| Cipher | Security claim | Best attack | Publish date | Comment |
| AES128 | 2128 | | 2011-08-17 | Independent biclique attack. |
| AES192 | 2192 | | 2011-08-17 | Independent biclique attack. |
| AES256 | 2256 | | 2011-08-17 | Independent biclique attack. |
| Blowfish | Up to 2448 | 4 of 16 rounds; 64-bit block is vulnerable to SWEET32 attack. | 2016 | Differential cryptanalysis. Author of Blowfish recommends using Twofish instead. SWEET32 attack demonstrated birthday attacks to recover plaintext with its 64-bit block size, vulnerable to protocols such as TLS, SSH, IPsec, and OpenVPN, without attacking the cipher itself. |
| Twofish | 2128 – 2256 | 6 of 16 rounds | 1999-10-05 | Impossible differential attack. |
| Serpent-128 | 2128 | 10 of 32 rounds | 2002-02-04 | Linear cryptanalysis. |
| Serpent-192 | 2192 | 11 of 32 rounds | 2002-02-04 | Linear cryptanalysis. |
| Serpent-256 | 2256 | 11 of 32 rounds | 2002-02-04 | Linear cryptanalysis. |
| DES | 256 | 239 – 243 time, 243 known plaintexts | 2001 | Linear cryptanalysis. In addition, broken by brute force in 256 time, no later than 1998-07-17, see EFF DES cracker. Cracking hardware is available for purchase since 2006. |
| 2168 | 2113 time, 232 data, 288 memory; 64-bit block is vulnerable to SWEET32 attack. | 2016 | Extension of the meet-in-the-middle attack. Time complexity is 2113 steps, but along with proposed techniques, it is estimated to be equivalent to 290 single DES encryption steps. The paper also proposes other time–memory tradeoffs. SWEET32 attack demonstrated birthday attacks to recover plaintext with its 64-bit block size, vulnerable to protocols such as TLS, SSH, IPsec, and OpenVPN. |
| KASUMI | 2128 | 232 time, 226 data, 230 memory, 4 related keys | 2010-01-10 | The cipher used in 3G cell phone networks. This attack takes less than two hours on a single PC, but isn't applicable to 3G due to known plaintext and related key requirements. |
| RC4 | Up to 22048 | | 2007 | Commonly known as PTW attack, it can break WEP encryption in Wi-Fi on an ordinary computer in negligible time. This is an improvement of the original Fluhrer, Mantin and Shamir attack published in 2001. |
| Cipher | Security claim | Best attack | Publish date | Comment |
| CAST | 264 | 248 time, 217 chosen plaintexts | 1997-11-11 | Related-key attack. |
| CAST-128 | 2128 | 6 of 16 rounds | 2009-08-23 | Known-plaintext linear cryptanalysis. |
| CAST-256 | 2256 | 24 of 48 rounds | 2009-08-23 | Known-plaintext linear cryptanalysis. |
| IDEA | 2128 | | 2012-04-15 | Narrow-biclique attack. |
| MISTY1 | 2128 | | 2015-07-30 | Chosen-ciphertext, integral cryptanalysis, an improvement over a previous chosen-plaintext attack. |
| RC2 | 264 – 2128 | Unknown time, 234 chosen plaintexts | 1997-11-11 | Related-key attack. |
| RC5 | 2128 | | | |
| SEED | 2128 | | | |
| Skipjack | 280 | 280 | | ECRYPT II recommendations note that, as of 2012, 80 bit ciphers provide only "Very short-term protection against agencies". NIST recommends not to use Skipjack after 2010. |
| TEA | 2128 | | 1997-11-11 | Related-key attack. |
| XTEA | 2128 | | | |
| XXTEA | 2128 | 259 chosen plaintexts | 2010-05-04 | Chosen-plaintext, differential cryptanalysis. |