Betwa River
History
In Sanskrit, "Betwa" is Vetravati. This river is mentioned in the epic Mahabharata along with the Charmanwati river. Both are The tributaries of Yamuna. Vetravati was also known as Shuktimati. The capital of the Chedi Kingdom was on the banks of this river. The length of the river from its origin to its confluence with Yamuna is, out of which lies in Madhya Pradesh and the balance of in Uttar Pradesh. By an interstate agreement between the states of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh in 1973, the Betwa River Board was constituted under the Betwa River Board Act, 1976. The Union Minister of the Ministry of Water Resources, the Chairman of the Board, the Union Minister of Power, the Union Minister of State for Water Resources, and the chief ministers and ministers in charge of finance, irrigation, and power in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh are its members.Ken-Betwa project
The Ken-Betwa River Linking Project is a large-scale interlinking initiative aimed at transferring surplus water from the Ken River in Madhya Pradesh to the Betwa River in Uttar Pradesh. The project involves the construction of the Daudhan Dam, a 2.5 km canal, and other infrastructure. The government asserts that the project will help irrigate in drought-stricken Bundelkhand, provide drinking water to 6.2 million people, and generate 130 MW of hydropower and solar energy once completed in 2030. The estimated cost of the project is ₹440 billion.Environmental Concerns
The project has been the subject of environmental criticism, particularly regarding its impact on the Panna Tiger Reserve. Environmentalists warn that the project will submerge nearly 98 sq km of the 543 sq km sanctuary, threatening tiger conservation efforts that successfully reintroduced the species after local extinction in 2009. Concerns have also been raised about the impact on vultures, whose nesting sites may be disturbed by the dam’s construction.A 2019 expert panel appointed by the Supreme Court of India questioned the project’s economic feasibility and environmental impact, recommending alternative irrigation methods. A 2023 study suggested that river-linking projects could worsen water stress rather than alleviate it. Critics also argue that the government has based its water availability estimates on outdated 2003 data without independent verification.
Government officials defend the project, stating that it has received all necessary environmental clearances and that additional land has been allocated to offset the loss of tiger habitats.