Early Modern English
Early Modern English, also known as Early New English, and colloquially Shakespeare's English, Shakespearean English, or King James' English, is the stage of the English language from the beginning of the Tudor period to the English Interregnum and Restoration, or from the transition from Middle English, in the late 15th century, to the transition to Modern English, in the mid-to-late 17th century.
Before and after the accession of James I to the English throne in 1603, the emerging English standard began to influence the spoken and written Middle Scots of Scotland.
The grammatical and orthographical conventions of literary English in the late 16th century and the 17th century are still very influential on modern Standard English. Most modern readers of English can understand texts written in the late phase of Early Modern English, such as the King James Bible and the works of William Shakespeare, and they have greatly influenced Modern English.
Texts from the earlier phase of Early Modern English, such as the late-15th-century Le Morte d'Arthur and the mid-16th-century Gorboduc, may present more difficulties but are still closer to Modern English grammar, lexicon and phonology than are 14th-century Middle English texts, such as the works of Geoffrey Chaucer.
History
English Renaissance
Transition from Middle English
The change from Middle English to Early Modern English affected much more than just vocabulary and pronunciation.Middle English underwent significant change over time and contained large dialectical variations. Early Modern English, on the other hand, became more standardised and developed an established canon of literature that survives today.
- 1476 – William Caxton started printing in Westminster; however, the language that he used reflected the variety of styles and dialects used by the authors who originally wrote the material.
Tudor period (1485–1603)
- 1485 – Caxton published Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur, the first print bestseller in English. Malory's language, while archaic in some respects, was clearly Early Modern and was possibly a Yorkshire or Midlands dialect.
- 1491 or 1492 – Richard Pynson started printing in London; his style tended to prefer Chancery Standard, the form of English used by the government.
Henry VIII
- 1509 – Pynson became the king's official printer.
- From 1525 – Publication of William Tyndale's Bible translation, which was initially banned.
- 1539 – Publication of the Great Bible, the first officially authorised Bible in English. Edited by Myles Coverdale, it was largely from the work of Tyndale. It was read to congregations regularly in churches, which familiarised much of the population of England with a standard form of the language.
- 1549 – Publication of the first edition of the Book of Common Prayer in English, under the supervision of Thomas Cranmer, which standardised much of the wording of church services. Some have argued that since attendance at prayer book services was required by law for many years, the repetitive use of its language helped to standardise Modern English even more than the King James Bible did.
- 1557 – Publication of Tottel's Miscellany.
Elizabethan English
;Elizabethan era- 1560 – The Geneva Bible was published. The New Testament was completed in 1557 by English Reformed exiles on the continent during the reign of Mary, and the complete Bible three years later, after Elizabeth succeeded the throne. This version was favoured by the Puritans and Pilgrims due to its more vigorous and forceful language. Its popularity and proliferation over the following decades sparked the production of the King James Bible to counter it.
- 1582 – The Rheims and Douai Bible was completed, and the New Testament was released in Rheims, France, in 1582. It was the first complete English translation of the Bible that was officially sponsored and carried out by the Catholic Church. Though the Old Testament was already complete, it was not published until 1609–1610, when it was released in two volumes. While it did not make a large impact on the English language at large, it certainly played a role in the development of English, especially in heavily Catholic English-speaking areas.
- Christopher Marlowe,
- 1592 – The Spanish Tragedy by Thomas Kyd
- – Shakespeare's plays written
17th century
Jacobean and Caroline eras
Jacobean era (1603–1625)
- 1609 – Shakespeare's sonnets published
- Other playwrights:
- *Ben Jonson
- *Thomas Dekker
- *Beaumont and Fletcher
- *John Webster
- 1607 – The first successful permanent English colony in the New World, Jamestown, is established in Virginia. Early vocabulary specific to American English comes from indigenous languages.
- 1611 – The King James Version was published, largely based on Tyndale's translation. It remained the standard Bible in the Church of England into the latter half of the twentieth century.
- 1623 – Shakespeare's First Folio published
Caroline era and English Civil War (1625–1649)
- 1630–1651 – William Bradford, Governor of Plymouth Colony, wrote his journal. It will become Of Plymouth Plantation, one of the earliest texts written in the American Colonies.
