Kherwarian languages
The Kherwarian languages consist of non-Korku North Munda languages that are mainly spoken in Eastern Indian states of Jharkhand, West Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, Chhattisgarh and neighboring countries of Bangladesh, Nepal, and Bhutan. Together, Korku and the Kherwarian language continuum form the conventional North Munda branch of the Austroasiatic language family.
The Dravidian-speaking Kurukh people in Ranchi suburbs have adopted a creolized dialect of Kherwarian Mundari called Keraʔ Mundari. Its verbal morphology is less complex than an average Austroasiatic Kherwarian language.
Typology
Vowel harmony in Kherwarian affixes yields some differences depending on the nature of the vowel of the verb stem, while others do not. There are harmonic and non-harmonic affixes. In phonological lexical words, disyllables have certain vowel restrictions.Stress is fixedly released at the second syllable. LH prosodic word pattern is pervasive even in morphological words. Unlike Korku, the Kherwarian languages lack phonemic tones, giving a good reason for the Korku-Kherwarian classification of North Munda.
The Kherwarian languages, and to some extent, Korku and Kharia, also seems to lack discrete evidence for the existence of the usual parts of speech categories such as nouns, verbs, adjectives. One lexeme can do all the functions without any kind of morphological derivation.
Like many other Munda languages, the Kherwarian languages are pronominalized languages with complex verbal agreement systems. Double- and triple agreements, even with indexation of an possessor of the logical object or subject are possible. However, the ability to index a third argument is restricted to the Santali-esque languages such as Santali, Karmali, Mahali, and particular Santalized varieties of Ho, and the Mundari-esque languages do not. In some languages such as Kɔɖa, Turi, Birhor, the status of subject markers seems to be intermediate between suffix and clitic, suggesting a third subtype of Kherwarian.
1). Ho
2). Santali
3). Ho
Table below summarizes nominal markings using cases and postpositions in Kherwarian lects and Korku:
| Accusative | Dative | Oblique | Genitive | Instrumental | Comitative | Locative | Ablative | Allative | |
| Santali | -ʈʰɛn | -ren/-ak/-rɛak | -tɛ | -ʈʰɛn/-ʈʰɛtʃ | -rɛ | -kʰon | -sen/-setʃ | ||
| Mundari | -ke | -aʔ | -te | -re | -ate | ||||
| Keraʔ Mundari | -ke | -ta/-ke | -aʔ/-raʔ | -loŋ | -re | -se | |||
| Ho | -ren/-aʔ/-re-aʔ | -te | -loʔ | -re | -te | -te | |||
| Bhumij | -ren | -te | -lo | -re | -ate | -te | |||
| Birhor | -ke | -a/-ʈʰi/-ren | -te | -lo | -re | -te | -te | ||
| Korku | -khè | -kʰè | -à | -ten | -gon | -èn | -àten/-tan/-te | -ʈae |
Proto-North Munda indexation clitics were reconstructed by Pinnow, Anderson & Zide, and Anderson. Below is a chart showcasing reconstructions by Anderson and their modern reflex forms :
| . | . | . | . | |||||||||
| Santali | =ɲ | =laŋ | =liɲ | =bo | =le | =m | =ben | =pe | =e/=i | =kin | =ko | -i/-e |
| Mundari | =ɲ | =laŋ | =liŋ | =bu | =le | =m | =ben | =pe | =e/=i/=eʔ/=iʔ | =kiŋ | =ko | -Ø |
| Keraʔ Mundari | =ɲ | =laŋ | =liŋ | =bu | =le | =m | =bn | =pe | =e/=i/=iʔ | =kin | =ku | -e/aʔ |
| Ho | =iɲ | =laŋ | =liɲ | =bu | =le | =m | =ben | =pe | =e/=i/=ʔ/=eʔ/=Ø | =kiɲ | =ku | -e |
| Asuri | =iŋ/=n | =laŋ | =liŋ | =bu | =le | =m | =ben | =pe | =e | =kin | =ku | -Ø |
| Birhor | =iŋ/=ĩ | =laŋ | =liŋ | =bu | =le | =m/=me | =ben | =pe | =e | =kin | =ku | -Ø |
| Kɔɖa | =iŋ | =laŋ | =liŋ | =bu | =lɛ | =m/=p | =bɛn | =pɛ | =ɛ | =kin | =ku | -Ø |
| Turi | =ɛŋ/=ɲ | =laŋ | =liɲ | =pu | =lɛ | =m/=p | =bin | =pɛ | =ɛ | =kin | =ku | -Ø |
| Proto-North Munda | =iɲ/=iŋ | =laŋ | =liŋ | =bu | =le | =me | =ben | =pe | =e/=idʒ | =kiɲ/kiŋ | =ku/=ko |
Innovations
Low-level subgroup innovations of the Kherwarian languages include:- Active voice *-ˀt
- Causative -ocho, -ichi & ''-rika''