Rules of Decision Act
The Rules of Decision Act mandates the application of substantive state law in cases heard in U.S. federal courts sitting in diversity, except where state law is preempted by federal law. The U.S. Supreme Court in Swift v. Tyson originally read this Act of Congress as limited to state statutory law, but later overturned Swift in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins and instead held that the Rules of Decision Act requires the application of state law including case law originating from state courts.
The Act originated as Section 34 of the Judiciary Act of 1789. It is now codified, in slightly different form, in, as follows:
The interpretation of this language, especially the meaning of the phrase "the laws of the several states", was the central issue in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins.