List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 92


This is a list of cases reported in volume 92 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1876, along with two cases from 1875.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 92 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in 92 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
Morrison WaiteChief JusticeOhioSalmon P. Chase


March 23, 1888
Nathan CliffordAssociate JusticeMaineBenjamin Robbins Curtis


July 25, 1881
Noah Haynes SwayneAssociate JusticeOhioJohn McLean


January 24, 1881
Samuel Freeman MillerAssociate JusticeIowaPeter Vivian Daniel


October 13, 1890
David DavisAssociate JusticeIllinoisJohn Archibald Campbell


March 4, 1877
Stephen Johnson FieldAssociate JusticeCalifornianewly created seat


December 1, 1897
William StrongAssociate JusticePennsylvaniaRobert Cooper Grier


December 14, 1880
Joseph P. BradleyAssociate JusticeNew Jerseynewly created seat


January 22, 1892
Ward HuntAssociate JusticeNew YorkSamuel Nelson


January 27, 1882

Notable Cases in 92 U.S.

''United States v. Reese''

United States v. Reese,, was a voting rights case in which the Supreme Court narrowly construed the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which provides that suffrage for citizens can not be restricted due to race, color, or the individual having previously been a slave. The Court held that the 15th Amendment did not confer the right of suffrage, but only prohibited exclusion on racial grounds from a pre-existing right to vote.

''Chy Lung v Freeman''

Chy Lung v. Freeman,, involved 22 women from China, including Chy Lung, among the passengers on the steamer Japan that journeyed from China to San Francisco, arriving in 1875. The immigration commissioner examined the passengers and, acting under a California statute, identified Chy Lung and the others as "lewd and debauched women". The captain detained the women on board. The women obtained a writ of habeas corpus, which led to them being moved into the custody of the Sheriff of San Francisco, where they stayed awaiting deportation upon the return of Japan, which had already left for China. The women refused to be deported to China and appealed the decision to deport them. The California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the statute that was used to deny them entry, and it upheld their deportation. The women appealed the decision in the US Supreme Court. The Court decided unanimously in favor of Chy Lung. It held that the federal government, and not state governments, was in charge of immigration policy and diplomatic relations with other nations; it was not up to California to impose restrictions on Chinese immigration.

''United States v. Cruikshank''

In United States v. Cruikshank,, the Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to private actors or to state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision represented a major blow to federal efforts to protect the civil rights of African Americans. The case arose from the hotly-disputed 1872 Louisiana gubernatorial election and the subsequent Colfax massacre, in which dozens of black people and three white people were killed. Federal charges were brought against several white insurgents under the Enforcement Act of 1870, which prohibited two or more people from conspiring to deprive anyone of their constitutional rights. Charges included hindering the freedmen's First Amendment right to freely assemble and their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. In his majority opinion, Chief Justice Morrison Waite overturned the convictions of the defendants, holding that the plaintiffs had to rely on state courts for protection. Waite opined that neither the First Amendment nor the Second Amendment applied to the actions of state governments or to individuals, but only to the federal government; also that the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applied to the actions of state governments, but not to individuals. The decision left African Americans in the South at the mercy of increasingly hostile state governments dominated by white Democratic legislatures, and allowed groups such as the Ku Klux Klan to continue to use paramilitary force to suppress black voting.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 92 U.S.