- 1647 – Publication of the first Beaumont and Fletcher folio
Interregnum and Restoration
The English Civil War and the Interregnum were times of social and political upheaval and instability.The dates for Restoration literature are a matter of convention and differ markedly from genre to genre. In drama, the "Restoration" may last until 1700, but in poetry, it may last only until 1666, the annus mirabilis, and in prose lasts until 1688. With the increasing tensions over succession and the corresponding rise in journalism and periodicals, or until possibly 1700, when those periodicals grew more stabilised.
- 1651 – Publication of Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes.
- 1660–1669 – Samuel Pepys wrote his diary, which will become an important eyewitness account of the Restoration Era.
- 1662 – New edition of the Book of Common Prayer, largely based on the 1549 and subsequent editions. It long remained a standard work in English.
- 1667 – Publication of Paradise Lost by John Milton and of Annus Mirabilis by John Dryden.
Development to Modern English
The 17th-century port towns and their forms of speech gained influence over the old county towns. From around the 1690s onwards, England experienced a new period of internal peace and relative stability, which encouraged the arts including literature. Modern English can be taken to have emerged fully by the beginning of the Georgian era in 1714, but English orthography remained somewhat fluid until the publication of Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language, in 1755.The Proceedings in Courts of Justice Act 1730 made English, instead of Law French and Latin, the obligatory language for use in the courts of England and in the court of exchequer in Scotland. It was later extended to Wales, and seven years later a similar act was passed in Ireland, the Administration of Justice (Language) Act (Ireland) 1737.
The towering importance of William Shakespeare over the other Elizabethan authors was the result of his reception during the 17th and the 18th centuries, which directly contributes to the development of Standard English. Shakespeare's plays are therefore still familiar and comprehensible 400 years after they were written, but the works of Geoffrey Chaucer and William Langland, which had been written only 200 years earlier, are considerably more difficult for the average modern reader.
Orthography
The orthography of Early Modern English is recognisably similar to that of today, but spelling was unstable. Early Modern and Modern English both retain various orthographical conventions that predate the Great Vowel Shift.Early Modern English spelling was broadly similar to that encountered in Middle English. Some of the changes that occurred were based on etymology. Many spellings had still not been standardised. For example, he was spelled as both en-emodeng and en-emodeng in the same sentence in Shakespeare's plays and elsewhere.
Certain key orthographic features of Early Modern English spelling have not been retained:
- The letter had two distinct lowercase forms:, as is still used today, and . The short s was always used at the end of a word and often elsewhere. The long s, if used, could appear anywhere except at the end of a word. The double lowercase S was written variously, or . That is similar to the alternation between medial and final lowercase sigma in Greek.
- [U|] and [V|] were not considered two distinct letters then but as still different forms of the same letter. Typographically, was frequent at the start of a word and elsewhere: hence vnmoued and en-emodeng. The modern convention of using for the vowel sounds and for the consonant appears to have been introduced in the 1630s. Also, was frequently represented by.
- Similarly, [I|] and [J|] were also still considered not as two distinct letters, but as different forms of the same letter: hence ioy for joy and en-emodeng for just. Again, the custom of using as a vowel and as a consonant began in the 1630s.
- The letter was still in use during the Early Modern English period but was increasingly limited to handwritten texts. In Early Modern English printing, was represented by the Latin, which appeared similar to thorn in blackletter typeface . Thorn had become nearly totally disused by the late Early Modern English period, the last vestiges of the letter being its ligatures, en-emodeng, en-emodeng, en-emodeng, which were still seen occasionally in the 1611 King James Version and in Shakespeare's Folios.
- A silent was often appended to words, as in ſpeake and cowarde. The last consonant was sometimes doubled when the was added: hence manne and runne.
- The sound that became Modern English was often written : hence ſommer, plombe.
- The final syllable of words like public was variously spelt but came to be standardised as -ick. The modern spellings with -ic did not come into use until the mid-18th century.
- was often used instead of.
- The vowels represented by and changed, and became an alternative.
Phonology
The phonology of Early Modern English is reconstructed from a variety of sources, including phonetic descriptions by orthoepists, spellings, and usage in poetry.Consonants
Most consonant sounds of Early Modern English have survived into present-day English; however, there are still a few notable differences in pronunciation:- Many initial consonant clusters which have disappeared in the modern day were still fully pronounced. These include. All but have fully reduced in the 16th and 17th centuries.
- * as in write was the first to disappear, merging into in the first half of the 17th century.
- * as in knife evolved into a variety of pronunciations including, some of which remained into the 18th century until it merged with.
- * Similarly, as in gnat evolved into or merged into or.
