Mahfiruz Hatun


Hatice Mahfiruz Hatun or Mahfiruze Hatun was a concubine of Ottoman sultan Ahmed I and mother of his firstborn son, Osman II.

Biography

Origins

Her first given name can be written either as Mahfiruz, Mâhfirûz, Mâhirûze, Mâhfirûze, Mâh-Firûze, Mâh-i Feyrûz. She had a second given name too, Hatice. Her name was first recorded by historian Mustafa Naima who wrote his history of the Ottoman Empire after her life, and maybe referring to her origins, he quoted Mâhfirûz as a "noble and august" lady.
While in the past it was thought she could be Greek, this hypothesis has been debunked when it was proven that it was based on an 18th century novel.

Early life in the harem

Mahfiruz became Ahmed I's first and principal concubine - before being elevated to the title of Haseki Sultan - and on 3 November 1604 she gave birth to his firstborn son, the future Osman II, making Ahmed I the youngest Ottoman sultan to have fathered a child. According to Ahmet Refik Altınay, in the following years, she bore the Sultan other children, including Şehzade Bayezid in 1612, Şehzade Hüseyn in 1613, Şehzade Süleyman in 1615, an information reproduced by several authors; foreign ambassadors report a daughter who reached adulthood and got married, identified as Gevherhan Sultan and born between 1605 and 1608. These children may contradict the theory of a premature death.

As Haseki Sultan

According to some historians, she held the title of Haseki Sultan from 1604, an information confirmed also by the French historian and politician Alphonse de Lamartine. The fact that Mahfiruz was the first one to be entitled as Haseki is also underlined and explained by Tektaş, who writes that Kösem wouldn't have allowed another woman to hold the title after herself.
Conflicting records show that she died shortly before her son's reign, while others state that she lived on well into the reign of Murad IV.
In 1617, Sultan Ahmed I passed away: subsequently, Mahfiruz and other consorts or concubines of the late Sultan were sent - as per tradition - to Eski Saray. The fact that Osman wasn't proclaimed Sultan can be seen as the consequence of the fact that his accession to the throne could have led to the killing of his half-brothers, thus the sons of Kösem, as according to the law. The woman, who feared that Mahfiruze could have convinced her son to kill his half-siblings, may have acted so to avoid Osman's succession and the execution of her sons by putting Şehzade Mustafa, the only surviving mental ill half-brother of Ahmed I, on the throne.
Şehzade Mustafa was, as a result of this, proclaimed Sultan after Ahmed I's death in 1617, thus skipping Mahfiruz's son Osman. His mother, Halime Sultan, acted as de facto ruler during the two reigns of her son who - because of his mental state - wasn't able to reign on his own. Hovewer, he was deposed shortly after, in the early months of 1618.

As Valide Sultan (?)

As Osman ascended the throne in February 1618, she was taken from the Old Palace to Topkapı Palace again.
Regarding Osman's accession, she attended and partecipated in the February 1618 crowning procession. This can be seen, as the Austrian Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, Hans Mollard von Reinek - invited to attend the ceremony with his entourage composed also of a painter - wanted the moment to be depicted in a portrait; this painting, titled "The rise of the young Osman" was later auctioned at Sotheby's and sold to the Turkish Ministry of Culture in 2016 and since then exposed at Topkapı Palace.
During her alleged tenure as Valide Sultan, she and Kösem Sultan were not on bad terms, according to historian Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall, and this can be seen as Sultan Osman visited the Old Palace in April 1619 where he stayed for some days, on the occasion of celebrations held for him by Kösem; Kösem wanted probably to have a good relationship with Mahfiruze at the time. Mahfiruz is largely remembered in Eyüp because of her charity work which is reported by the city itself during anniversaries or events: she had a cüzhane built in Eyüp Cemetery between 1618 and 1622, completed in the same year as recorded from one of Eyüp cemetery's guides.
Her other contributions to the city of Eyüp are widely reported: she provided Quran copies to her cüzhane, and also rendered religious services at the tomb of Sultan Ahmed I. A devotee of Abu Ayyub al-Ansari, because of her charitable works she got nicknamed as "Sâhibe-i Hayrât".

For Peirce

According to historian Leslie P. Peirce, Mahfiruz did not became Valide Sultan and instead died in exile in 1620, as evidenced by the absence of a Valide Sultan in the Privy purse during Osman’s reign and the high stipend of the Daye Hatun from middle 1620 onwards, an indication that she served as de facto Valide Sultan.

Death

Tezcan

According to historian Baki Tezcan, Mahfiruz passed away in 1610, if not earlier quoting ambassadorial reports during throughout Ahmed I’s reign, such as George Sandys who most probably reported in 1610, that the mother of firstborn prince had passed away, approximately two years later Venetian bailo, Simon Contarini writes that Osman went on the carriage rides with the "queen", furthermore Pietro Della Valle states that the mother of firsborn prince had already died, Cristoforo Valier between 1612 and 1615 states that Ahmed had two sons, two from dead sultana and two from sultana who was alive, That Mahfiruz is dead is also stated in a relation on the life and death of Nasuh Pasha, written sometime after Nasuh's execution in 1614, Achille de Harlay, baron de Sancy, the French ambassador to Constantinople, identifies Osman II in his letter to Louis XIII, the King of France, as "not the son of the living sultana, but the eldest named Osman, orphaned of his mother for ten years”, dated on February 26, 1618, the day of Osman's enthronement. He argues that the document cited by Uluçay as evidence for the year of her death does not in fact suggest that she died this same year. Günhan Börekçi quoted Tezcan's theory in his "A Queen-Mother at Work: On Handan Sultan and Her Regency During the Early Reign of Ahmed I".

Death as Valide Sultan

According to modern accounts Mahfiruz lived to become Valide Sultan, and as such, passed away on 26 or 28 October 1620.
According to the official website of Eyüp Cemetery, Mahfiruz passed away in 1628, thus witnessing the deposition and execution of her son in May of 1622 and her exile to the Old Palace upon Murad IV's accession in 1623.

Burial

Mahfiruz was buried in Eyüp Cemetery; the chronogram on her mausoleum suggests it was built by Osman in 1618. A poet, Kesbî, wrote on the occasion of her death: "Mahfiruz Valide Sultan, who was very devout, had the Qur'an recitation hall built next to the "Great Gate" in the Mausoleum of Eyüp Sultan. Her burial in this area is probably due to this; otherwise, she could have been buried in the mausoleum of her husband, Ahmed I. She is known as "Sahibei Hayrat" because of this Quran recitation hall. This hall still exists today, located in the courtyard of the fountain, between the Tomb of Beşir Ağa and the exit of the Eyüp Sultan Mausoleum. She must have donated copies of the Qur'an and other works to this room".

Issue

Mahfiruz and Ahmed I had at least three sons:
She was also probably, but not certainly, the mother of:

In popular culture