Daniel O. Dahlstrom wrote that it is not necessary to read Young's earlier books about Heidegger before Heidegger's Later Philosophy. He called it a "vibrant defense of Heidegger’s later philosophy" with three main merits: "its remarkably lucid style and economical structure", "its attempt to demonstrate the unity of Heidegger’s later philosophy" and "its appreciation of Heidegger’s restrained confidence in the concrete power of human thinking". Miles Groth called it a "small but rich volume" with "a number of fresh interpretations of familiarthemes in Heidegger scholarship".