- *, spelled such as in what, where and whale, were still pronounced, rather than. That means, for example, that wine and whine were still pronounced differently, unlike in most varieties of English today. A merger into had started by 1700, but did not become common until the late 18th century.
- Much variation existed in words with postvocalic, like night, thought, and daughter, written. In Middle English, this phoneme had allophones. While dropped entirely via, either dropped via the same path or became. The most conservative dialects retained the original allophones until the 1630s, but gh-dropping dialects had already started appearing in Middle English.Would and should had started losing in weak forms by the 1640s, but may have persisted several decades longer in the British American colonies. While the in could is unetymological, having descended from Old English cūþe, both its spelling and its pronunciation were affected by analogy with would and should, showing in its strong forms.
- The modern phoneme was not documented as occurring until the mid-17th century, when it formed from coalescence of the sequence. The word vision was pronounced prior to the change.
- Early Modern English was rhotic, as postvocalic was not lost until the late 1700s. It was a trill or tap word-initially and an approximant finally, but Dobson and Lass disagree on which was the intervocalic allophone based on different sources.
- In Early Modern English, the precise nature of the light and dark variants of the l consonant, respectively and, remains unclear.
- Word-final, as in sing, was still pronounced until the late 16th century, when it began to coalesce into the usual modern pronunciation,. Coalescence happened at morpheme boundaries in the 17th century, except in inflected adjectives, giving us modern "sier" and "stroer". However, coalescence happened earlier in unstressed -ing and the nasal further changed to, becoming more and more common until the end of the 17th century. The original pronunciation is preserved in parts of England, in dialects such as Brummie, Mancunian and Scouse.
- H-dropping at the start of words was common. In loanwords taken from Latin, Greek, or any Romance language, a written h was increasingly pronounced from the 17th to 18th centuries, e.g. in humble, host, and British herb.
Vowels
The following information primarily comes from studies of the Great Vowel Shift; see the related chart.- The modern English phoneme, as in glide, rhyme and eye, was, and was reduced word-finally. Early Modern rhymes indicate that was similar to the vowel that was used at the end of words like happy, melody and busy.
- , as in now, out and ploughed, was.
- , as in fed, elm and hen, was more or less the same as the phoneme represents today, sometimes approaching .
- , as in name, case and sake, was a long monophthong. It shifted from to and finally to. Earlier in Early Modern English, mat and mate were near-homophones, with a longer vowel in the second word. Thus, Shakespeare rhymed words like haste, taste and waste with last and shade with sad. The more open pronunciation remains in some Northern England English and rarely in Irish English. During the 17th century, the phoneme variably merged with the phoneme as in day, weigh, and the merger survived into standard forms of Modern English, though a few dialects kept these vowels distinct at least to the 20th century.
- as in see, bee and meet, was more or less the same as the phoneme represents today, but it had not yet merged with the phoneme represented by the spellings or .
- , as in bib, pin and thick, was more or less the same as the phoneme represents today.
- , as in stone, bode and yolk, was or. The phoneme was probably just beginning the process of merging with the phoneme, as in grow, know and mow, without yet achieving today's complete merger. The old pronunciation remains in some dialects, such as in Yorkshire, East Anglia, and Scotland.
- , as in rod, top and pot, was or, much like the corresponding RP sound.
- , as in taut, taught and law was more open than in contemporary RP, being or
- , as in boy, choice and toy, is even less clear than other vowels. In the late 16th century, the similar but distinct phonemes, and all existed. By the late 17th century, they all merged. Because those phonemes were in such a state of flux during the whole Early Modern period, scholars often assume only the most neutral possibility for the pronunciation of as well as its similar phonemes in Early Modern English: .
- and had not yet split and so were both pronounced in the vicinity of.
- occurred not only in words like food, moon and stool, but also all other words spelled with like blood, cook and foot. However, the vowel for some of those words was shortened at an early stage: either beginning or already in the process of approximating the Early Modern English. That phonological split among the words was a catalyst for the later foot–strut split and is called "early shortening" by John C. Wells. The words that came to be pronounced with the shortened vowel included, for example, good and blood. They, like other words with /ʊ/, were subsequently subject to the foot–strut split and many of them, like drum and love, came to be pronounced with the vowel and eventually. However, the words with a shortened vowel also seem to have included, at least in some pronunciations such as Shakespeare's and at certain stages, some words that are pronounced with the original non-shortened vowel in Present-Day English - e.g. brood, doom and noon. For example, doom and come rhyme in Shakespeare's writing for this reason.
