Melaspileella
Melaspileella is an ascomycete genus in the family Melaspileellaceae, placed in the order Asterinales. The family was established in 2018 to accommodate the single genus Melaspileella, which contains only M. proximella, a species originally described in 1861. Long misclassified as a lichen and moved through various genera, molecular studies confirmed it is actually a non-lichenised saprophyte living on tree bark. The fungus is characterised by minute black fruiting bodies and distinctive ascospores bearing slender appendages that are visible when wet but disappear upon drying. Found across temperate and boreal regions of the Northern Hemisphere on both conifers and broad-leaved trees, it remains rarely encountered, likely due to its tiny size and inconspicuous appearance.
Taxonomy
Melaspileellaceae was established in 2018 by Dong-Qin Dai, Kevin D. Hyde and co-authors, who used DNA sequence data to show that Melaspileella forms a distinct clade within Asterinales, sister to Hemigraphaceae, and therefore merits recognition as a separate family. Recent classification summaries treat Melaspileellaceae as containing a single genus, Melaspileella, and regard that genus as monospecific with only Melaspileella proximella accepted.The generic name was originally introduced by Petter Karsten as a subgenus, Melaspileella, to accommodate three species: Celidium nephromiarium, C. neglectulum and C. proximellum. Edvard Vainio later raised Melaspileella to generic rank in 1921, applying it to two species that had previously been included in Melaspilea in the loose sense and treating M. proximella as the type species of the genus. Around the same period, other authors created combinations such as Melaspileella nephromiaria for species originally described in Arthonia and related genera, which contributed to a heterogeneous and taxonomically unstable concept of Melaspileella.
The fungus now known as Melaspileella proximella was first described by William Nylander in 1861 as Arthonia proximella, reflecting an early assumption that it was a lichenised member of Arthoniaceae. It was subsequently moved through several genera and families, at various times placed in Catillaria, Melaspilea, and Buellia, or segregated in the genus Banhegyia, which illustrates the long-standing uncertainty about its true relationships. A molecular study by Damien Ertz and Paul Diederich, published in 2015, showed that Melaspilea and related "melaspileoid" fungi belong to several unrelated lineages within Dothideomycetes and demonstrated that Melaspileella proximella is not part of Arthoniomycetes but rather belongs in Asterinales. In that work they lectotypified the genus with M. proximella, transferred Banhegyia setispora to Melaspileella as a synonym of M. proximella on morphological grounds, and moved the genus to Asterinales without assigning it to a family.
Subsequent phylogenetic analyses by Dai and co-authors confirmed that sequences of M. proximella form an independent lineage in Asterinales, leading to the formal introduction of Melaspileellaceae to accommodate this single genus. At the same time, modern treatments have not retained the other historical combinations in Melaspileella: Vainio's species M. microspilota and M. pandani are treated as former Melaspilea sensu lato species that have not been included in the current, sequence-based circumscription of the genus, while Melaspileella nephromiaria is now regarded in Species Fungorum as an alternative name for Arthonia patellulata var. nephromiaria and placed in Arthoniaceae rather than in Melaspileellaceae. As a result, recent phylogenetic and classification works consider Melaspileella to be a monotypic genus containing only M. proximella.