Semivowel


In phonetics and phonology, a semivowel, glide or semiconsonant is a sound that is phonetically similar to a vowel sound but functions as the syllable boundary, rather than as the nucleus of a syllable. Examples of semivowels in English are y and w in yes and west, respectively. Written in IPA, y and w are near to the vowels ee and oo in seen and moon, written in IPA. The term glide may alternatively refer to any type of transitional sound, not necessarily a semivowel.

Classification

Semivowels form a subclass of approximants. Although "semivowel" and "approximant" are sometimes treated as synonymous, most authors use the term "semivowel" for a more restricted set; there is no universally agreed-upon definition, and the exact details may vary from author to author. For example, do not consider the labiodental approximant to be a semivowel.
In the International Phonetic Alphabet, the diacritic attached to non-syllabic vowel letters is an inverted breve placed below the symbol representing the vowel:. When there is no room for the inverted breve under a symbol, it may be written above, using. Before 1989, non-syllabicity was represented by, which now stands for extra-shortness.
Additionally, there are dedicated symbols for four semivowels that correspond to the four close cardinal vowel sounds:
Semivowel Vowel

Some authors argue for the recognition of additional semivowels:
  • The rhotic approximants and, considered to be semivowels corresponding to r-colored vowels such as or.
  • The pharyngeal approximant, considered to be the semivowel corresponding to the open back vowel, which is noted to have distinct pharyngeal features in its articulation.
  • The post-palatal approximants, or central semivowels, which may be written as , , or the para-IPA symbols, considered to be corresponding to the unrounded, compressed, and protruded close central vowels, respectively.

    Contrast with vowels

Semivowels, by definition, contrast with vowels by being non-syllabic. In addition, they are usually shorter than vowels. In languages such as Amharic, Yoruba, and Zuni, semivowels are produced with a narrower constriction in the vocal tract than their corresponding vowels. Nevertheless, semivowels may be phonemically equivalent with vowels. For example, the English word fly can be considered either as an open syllable ending in a diphthong or as a closed syllable ending in a consonant.
It is unusual for a language to contrast a semivowel and a diphthong containing an equivalent vowel, but Romanian contrasts the diphthong with, a perceptually similar approximant-vowel sequence. The diphthong is analyzed as a single segment, and the approximant-vowel sequence is analyzed as two separate segments.
In addition to phonological justifications for the distinction, there are phonetic differences between the pair:
  • has a greater duration than
  • The transition between the two elements is longer and faster for than with the former having a higher F2 onset.
Although a phonological parallel exists between and, the production and perception of phonetic contrasts between the two is much weaker, likely because of lower lexical load for, which is limited largely to loanwords from French, and speakers' difficulty in maintaining contrasts between two back rounded semivowels in comparison to front ones.

Contrast with fricatives/spirant approximants

According to the standard definitions, semivowels contrast with fricatives in that fricatives produce turbulence, but semivowels do not. In discussing Spanish, Martínez Celdrán suggests setting up a third category of "spirant approximant", contrasting both with semivowel approximants and with fricatives. Though the spirant approximant is more constricted, longer, and unspecified for rounding, the distributional overlap is limited. The spirant approximant can only appear in the syllable onset. The two overlap in distribution after and : enyesar vs. aniego , and although there is dialectal and idiolectal variation, speakers may also exhibit other near-minimal pairs like abyecto vs. abierto . One potential minimal pair is ya visto vs. y ha visto .
Again, it is not present in all dialects. Other dialects differ in either merging the two or enhancing the contrast by moving the former to another place of articulation, like in Rioplatense Spanish.