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower CourtDisposition
Blease v. GarlingtonWaitenonenoneC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Gaines v. FuentesFieldnoneBradleyLa.reversed
Hall v. United StatesSwaynenonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
The City of WashingtonCliffordnonenoneC.C.E.D.N.Y.affirmed
Roberts v. United StatesBradleynoneSwayneCt. Cl.reversed
Farnsworth v. Minnesota and Pacific Railroad CompanyFieldnonenoneC.C.D. Minn.affirmed
Shuey v. United StatesStrongnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
United States v. LandersFieldnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
O'Brien v. WeldHuntnonenoneN.Y. Sup. Ct.reversed
Cheatham v. United StatesMillernonenoneC.C.M.D. Tenn.affirmed
Walker v. SauvinetWaitenonenoneLa.affirmed
Magee v. Manhattan Life Insurance CompanySwaynenonenoneC.C.S.D. Ala.affirmed
Neblett v. MacFarlandHuntnonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
Totten v. United StatesFieldnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Stott v. RutherfordSwaynenonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.reversed
Harrison v. MyerCliffordnonenoneLa.affirmed
Kittredge v. RaceBradleynonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
First National Bank v. National Exchange BankWaitenonenoneMd.affirmed
Rockhold v. RockholdWaitenonenoneTenn.dismissed
Phillips v. PayneSwaynenonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Wills v. ClaflinDavisnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Markey v. LangleySwaynenonenoneC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Terry v. TubmanHuntnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ga.affirmed
Hoffman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanySwaynenonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohioaffirmed
Whitfield v. United StatesWaitenonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Carey v. BrownSwaynenonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
Baker v. WhiteMillernonenoneC.C.D. Conn.dismissed
Burbank v. BigelowBradleynonenoneC.C.D. La.reversed
Smith v. VodgesSwaynenonenoneC.C.E.D. Pa.reversed
Lamar v. BrowneWaitenoneFieldC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Wallach v. Van RiswickStrongnonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.reversed
United States v. ReeseWaitenoneClifford; HuntC.C.D. Ky.affirmed
Montgomery v. Bucyrus Machine WorksDavisnonenoneC.C.W.D. Mo.affirmed
Henderson v. City of New YorkMillernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Chy Lung v. FreemanMillernonenoneCal.reversed
United States v. RossStrongnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
New York Life Insurance Company v. HendrenWaitenoneBradleyVa.dismissed
Elmwood Township v. MarcyDavisnoneStrongC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Chamberlain v. St. Paul and Sioux City Railroad CompanyFieldnonenoneC.C.D. Minn.affirmed
Laramie County v. Albany CountyCliffordnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Wyo.affirmed
Republican River Bridge Company v. Kansas Pacific Railway CompanyMillernonenoneKan.affirmed
Wilson v. BoyceHuntnonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.affirmed
Brown v. AtwellWaitenonenoneN.Y. Sup. Ct.dismissed
Angle v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCliffordnonenoneC.C.D. Iowareversed
Oaksmith's Lessee v. JohnsonFieldnonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Reckendorfer v. FaberHuntnoneStrongC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Potts v. ChumaseroWaitenonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Mont.dismissed
Scammon v. KimballCliffordnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Pace v. BurgessBradleynonenoneC.C.E.D. Va.affirmed
Piedmont and Arlington Life Insurance Company v. EwingMillernonenoneC.C.W.D. Mo.reversed
Savage v. United StatesCliffordnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Smeltzer v. WhiteStrongnonenoneC.C.D. Iowaaffirmed
Hobson v. LordCliffordnoneBradleyC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Butler v. ThomsonHuntnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Clements v. MacheboeufCliffordnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Colo.affirmed
Ives v. HamiltonBradleynonenoneC.C.E.D. Mich.affirmed
The AmericaCliffordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
The GalateaCliffordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Otis v. CullumSwaynenonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Barney v. WatsonBradleynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Terry v. Commercial Bank of AlabamaMillernonenoneC.C.S.D. Ala.affirmed
Williams v. United StatesCliffordnonenoneD. Cal.affirmed
City of St Louis v. United StatesMillernonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Tyng v. GrinnellCliffordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Miller v. DaleFieldnonenoneCal.affirmed
Kennard v. Louisiana ex rel. MorganWaitenonenoneLa.affirmed
Town of Coloma v. EavesStrongBradleynoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Town of Venice v. MurdockStrongnonenoneC.C.N.D.N.Y.affirmed
Town of Genoa v. WoodruffStrongnonenoneC.C.N.D.N.Y.affirmed
Converse v. City of Ft. ScottStrongnonenoneC.C.N.D. Kan.reversed
Carrol v. GreenSwaynenonenoneC.C.D.S.C.reversed
Franklin Fire Insurance Company v. VaughanHuntnonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.affirmed
United States v. DiekelmanWaitenonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Board of Liquidation of Louisiana v. McCombBradleynonenoneC.C.D. La.multiple
United States v. CruikshankWaitenoneCliffordC.C.D. La.affirmed
Harshman v. Bates CountyBradleynonenoneC.C.W.D. Mo.affirmed
State Railroad Tax CasesMillernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Lewis v. United StatesSwaynenonenoneC.C.E.D. Pa.affirmed
Town of Concord v. Portsmouth Savings BankStrongnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Moultrie County v. Rockingham Ten-Cent Savings BankStrongnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ill.affirmed
Marcy v. Oswego TownshipStrongnonenoneC.C.D. Kan.reversed
Humboldt Township v. LongStrongnoneMillerC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Intermingled Cotton CasesWaitenonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Morrison v. JacksonCliffordnonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.affirmed
[Central of Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia Railway|Central Railroad and Banking Company of Georgia] v. GeorgiaStrongnonenoneGa.reversed
South-Western Railroad and Banking Company of Georgia v. GeorgiaStrongnonenoneGa.reversed
Branch v. City of CharlestonBradleynonenoneC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Garsed v. BeallCliffordnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ga.affirmed
The AlabamaBradleynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Hot Springs CasesBradleynonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Burdell v. DenigMillernonenoneC.C.S.D. Ohioreversed
McStay v. FriedmanWaitenonenoneCal.dismissed
Hammond v. Mason and Hamlin Organ CompanyMillernonenoneC.C.D. Mass.affirmed
Hall v. WeareStrongnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.reversed
Leavenworth, Lawrence and Galveston Railroad Company v. United StatesDavisnoneFieldC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Missouri, Kansas, and Texas Railway Company v. United StatesDavisnonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Newhall v. SangerDavisnoneFieldC.C.D. Cal.reversed