List of exomoon candidates


, there have been no positive confirmations of satellites of extra-solar planets ; however, some evidence in favour of their existence has been produced.

Timeline

  • — It has been surmised that J1407b, a possibly planetary-mass object that eclipsed the star V1400 Centauri in 2007, may have a few moons based on gaps observed in its circumstellar disk or ring system. Later studies have since found that J1407b is most likely a free-floating sub-brown dwarf or rogue planet, possibly less than 6 Jupiter masses.
  • — The confirmed hot Jupiter planet WASP-12b may also possess a moon.
  • , — A candidate exomoon of a free-floating planet MOA-2011-BLG-262L, was announced, but due to degeneracies in the modelling of the microlensing event, the observations can also be explained as a Neptune-mass planet orbiting a low-mass red dwarf, a scenario the authors consider to be more likely. In 2024 the latter scenario was confirmed.
  • — researchers using the Hubble Space Telescope published observations of the candidate exomoon Kepler-1625b I, which suggest that the host planet is likely several Jupiter masses, while the exomoon may have a mass and radius similar to Neptune. The study concluded that the exomoon hypothesis is the simplest and best explanation for the available observations, though warned that it is difficult to assign a precise probability to its existence and nature.
  • * — reanalysis concluded that the data was fit better by a planet-only model. According to this study, the discrepancy was an artifact of the data reduction, and Kepler-1625b I likely does not exist.
  • – A hypothesis involving potential transits of large exomoons being detached from their planets was posited to explain the light flux-variations of the Tabby's Star, which were identified from the data collected by Kepler space telescope.
  • — A paper by Chris Fox and Paul Wiegert examined the Kepler dataset for indications of exomoons solely from transit timing variations. Eight candidate signals were found that were consistent with an exomoon, however the signals could also be explained by the presence of another planet. Fox and Wiegert's conclusion was more and higher quality transit timing data would be required to establish whether these are truly moons or not. David Kipping re-derived the timings of six of the eight targets and evaluated the TTV evidence as uncompelling. The same study finds that Kepler-1625b I remains an exomoon candidate.
  • — astronomers reported an habitable-zone 1.7 [Earth radius|] exomoon candidate transiting one of the components in the planetary-mass binary 2MASS J1119-1137AB.
  • — an exomoon candidate was reported around the planet Kepler-1708b, and because it is orbiting a planet at approximately 1.6 AU from a star that is slightly more luminous than the Sun, it too could be within the habitable zone. However, this candidate is based on limited observations and some consider the data to be non-convincing.
  • — another exomoon candidate was reported around the planet Kepler-1513b. Unlike the previous giant exomoon candidates of Kepler-1625 and Kepler-1708, this exomoon would be terrestrial-mass, ranging from 0.76 Lunar masses to 0.34 Earth masses depending on the planet's mass and moon's orbital period.
  • * — a follow-up study by the same team found that the observed TTVs are caused by a second planet in the system, and not by a moon.
  • — The exomoon candidate around Kepler-1625b was again challenged, along with the Kepler-1708b candidate. This study argues that the statistical significance of these exomoon candidates is lower than previously claimed and that true giant exomoons would have stronger evidence. Evidence for exomoon transits may be caused by stellar activity in the Kepler light curves. Kipping's team published a response arguing that these exomoon candidates remain possible.
  • — New measurements with the Very Large Telescope of the star WASP-49 gave more evidences favoring the presence of a possible volcanically active-moon around the hot Jupiter WASP-49b.
  • * A similar study in 2025 with JWST suggested that the sulfur dioxide detection in the atmosphere of WASP-39b is due to the presence of a volcanically active-exomoon.
  • 2025 — While investigating HD 206893 B with the GRAVITY instrument at the Very Large Telescope, signs of a potential very massive exomoon was detected around HD 206893 B. If confirmed, the exomoon's mass should be 40% of Jupiter's mass.

