Gamow factor


The Gamow factor, Sommerfeld factor or Gamow–Sommerfeld factor, named after physicists George Gamow and Arnold Sommerfeld, is a probability factor for two nuclear particles' chance of overcoming the Coulomb barrier in order to undergo nuclear reactions, for example in nuclear fusion. By classical physics, there is almost no possibility for protons to fuse by crossing each other's Coulomb barrier at temperatures commonly observed to cause fusion, such as those found in the Sun. In 1927 it was discovered that there is a significant chance for nuclear fusion due to quantum tunnelling.
While the probability of overcoming the Coulomb barrier increases rapidly with increasing particle energy, for a given temperature, the probability of a particle having such an energy falls off very fast, as described by the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution. Gamow found that, taken together, these effects mean that for any given temperature, the particles that fuse are mostly in a temperature-dependent narrow range of energies known as the Gamow window. The maximum of the distribution is called the Gamow peak.

Description

When two positively charged nuclei approach each other, they are repulsed by the strong electric field between them – the Coulomb barrier. In order to undergo a nuclear reaction, the nuclei must quantum-tunnel through the barrier. The probability of this happening is proportional to the following factor:
where is the Gamow energy
where is the reduced mass of the two particles. The constant is the fine-structure constant, is the speed of light, and and are the respective atomic numbers of each particle.
It is sometimes rewritten using the Sommerfeld parameter, such that
where is a dimensionless quantity used in nuclear astrophysics in the calculation of reaction rates between two nuclei. It is defined as
where is the elementary charge, is the magnitude of the relative incident velocity in the centre-of-mass frame.

''S''-factor

The probability of a nuclear reaction is proportional to the probability that the particles penetrate the barrier, times the probability that they react upon doing so. The latter probability is described by the astrophysical S-factor.
The S-factor depends on the complicated strong force interactions between the nuclei, and thus nonlinearly depends on particle energy. It is defined as
where is the cross section, a measure of the total reaction probability.
The Coulomb barrier causes the cross section to have a strong exponential dependence on. The S-factor remedies this by factoring out the Coulomb component of the cross section and the DeBroglie wavelength. For nuclear reactions without resonances, varies less with than does. Thus, is a useful reparameterization of.

Gamow peak

For an ideal gas, the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution is proportional to
where is the average squared speed of all particles, is the Boltzmann constant and T is absolute temperature.
The fusion probability is the product of the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution factor and the Gamow factor
The maximum of the fusion probability is given by which yields
This quantity is known as the Gamow peak.
Expanding around gives:
where
is the Gamow window.

Derivation

1D problem

The derivation consists in the one-dimensional case of quantum tunnelling using the WKB approximation. Considering a wave function of a particle of mass m, we take area 1 to be where a wave is emitted, area 2 the potential barrier which has height V and width l, and area 3 its other side, where the wave is arriving, partly transmitted and partly reflected. For wave numbers k and energy E we get:
where and both in . This is solved for given A and phase α by taking the boundary conditions at the barrier edges, at and : there and its derivatives must be equal on both sides. For, this is easily solved by ignoring the time exponential and considering the real part alone. We get, up to factors
  • depending on the β phases which are typically of order 1, and
  • of the order of :
and
Next, the alpha decay can be modelled as a symmetric one-dimensional problem, with a standing wave between two symmetric potential barriers at and, and emitting waves at both outer sides of the barriers. Solving this can in principle be done by taking the solution of the first problem, translating it by and gluing it to an identical solution reflected around.
Due to the symmetry of the problem, the emitting waves on both sides must have equal amplitudes, but their phases may be different. This gives a single extra parameter; however, gluing the two solutions at requires two boundary conditions, so in general there is no solution. In particular, re-writing as a sum of a cosine and a sine of, each having a different factor that depends on k and β; the factor of the sine must vanish, so that the solution can be glued symmetrically to its reflection. Since the factor is in general complex, this can in general be solved by adding an imaginary part of k, which gives the extra parameter needed. Thus E will have an imaginary part as well.
The physical meaning of this is that the standing wave in the middle decays; the waves newly emitted have therefore smaller amplitudes, so that their amplitude decays in time but grows with distance. The decay constant, denoted λ , is assumed small compared to.
λ can be estimated without solving explicitly, by noting its effect on the probability current conservation law. Since the probability flows from the middle to the sides, we have:
note the factor of 2 is due to having two emitted waves.
Taking, this gives:
Since the quadratic dependence on is negligible relative to its exponential dependence, we may write:
Remembering the imaginary part added to k is much smaller than the real part, we may now neglect it and get:
Note that is the particle velocity, so the first factor is the classical rate by which the particle trapped between the barriers hits them.

3D problem

Finally, moving to the three-dimensional problem, the spherically symmetric Schrödinger equation reads :
Since amounts to enlarging the potential, and therefore substantially reducing the decay rate : we focus on, and get a very similar problem to the previous one with, except that now the potential as a function of r is not a step function. In short
The main effect of this on the amplitudes is that we must replace the argument in the exponent, taking an integral of over the distance where rather than multiplying by width l. We take the Coulomb potential:
where is the vacuum electric permittivity, e the electron charge, z = 2 is the charge number of the alpha particle and Z the charge number of the nucleus. The integration limits are then:
where we assume the nuclear potential energy is still relatively small, and
, which is where the nuclear negative potential energy is large enough so that the overall potential is smaller than E.
Thus, the argument of the exponent in λ is:
This can be solved by substituting and then and solving for θ, giving:
where. Since x is small, the x-dependent factor is of the order 1.
Assuming, the x-dependent factor can be replaced by giving:
with
Which is the same as the formula given in the beginning of the article with, and the fine-structure constant
For a radium alpha decay, Z = 88, z = 2 and m ≈ 4mp, EG is approximately 50 GeV. Gamow calculated the slope of with respect to E at an energy of 5 MeV to be ~ 1014 J−1, compared to the experimental value of.

History

In 1927, Ernest Rutherford published an article in Philosophical Magazine on a problem related to Hans Geiger's 1921 experiment of scattering alpha particles from uranium. Previous experiments with thorium C' confirmed that uranium has a Coulomb barrier of 8.57 MeV, however uranium emitted alpha particles of 4.2 MeV. The emitted energy was too low to overcome the barrier. On 29 July 1928, George Gamow, and independently the next day Ronald Wilfred Gurney and Edward Condon submitted their solution based on quantum tunnelling to the journal Zeitschrift für Physik. Their work was based on previous work on tunnelling by J. Robert Oppenheimer, Gregor Wentzel, Lothar Wolfgang Nordheim, and Ralph H. Fowler. Gurney and Condon cited also Friedrich Hund.
In 1931, Arnold Sommerfeld introduced a similar factor for the discussion of bremsstrahlung.
Gamow popularized his personal version of the discovery in his 1970's book, ''My World Line: An Informal Autobiography.''

Examples

The Gamow energies for some common nuclear fusion reactions are given in kiloelectronvolts below, as well as the low-energy limits of the astrophysical S-factors in kiloelectronvolt–barns.
Reaction
D + T → α + n118034.412000
D + D → T + p98631.456
D + D → 3He + n98631.454
D + 3He → α + p473068.85900
p + 11B → α + α + α22600150.32
p + p → D + e+ + ν49322.24.0
p + D → 3He + 65725.62.5
3He + 3He → α + p + p23700153.85400
p + 12C → 13N + 32800181.01.34
p + 13C → 14N + 32900181.57.6
p + 14N → 15O + 45100212.33.5
p + 15N → 12C + α45300212.867500