List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 169


This is a list of cases reported in volume 169 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1898.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 169 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court...". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six. Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices.
When the cases in volume 169 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville FullerChief JusticeIllinoisMorrison Waite


July 4, 1910
John Marshall HarlanAssociate JusticeKentuckyDavid Davis


October 14, 1911
Horace GrayAssociate JusticeMassachusettsNathan Clifford


September 15, 1902
David Josiah BrewerAssociate JusticeKansasStanley Matthews


March 28, 1910
Henry Billings BrownAssociate JusticeMichiganSamuel Freeman Miller


May 28, 1906
George Shiras Jr.Associate JusticePennsylvaniaJoseph P. Bradley


February 23, 1903
Edward Douglass WhiteAssociate JusticeLouisianaSamuel Blatchford


December 18, 1910
Rufus W. PeckhamAssociate JusticeNew YorkHowell Edmunds Jackson


October 24, 1909
Joseph McKennaAssociate JusticeCaliforniaStephen Johnson Field


January 5, 1925

Notable Cases in 169 U.S.

''Holden v. Hardy''

In Holden v. Hardy,, the Supreme Court held that a limitation on working time for miners and smelters was constitutional. The decision stated that the Utah law was a legitimate exercise of the state's police power; that such a law is legitimate if there is indeed a rational basis, supported by facts, for the legislature to believe particular work conditions are dangerous.

''United States v. Wong Kim Ark''

United States v. Wong Kim Ark,, is a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", is a U.S. citizen. This is due to the first clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.'" This decision established an important precedent in the interpretation of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction. There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 169 U.S.

Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinionDissenting opinionLower CourtDisposition
Stuart v. HaydenHarlannonenone8th Cir.affirmed
United States v. PassavantFullernoneBrown2d Cir.certification
Hetzel v. Baltimore & O.R.R. Co.HarlannonenoneD.C. Cir.reversed
In re Boardman ex rel. DurrantFullernonenone9th Cir.habeas corpus denied
Building & Loan Ass'n v. PricePeckhamnonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.reversed
Williams v. PainePeckhamnonenoneD.C. Cir.affirmed
Holder v. Aultman M. & Co.GraynonenoneC.C.E.D. Mich.affirmed
Powers v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.GraynonenoneC.C.D. Ky.affirmed
Union M.L. Ins. Co. v. KirchoffFullernonenoneIll.dismissed
Wetmore v. RymerShirasnonenoneC.C.E.D. Tenn.reversed
Richardson v. Louisville & N.R.R. Co.FullernonenoneFla.affirmed
Chicago et al. Ry. Co. v. SolanGraynonenoneIowaaffirmed
Ritter v. Mutual L. Ins. Co.Harlannonenone3d Cir.affirmed
Benjamin v. City of New OrleansFullernonenone5th Cir.dismissed
Cessna v. United StatesBrewernonenoneCt. Priv. Land Cl.affirmed
Baker v. CummingsWhitenonenoneD.C. Cir.reversed
United States v. KlumppFullernonenone2d Cir.reversed
Barrett v. United States IFullernonenoneC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Barrett v. United States IIFullernonenoneW.D.S.C.affirmed
Levis v. KenglaGraynonenoneD.C. Cir.affirmed
Wetzel v. Minnesota et al. Co.Brownnonenone8th Cir.affirmed
Dull v. BlackmanBrewernonenoneIowaaffirmed
United States v. City of LouisvillePeckhamnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Logan County v. United StatesPeckhamnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Thomas v. GayShirasnonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Okla.reversed
Baker v. GricePeckhamnonenoneC.C.N.D. Tex.reversed
Willis v. Eastern T. & B. Co.GraynonenoneD.C. Cir.reversed
Richmond & A.R.R. Co. v. R.A. Patterson T. Co.WhitenonenoneVa.affirmed
United States v. GarlingerShirasnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Payne v. RobertsonWhitenonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Okla.affirmed
United States v. EatonWhitenonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Beley v. NaphtalyPeckhamnonenone9th Cir.affirmed
Smith v. NaphtalyPeckhamnonenone9th Cir.affirmed
Holden v. HardyBrownnonenoneUtahaffirmed
Smithsonian Inst. v. MeechBrewernonenoneD.C. Cir.reversed
Brown v. Marion Nat'l BankHarlannonenoneKy.reversed
Savings & L. Soc'y v. Multnomah Cnty.GraynonenoneC.C.D. Or.affirmed
Central Nat'l Bank v. StevensShirasnonenoneN.Y.reversed
Smyth v. AmesHarlannonenoneC.C.D. Neb.affirmed
Merritt v. Bowdoin Coll.HarlannonenoneC.C.N.D. Cal.dismissed
Backus v. Fort St. U.D. Co.BrewernoneHarlanMich.affirmed
Wilson v. North CarolinaPeckhamnonenoneN.C.dismissed
United States ex rel. Bernardin v. ButterworthShirasnonenoneD.C. Cir.reversed
McCormick H.M. Co. v. Aultman Co.Brownnonenone6th Cir.certification
Missouri et al. Ry. Co. v. HaberHarlannoneBrewerKan.affirmed
Louisville & N.R.R. Co. v. BehlmerFullernonenone4th Cir.vacation denied
United States v. Wong Kim ArkGraynoneFullerC.C.N.D. Cal.affirmed