- or occurred in words spelled with ew or ue such as due and dew. In most dialects of Modern English, it became and by yod-dropping and so do, dew and due are now perfect homophones in most American pronunciations, but a distinction between the two phonemes remains in other versions of English. There is, however, an additional complication in dialects with yod-coalescence, in which dew and due are distinguished from do purely by the initial consonant, without any vowel distinction.
Rhoticity
The r sound was probably always pronounced following vowel sounds, as in modern General American, West Country English, Irish English, and Scottish English.At the beginning of the Early Modern English period there were three non-open and non-schwa short vowels before in the syllable coda:, and . In London English they gradually merged into a phoneme that became modern, known as the mergers. While spellings for words exist in the 1500s, these are descended from Old English words with the segments and suggesting that they may not be part of the merger. The earliest native speaker to comment on mergers between the classes is John Wallis in 1653, showing a near merger of and, with "turn" and "burn" having the vowel of "dull", and "virtue" with a slightly closer or unrounded vowel. However, a smaller number of speakers merge and instead. The full three-way mergers only completed in England around 1800.
Specific words
Nature was pronounced approximately as and may have rhymed with letter or, early on, even latter. One may have been pronounced own, with both one and other using the era's long vowel, rather than today's vowels. Tongue derived from the sound of tong and rhymed with song.Grammar
Pronouns
Early Modern English had two second-person personal pronouns: thou, the informal singular pronoun, and ye, the plural pronoun and the formal singular pronoun."Thou" and "ye" were both common in the early 16th century but by 1650, "thou" seems old-fashioned or literary. It has effectively completely disappeared from Modern Standard English.
The translators of the King James Version of the Bible had a particular reason for keeping the informal "thou/thee/thy/thine/thyself" forms that were slowly beginning to fall out of spoken use, as it enabled them to match the Hebrew and Ancient Greek distinction between second person singular and plural. It was not to denote reverence but only to denote the singular. Over the centuries, however, the very fact that "thou" was dropping out of normal use gave it a special aura and so it gradually and ironically came to be used to express reverence in hymns and in prayers.
Like other personal pronouns, thou and ye have different forms dependent on their grammatical case; specifically, the objective form of thou is thee, its possessive forms are thy and thine, and its reflexive or emphatic form is thyself. The objective form of ye was you, its possessive forms are your and yours and its reflexive or emphatic forms are yourself and yourselves. The older forms "mine" and "thine" had become "my" and "thy" before words beginning with a consonant other than h, and "mine" and "thine" were retained before words beginning with a vowel or an h, as in mine eyes or thine hand.
Verbs
Tense and number
During the Early Modern period, the verb inflections became simplified as they evolved towards their modern forms:- The third-person singular present lost its alternate inflections: -eth and -th became obsolete, and -s survived.
- The plural present form became uninflected. Present plurals had been marked with -en and singulars with -th or -s. Marked present plurals were rare throughout the Early Modern period and -en was probably used only as a stylistic affectation to indicate rural or old-fashioned speech.
- The second-person singular indicative was marked in both the present and past tenses with -st or -est. Since the indicative past was not and still is not otherwise marked for person or number, the loss of thou made the past subjunctive indistinguishable from the indicative past for all verbs except to be.
Modal auxiliaries
The modal auxiliaries cemented their distinctive syntactical characteristics during the Early Modern period. Thus, the use of modals without an infinitive became rare. The use of modals' present participles to indicate aspect, and of their preterite forms to indicate tense also became uncommon.Some verbs ceased to function as modals during the Early Modern period. The present form of must, mot, became obsolete. Dare also lost the syntactical characteristics of a modal auxiliary and evolved a new past form, distinct from the modal durst.
Perfect and progressive forms
The perfect of the verbs had not yet been standardised to use only the auxiliary verb "to have". Some took as their auxiliary verb "to be", such as this example from the King James Version: "But which of you... will say unto him... when he is come from the field, Go and sit down..." . The rules for the auxiliaries for different verbs were similar to those that are still observed in German and French.The modern syntax used for the progressive aspect became dominant by the end of the Early Modern period, but other forms were also common such as the prefix a- and the infinitive paired with "do". Moreover, the to be + -ing verb form could be used to express a passive meaning without any additional markers: "The house is building" could mean "The house is being built".