Radon–Nikodym set
In the theory of fair cake-cutting, the Radon–Nikodym set is a geometric object that represents a cake, based on how different people evaluate the different parts of the cake.
Example
Suppose we have a cake made of four parts. There are two people, Alice and George, with different tastes: each person values the different parts of the cake differently. The table below describes the parts and their values; the last row, "RNS Point", is explained afterwards.| Chocolate | Lemon | Vanilla | Cherries | |
| Alice's value | 18 | 9 | 1 | 2 |
| George's value | 18 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| - | - | - | - | |
| RNS point |
The "RNS point" of a piece of cake describes the relative values of the partners to that piece. It has two coordinates – one for Alice and one for George. For example:
- The partners agree on the values for the chocolate part, so the coordinates of its RNS point are also equal.
- The lemon part is only valuable for Alice, so in its RNS point, only Alice's coordinate is 1 while George's coordinate is 0.
- In both the vanilla and the cherries part, the ratio between Alice's value to George's value is 1:4. Hence, this is also the ratio between the coordinates of their RNS points. Note that both the vanilla and the cherries are mapped to the same RNS point.
| Lemon | – | – | – | – | Chocolate | – | – | Vanilla, Cherries | – | – |
In effect, the cake is decomposed and re-constructed on the segment -.
Definitions
There is a set, and a set which is a sigma-algebra of subsets of.There are partners. Every partner has a personal value measure. This measure determines how much each subset of is worth to that partner.
Define the following measure:
Note that each is an absolutely continuous measure with respect to. Therefore, by the Radon–Nikodym theorem, it has a Radon–Nikodym derivative, which is a function such that for every measurable subset :
The are called value-density functions. They have the following properties, for almost all points of the cake :
For every point, the RNS point of is defined by:
Note that is always a point in the -dimensional unit simplex in, denoted by .
The RNS of a cake is the set of all its RNS points:
The cake is decomposed and then re-constructed inside. Each vertex of is associated with one of the n partners. Each fraction of the cake is mapped to a point in according to the valuations: the more valuable a piece is to a partner, the closer it is to that partner's vertex. This is shown in the above example for partners and ). Akin describes the meaning of the RNS for partners:
Efficient RNS partitions
The unit simplex can be partitioned among the partners, giving each partner a subset. Each such partition induces a partition of the cake, in which partner receives the bits of whose RNS-points fall within.Here are two example partitions for the [|two-partner example], where is the segment between and
- Cut in the point. Give the segment - to Alice and the segment - to George. This corresponds to giving the Lemon and Chocolate to Alice and the rest to George.
- Cut in the same point, but give the segment - to George and the segment - to Alice.
For every point :
- Say that a partition of belongs to , if:
- Say that a partition of belongs to, if it is induced by a partition of that belongs to. I.e:
Since every Pareto-efficient division is weighetd-utilitarian-maximal for some selection of weights, the following theorem is also true:
So there is a mapping between the set of Pareto-efficient partitions and the points in.
Returning to the above example:
- The first partition belongs to the point, as well as to other points such as . Indeed, it is a utilitarian cake-cutting that maximizes the sum, and it is also Pareto-efficient.
- In contrast, the second partition does not belong to any point, and indeed it is not Pareto-efficient.
- There are some points to which many different partitions belong. For example, the point. This is a point of the RNS and there is a positive mass of cake associated with it, so any partition of that mass leads to a partition that belongs to. For example, giving the Lemon and Chocolate to Alice and the rest to George belongs to ; giving only the Lemon to Alice and the rest to George also belongs to it; giving the Lemon and half the chocolate to Alice and the rest to George also belongs to it; etc. All these partitions maximize the sum ; indeed, this sum is 78 in all these partitions. They are all Pareto-efficient.