Iota subscript


The iota subscript is a diacritic mark in the Greek alphabet shaped like a small vertical stroke or miniature iota placed below the letter. It occurs with the vowel letters alpha, eta and omega, and represents the presence of an offglide after a long vowel, forming the so‐called "long diphthongs". Such diphthongs were phonologically distinct from the "short" diphthongs   of ancient Greek in the pre-classical and classical eras.
The offglide was gradually lost in pronunciation, a process that started already during the classical period and continued during the Hellenistic period, with the result that, from approximately the 1st century BC onwards, the former long diphthongs were no longer distinguished in pronunciation from their corresponding long vowels, respectively.
During the Roman and Byzantine eras, the iota in such diphthongs, by then mute, was sometimes still written as a standard letter, but was often simply omitted. The iota subscript was invented by Byzantine philologists in the 12th century AD as an editorial symbol, marking the places where such spelling variation occurred. The presence or absence of a mute iota can often help to reduce ambiguity, especially when dealing with inflectional affixes.
When the mute iota is written as a standard letter after its long vowel, as in, it is known as an iota adscript. In some editions, these iota adscripts may be reduced in size, as in, in order to distinguish them from regular lowercase iotas. In either case, iota adscripts do not carry diacritics, such as breathing marks or accents. In some editions, the iota adscript is used for uppercase letters and the iota subscript for lowercase letters, as in.
In uppercase-only environments, it is typical for the mute iota to be given in full-size when prioritising a faithful rendition of classical texts, as in, but lowercase or reduced may also occur for the sake of linguistic clarity.

Terminology

In Greek, the subscript is called , the perfect passive participle form of the verb ,. Analogously, the adscript is called προσγεγραμμένη, from the verb ,.
The Greek names are grammatically feminine participle forms, due to the fact that the name of the letter iota —to which they implicitly refer—was sometimes construed as a feminine noun in medieval Greek. The Greek terms, transliterated according to modern Greek as and respectively, were also chosen for use in character names in the character encoding standard Unicode.
As a phonological phenomenon, the original diphthongs denoted by are traditionally called "long diphthongs", which existed in the Greek language from archaic times into the classical period. From the tail end of the classical period onwards, the iota ceased to be pronounced, but it was sometimes still used in writing. In some English works, these monophthongized diphthongs are referred to as "improper diphthongs". In the medieval period, the iota subscript was innovated in order to distinguish these mute iotas from those which still affected the pronunciation, as they sometimes served as a useful way to distinguish two words that would otherwise be spelled in the same way.

Usage

The iota subscript occurs most frequently in certain inflectional affixes of ancient Greek, especially in the dative endings of many nominal forms, as well as in certain verb forms of the subjunctive mood. Besides these, it also occurs in the roots of certain words and names, such as ᾠδή and its derivatives , τραγῳδία , κωμῳδία , etc.), as well as ᾍδης , Τρῳός , Θρᾴκη , and so on.
In modern publications of ancient Greek texts, the mute iotas of long diphthongs are considered obligatory. There is some variation in how they are represented, but the iota subscript is typically used. In some editions of classical or pre-classical texts—such as Homer—the original pronunciation of long diphthongs is emphasized by the use of the iota adscript, with accents and breathing marks placed on the first vowel, as in for. The iota adscript is also widespread in works that aim to faithfully reproduce texts as they were originally written, such as those dealing with epigraphy, paleography or other philological disciplines, since the iota subscript is entirely absent from pre-medieval sources.
Different conventions exist for the treatment of mute iota with uppercase letters. In Western printing, the most common practice is to use subscript diacritics only in lowercase environments, as in, and to use an adscript instead whenever the host letter is capitalized, as in. When this happens in a mixed-case spelling environment, then the iota adscript regularly takes the shape of the normal lowercase iota letter, as in →. In an all-capitals environment, the adscript is also regularly capitalized. In Greece, a more common convention is to print the iota subscript with lowercase and uppercase letters alike. Yet another convention is to use lowercase iota adscripts both for mixed-case and for all-capitals words, as in, or to use a special glyph in the shape of a smaller capital iota in the latter case, as in.
In the standard monotonic orthography of modern Greek, iota subscript is not used. It had been generally retained in Katharevousa, the conservative, polytonic literary standard of Greece from the 18th to the 20th centuries, and it was also commonly used in Demotic publications from the 19th century onwards, but this ceased to be the case from 1982, when Demotic became the official literary standard. Even when standard Greek is spelled in the traditional polytonic system, there are few places where an iota subscript could occur, because most of its typical grammatical environments no longer occur: the dative case is not used in modern Greek, and the old spellings with in the subjunctive forms of verbs have been analogically replaced by those of the indicative,, as in →.

Use with upsilon

Generally, iota subscript does not occur with upsilon. The rare long diphthong might logically have been treated the same way as, and the works of Eustathius of Thessalonica provide a rare instance of this in the word , but this never became the convention, the same word being spelled by other writers as or .
Aside from its rarity, one possible explanation for this is the fact that the distinction between short and long was lost very early, if it ever existed at all. Unlike, where short > significantly diverged from long > over time, short had already merged with the long monophthong by the classical period—both being pronounced —leaving no room for long —also —to be distinct. As such, it is not at all certain that ancient Greek speakers ever considered and distinct at any point, rendering unnecessary. This lack of distinction is illustrated by the fact that the second in, rendered by Eustathius, is in fact etymologically short , not long as implied by the use of iota subscript, so it is unclear why the subscript was used.

Transliteration

In transliteration of Greek into the Latin alphabet, the iota subscript is often omitted. The Chicago Manual of Style, however, recommends the iota subscript be "transliterated by an on the line, following the vowel it is associated with."

Computer encoding

In the Unicode standard, iota subscript is represented by a non-spacing combining diacritic character U+0345 "Combining Greek Ypogegrammeni". There is also a spacing clone, as well as 36 precomposed characters, representing each of the usual combinations of iota subscript with lowercase α, η and ω, with and without various combinations of accent and breathing diacritics. In addition, for capitalized use, Unicode provides a corresponding set of 27 precomposed code points with prosgegrammeni. Despite the name prosgegrammeni, which implies the use of an adscript glyph, these code points are defined as being equivalent to a combination of the base letter and the combining subscript character U+0345, in the same fashion as their lowercase equivalents. They may be variously realized with either a subscript diacritic or a full-sized iota adscript glyph, depending on the font design. For use in all-capitals, Unicode additionally stipulates a special case-mapping rule according to which lowercase letters should be mapped to combinations of the uppercase letter and uppercase iota.
In the ASCII-based encoding standard Beta Code, the iota subscript is represented by the pipe character, as in for.