Table

Host star
of the
host planet
Planet designationPlanet massPlanet
semimajor
axis
Exomoon
semimajor
axis
Exomoon
mass
Notes
N/AJ1407b N/A0.396–0.421 AU<0.8One possible exomoon residing in a 4 million km-wide gap in J1407b's circumplanetary disk. Other ring gaps in J1407b's disk may also contain exomoons.
Beta PictorisBeta Pictoris b9.3 10.260.03 to 0.05 AU≳15Found via the predicted misaligment of the planet's obliquity, which is yet to be confirmed by JWST observations but is currently likely.
N/A2MASS J1119-1137A or B3.7 3.6 ± 0.9
separation from each other
0.004 - 0.009 AU0.5 - 1Found using the transit method. A habitable-zone exomoon candidate transiting a directly imaged free-floating planet or isolated planetary-mass object.
N/A2MASS J2117-29407 N/A0.005 AU~0.5Candidate exomoon transit detected in Spitzer observations of 2MASS J21171431-2940034.
DH TauriDH Tauri b10.6 33010 AU318Candidate Jupiter-mass satellite from direct imaging. If confirmed, it could also be considered a planet orbiting a brown dwarf.
HD 189733HD 189733 b1.13 0.0310.0087 AU?Found by studying periodic increases and decreases in light given off from HD 189733 b. Outside of planet's Hill sphere.
HD 189733HD 189733 b1.13 0.031<0.00112 AU~ 0.015Exo-Io candidate; The sodium and potassium data at HD 189733b is consistent with evaporating exomoons and/or their corresponding gas torus.
Kepler-409Kepler-409b1.00 0.3200.222 RHill0.300Possible exomoon from transit timing variations, since deemed unlikely.
Kepler-517Kepler-517b7.59 0.2980.278 RHill0.499Possible exomoon from transit timing variations, since deemed unlikely.
Kepler-809Kepler-809b38.02 0.3080.289 RHill2.931Possible exomoon from transit timing variations.
Kepler-857Kepler-857b14.13 0.3760.208 RHill1.636Possible exomoon from transit timing variations.
Kepler-1000Kepler-1000b19.95 0.5340.235 RHill1.551Possible exomoon from transit timing variations, since deemed unlikely.
Kepler-1326Kepler-1326b24.55 0.26910.295 RHill6.057Possible exomoon from transit timing variations, since deemed unlikely.
Kepler-1442Kepler-1442b14.13 0.4050.208 RHill1.586Possible exomoon from transit timing variations, since deemed unlikely.
Kepler-1625Kepler-1625b 0.980.022 AU19.0Name: Kepler-1625b I.
Possible Neptune-sized exomoon or double planet, indicated by transit observations.
Kepler-1708Kepler-1708b 1.640.005 AU
Name: Kepler-1708b
Possible Neptune-sized exomoon or double planet, indicated by transit observations.
KOI-268KOI-268.019.33 0.470.217 RHill0.817Possible exomoon from transit timing variations, since deemed unlikely.
N/AMOA-2015-BLG-337L9.85 N/A0.24 AU33.7Found by microlensing; however it is unknown if the system is a super-Neptune-mass planet orbiting a free-floating planet, or a binary brown dwarf system.
WASP-12WASP-12b1.465 0.0232
WASP-12WASP-12b1.465 0.02326 RPFound by studying periodic increases and decreases in light given off from WASP-12b. Outside of planet's Hill sphere.
WASP-39WASP-39b0.275 0.0486~ 0.015
WASP-49WASP-49b0.37 0.0379< 1.74 RP~ 0.015Exo-Io candidate; The sodium exosphere around WASP-49b could be due to a volcanically active Io-like exomoon.
WASP-76WASP-76b0.92 0.0331.125 RP~ 0.015Exo-Io candidate; Sodium detected via absorption spectroscopy around WASP-76b is consistent with an extrasolar toroidal atmosphere generated by an evaporating exomoon.
WASP-121WASP-121b1.184 0.02544~ 1.9 RP~ 0.015Exo-Io candidate; The sodium detected via absorption spectroscopy around WASP-121b is consistent with an extrasolar gas torus possibly fueled by a hidden exo-Io.
HD 206893HD 206893 B ~ 0.22 AU~ 130Very large mass.