Pushout (category theory)


In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a pushout is the colimit of a diagram consisting of two morphisms f : ZX and g : ZY with a common domain. The pushout consists of an object P along with two morphisms XP and YP that complete a commutative square with the two given morphisms f and g. In fact, the defining universal property of the pushout essentially says that the pushout is the "most general" way to complete this commutative square. Common notations for the pushout are and.
The pushout is the categorical dual of the pullback.

Universal property

Explicitly, the pushout of the morphisms f and g consists of an object P and two morphisms i1 : XP and i2 : YP such that the diagram
commutes and such that is universal with respect to this diagram. That is, for any other such triple for which the following diagram commutes, there must exist a unique u : PQ also making the diagram commute:
As with all universal constructions, the pushout, if it exists, is unique up to a unique isomorphism.

Examples of pushouts

Here are some examples of pushouts in familiar categories. Note that in each case, we are only providing a construction of an object in the isomorphism class of pushouts; as mentioned above, though there may be other ways to construct it, they are all equivalent.

Properties

  • Whenever the pushout A ⊔C B exists, then B ⊔C A exists as well and there is a natural isomorphism A ⊔C BB ⊔C A.
  • In an abelian category all pushouts exist, and they preserve cokernels in the following sense: if is the pushout of f : ZX and g : ZY, then the natural map coker → coker is an isomorphism, and so is the natural map coker → coker.
  • There is a natural isomorphism  ⊔B DAC D. Explicitly, this means:
  • * if maps f : CA, g : CB and h : BD are given and
  • * the pushout of f and g is given by i : AP and j : BP, and
  • * the pushout of j and h is given by k : PQ and l : DQ,
  • * then the pushout of f and hg is given by ki : AQ and l : DQ.

Construction via coproducts and coequalizers

Pushouts are equivalent to coproducts and coequalizers in the sense that:
  • Coproducts are a pushout from the initial object, and the coequalizer of f, g : XY is the pushout of and, so if there are pushouts, then there are coequalizers and coproducts;
  • Pushouts can be constructed from coproducts and coequalizers, as described below.
All of the above examples may be regarded as special cases of the following very general construction, which works in any category C satisfying:
  • For any objects A and B of C, their coproduct exists in C;
  • For any morphisms j and k of C with the same domain and the same target, the coequalizer of j and k exists in C.
In this setup, we obtain the pushout of morphisms f : ZX and g : ZY by first forming the coproduct of the targets X and Y. We then have two morphisms from Z to this coproduct. We can either go from Z to X via f, then include into the coproduct, or we can go from Z to Y via g, then include into the coproduct. The pushout of f and g is the coequalizer of these new maps.

Application: the Seifert–van Kampen theorem

The Seifert–van Kampen theorem answers the following question. Suppose we have a path-connected space, covered by path-connected open subspaces and whose intersection is also path-connected. If we know the fundamental groups of, and can we recover the fundamental group of ? The answer is yes, provided we also know the induced homomorphisms
and
The theorem then says that the fundamental group of is the pushout of these two induced maps. Most obviously, is the pushout of the two inclusion maps of into and. Thus we may interpret the theorem as confirming that the fundamental group functor preserves pushouts of inclusions. We might expect this to be simplest when is simply connected, since then both homomorphisms above have trivial domain. Indeed, this is the case, since then the pushout reduces to the free product, which is the coproduct in the category of groups. In a most general case we will be speaking of a free product with amalgamation.
There is a detailed exposition of this, in a slightly more general setting in the book by J. P. May listed in the references.