Stratopedarches
Stratopedarchēs, sometimes Anglicized as Stratopedarch, was a Greek term used with regard to high-ranking military commanders from the 1st century BC on, becoming a proper office in the 10th-century Byzantine Empire. It continued to be employed as a designation, and a proper title, of commanders-in-chief until the 13th century, when the title of or Grand Stratopedarch appeared. This title was awarded to senior commanders and officials, while the ordinary stratopedarchai were henceforth low-ranking military officials.
History
Origin and early use
The term first appears in the late 1st century BC in the Hellenistic Near East. Its origin is unclear, but it is used as a translation, in some inscriptions, for the contemporary Roman legionary post of praefectus castrorum. Josephus uses the term to refer to the quartermaster-general of all camps, while Dionysius of Halicarnassus used it to refer to the role of a primus pilus in a legion that had lost its commander. It also occurs in the Bible, where it has been interpreted as referring to the praetorian prefect, the commander of the camp and garrison of the Praetorian Guard in Rome, or the subordinate officials praefectus peregrinorum and princeps castrorum.From the 1st century AD, it was used in a broader sense as a literary term to refer to generals, i.e. as a synonym of the older title. Thus in the 4th century, the bishop and historian Eusebius writes of the ", whom the Romans call dux". Similarly, in the early 5th century, Ardabur was called " of both forces" by Olympiodorus of Thebes, while the acts of the Council of Chalcedon refer to Zeno, " and of both forces of the East". This is an obvious translation of the Latin term magister utriusque militiae, especially as the contemporary historian Eunapius records that the was "the greatest of offices". Other Greek-language authors translate Ardabur's title more commonly with or. The Swiss historian Albert Vogt suggested that the were military intendants, responsible for army supplies and managing the fortified assembly bases, the.
However, as the Byzantinist Rodolphe Guilland commented, references to a are rare before the 10th century, and always seem to be a different way of referring—often anachronistically—to a magister militum, or later a thematic. Such references exist to emperor Jovian, who was a general before his rise to the throne, by Theophanes the Confessor; Rusticius, a general of Leo I, by Zonaras; Busur, an Arab commander in, by Theophanes; Krateros, a " of the East" who was sent to arrest Theodore Stoudites; Eudokimos, / of Cappadocia and Charsianon under Theophilos ; and a certain Mousilikes, subordinate of the thematic of Sicily. A Constantine, whose seal mentions him as a, cannot be further identified.
Middle Byzantine period
In the middle Byzantine period, the term came to signify more the army on campaign, rather than the camp itself; hence the term was used more in the sense of 'commander-in-chief'. The title is first attested as a technical term in 967, when Emperor Nikephoros II Phokas named the eunuch Peter as before sending him with an army to Cilicia. The Escorial Taktikon, written a few years later, shows the existence of two, one of the East and one of the West. This arrangement parallels that of the two, a fact that led Nicolas Oikonomides to suggest that the post was created as a substitute of the latter office, which was barred to eunuchs until the 11th century.The actual nature of the office is difficult to reconstruct, as it is rarely found in technical sources like the Byzantine military and court manuals, and its usage in the historical accounts is simply as another word for a high commander, in place of or . Thus it is unclear what position the occupied vis-à-vis the, or why some officers received the former rather than the latter title. The precise arrangement suggested by Oikonomides is certainly not in evidence in the 11th and 12th centuries, when the term likely signified a commander-in-chief for a field army composed of professional regiments, rather than an institutionalized position.
Late Byzantine period
The title was instituted by the Emperor Theodore II Laskaris for his chief minister and confidante, George Mouzalon. Theodore II states in a decree that he "established the dignity anew", but no other holder of the office is known before that time. The mid-14th century Book of Offices of pseudo-Kodinos places the as the ninth-most senior official of the state below the Emperor, ranking between the and the. Kodinos reports that he was "supervisor of the provisioning of the army, that is food, drink and all necessities". In reality, however, during the Palaiologan period the was most likely an honorific court title, and did not necessarily entail an active military command. Like many other titles in the Palaiologan period, the post could be held by two people simultaneously. According to Pseudo-Kodinos, the ceremonial costume of the was identical to the offices immediately superior to it: a rich silk tunic, a golden-red hat decorated with embroideries in the style, without veil, or a domed hat, again in red and gold and decorated with golden wire, with a portrait of the emperor standing in front, and another of him enthroned in the rear. Only his staff of office differed, with all the knobs except the topmost in silver, and golden engraved knots.Pseudo-Kodinos further reports the existence of four subordinate, occupying the 65th to 68th rank in the imperial hierarchy respectively. These were:
- The of the . Kodinos explains that cavalry used to be raised in the themes according to the wealth of its owners, with the classes being,, and after the number of horses each rider provided; a system similar to that current in Western Europe at the time.
- The of the .
- The of the . According to Kodinos these were palace guards armed with the bow. Their name is commonly held to derive from the Arabo-Turkish word murted/''murtat'', implying they were Christianized Turks, but according to Mark Bartusis may refer more generally to the offspring of mixed Greek–Turkish unions.
- The of the . The or had served as marines since Michael VIII Palaiologos. According to Kodinos, some served as palace guards, equipped with maces and wearing with a distinctive blue cuirass that bore two white lions facing each other on the chest, but the supervised those who were employed as garrison troops in various fortresses.
The semi-autonomous Despotate of the Morea appears to have had a and subordinate of its own.