Isomorphism


In mathematics, an isomorphism is a structure-preserving mapping or morphism between two structures of the same type that can be reversed by an inverse mapping. Two mathematical structures are isomorphic if an isomorphism exists between them, and this is often denoted as. The word is derived.
The interest in isomorphisms lies in the fact that two isomorphic objects have the same properties. Thus isomorphic structures cannot be distinguished from the point of view of structure only, and may often be identified. In mathematical jargon, one says that two objects are the same up to an isomorphism. A common example where isomorphic structures cannot be identified is when the structures are substructures of a larger one. For example, all subspaces of dimension one of a vector space are isomorphic and cannot be identified.
An automorphism is an isomorphism from a structure to itself. An isomorphism between two structures is a canonical isomorphism if there is only one isomorphism between the two structures, or if the isomorphism is much more natural than other isomorphisms. For example, for every prime number, all fields with elements are canonically isomorphic, with a unique isomorphism. The isomorphism theorems provide canonical isomorphisms that are not unique.
The term is mainly used for algebraic structures and categories. In the case of algebraic structures, mappings are called homomorphisms, and a homomorphism is an isomorphism if and only if it is bijective.
In various areas of mathematics, isomorphisms have received specialized names, depending on the type of structure under consideration. For example:
Category theory, which can be viewed as a formalization of the concept of mapping between structures, provides a language that may be used to unify the approach to these different aspects of the basic idea.

Examples

Logarithm and exponential

Let be the multiplicative group of positive real numbers, and let be the additive group of real numbers.
The logarithm function satisfies for all so it is a group homomorphism. The exponential function satisfies for all so it too is a homomorphism.
The identities and show that and are inverses of each other. So,
are group isomorphisms that are inverse of each other.
The function is an isomorphism which translates multiplication of positive real numbers into addition of real numbers. This facility makes it possible to multiply real numbers using a ruler and a table of logarithms, or using a slide rule with a logarithmic scale.

Integers modulo 6

Consider the ring of the integers from 0 to 5 with addition and multiplication modulo 6. Also consider the ring of the ordered pairs where the first element is an integer modulo 2 and the second element is an integer modulo 3, with component-wise addition and multiplication modulo 2 and 3.
These rings are isomorphic under the following map:
or in general
For example, which translates in the other system as
This is a special case of the Chinese remainder theorem which asserts that, if and are coprime integers, the ring of the integers modulo is isomorphic to the direct product of the integers modulo and the integers modulo.

Relation-preserving isomorphism

If one object consists of a set X with a binary relation R and the other object consists of a set Y with a binary relation S then an isomorphism from X to Y is a bijective function such that:
S is reflexive, irreflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, asymmetric, transitive, total, trichotomous, a partial order, total order, well-order, strict weak order, total preorder, an equivalence relation, or a relation with any other special properties, if and only if R is.
For example, R is an ordering ≤ and S an ordering then an isomorphism from X to Y is a bijective function such that
Such an isomorphism is called an or an.
If then this is a relation-preserving automorphism.

Applications

In algebra, isomorphisms are defined for all algebraic structures. Some are more specifically studied; for example:
  • Linear isomorphisms between vector spaces; they are specified by invertible matrices.
  • Group isomorphisms between groups; the classification of isomorphism classes of finite groups is an open problem.
  • Ring isomorphisms between rings.
  • Field isomorphisms are the same as ring isomorphism between fields; their study, and more specifically the study of field automorphisms is an important part of Galois theory.
Just as the automorphisms of an algebraic structure form a group, the isomorphisms between two algebras sharing a common structure form a heap. Letting a particular isomorphism identify the two structures turns this heap into a group.
In mathematical analysis, the Laplace transform is an isomorphism mapping hard differential equations into easier algebraic equations.
In graph theory, an isomorphism between two graphs G and H is a bijective map f from the vertices of G to the vertices of H that preserves the "edge structure" in the sense that there is an edge from vertex u to vertex v in G if and only if there is an edge from to in H. See graph isomorphism.
In order theory, an isomorphism between two partially ordered sets P and Q is a bijective map from P to Q that preserves the order structure in the sense that for any elements and of P we have less than in P if and only if is less than in Q. As an example, the set of whole numbers ordered by the is-a-factor-of relation is isomorphic to the set of blood types ordered by the can-donate-to relation. See order isomorphism.
In mathematical analysis, an isomorphism between two Hilbert spaces is a bijection preserving addition, scalar multiplication, and inner product.
In early theories of logical atomism, the formal relationship between facts and true propositions was theorized by Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein to be isomorphic. An example of this line of thinking can be found in Russell's Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy.
In cybernetics, the good regulator theorem or Conant–Ashby theorem is stated as "Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system". Whether regulated or self-regulating, an isomorphism is required between the regulator and processing parts of the system.

Category theoretic view

In category theory, given a category C, an isomorphism is a morphism that has an inverse morphism that is, and
Two categories and are isomorphic if there exist functors and which are mutually inverse to each other, that is, and .

Isomorphism vs. bijective morphism

In a concrete category, such as the category of topological spaces or categories of algebraic objects, an isomorphism must be bijective on the underlying sets. In algebraic categories, an isomorphism is the same as a homomorphism which is bijective on underlying sets. However, there are concrete categories in which bijective morphisms are not necessarily isomorphisms.

Isomorphism class

Since a composition of isomorphisms is an isomorphism, the identity is an isomorphism, and the inverse of an isomorphism is an isomorphism, the relation that two mathematical objects are isomorphic is an equivalence relation. An equivalence class given by isomorphisms is commonly called an isomorphism class.

Examples

Examples of isomorphism classes are plentiful in mathematics.
However, there are circumstances in which the isomorphism class of an object conceals vital information about it.
  • Given a mathematical structure, it is common that two substructures belong to the same isomorphism class. However, the way they are included in the whole structure can not be studied if they are identified. For example, in a finite-dimensional vector space, all subspaces of the same dimension are isomorphic, but must be distinguished to consider their intersection, sum, etc.
  • In homotopy theory, the fundamental group of a space at a point, though technically denoted to emphasize the dependence on the base point, is often written lazily as simply if is path connected. The reason for this is that the existence of a path between two points allows one to identify loops at one with loops at the other; however, unless is abelian this isomorphism is non-unique. Furthermore, the classification of covering spaces makes strict reference to particular subgroups of, specifically distinguishing between isomorphic but conjugate subgroups, and therefore amalgamating the elements of an isomorphism class into a single featureless object seriously decreases the level of detail provided by the theory.