensatory lengthening when a yer in the next syllable disappeared according to Havlík's law. In Polish this only happened in penultimate syllables before a voiced consonant.
The resultant system of vowel lengths was similar to what is today preserved in Czech and to a lesser degree in Slovak, although the distribution of the sounds often differed. In the emerging modern Polish, however, the long vowels were shortened again but sometimes with a change in quality. The latter changes came to be incorporated into the standard language only in the case of long o and the long nasal vowel. The vowel shift may thus be presented as follows:
  • long oral > short oral
  • long oral > short oral
  • long oral or > short oral or
  • long oral > short oral , written ó
  • long oral > short oral, written u
  • long nasal > short nasal, written ą
The that was once a long is still distinguished in script as ó, except in some words which were later respelled, such as bruzda, dłuto, pruć.
In most circumstances, consonants were palatalized when followed by an original front vowel, including the soft yer that was often later lost. For example: *dьnь became dzień, while *dьnьmъ became dniem.
Nasal vowels and of late Proto-Slavic merged to become the medieval Polish vowel, written ø. Like other Polish vowels, it developed long and short variants. The short variant developed into present-day ę, while the long form became, written ą, as described above. Overall:
  • Proto-Slavic > when short, when long
  • Proto-Slavic > ę when short, ą when long
The historical shifts are the reason for the alternations o:''ó and ę'':ą commonly encountered in Polish morphology: *rogъ became róg due to the loss of the following yer, and the instrumental case of the same word went from *rogъmъ to rogiem. Similarly, *dǫbъ became dąb, and in the instrumental case, *dǫbъmъ the vowel remained short, causing the modern dębem.

Dialectal variation

differ particularly in their realization of nasal vowels, both in terms of whether and when they are decomposed to an oral vowel followed by a nasal consonant and in terms of the quality of the vowels used.
Also, some dialects preserve nonstandard developments of historical long vowels ; for example, a may be pronounced with in words in which it was historically long.

Consonants

The Polish consonant system is more complicated; its characteristic features include the series of affricates and palatal consonants that resulted from four Proto-Slavic palatalisations and two further palatalisations that took place in Polish and Belarusian.