Preterintention
Preterintention is a feature of criminal law in several legal traditions that describes a situation wherein a criminal perpetrator intends to commit a crime, but unintentionally commits a crime of greater severity than the one they originally intended. For example, an unintentional homicide committed during an attempted robbery.
The concept occurs in various European and Latin American legal systems, including Belgium, Brazil, Ecuador, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, but the term is obsolete in English.
History
The concept of preterintention has roots in Roman law, and was also known in the Middle Ages.By country
Belgium
In Belgian law, every criminal offense has a "moral element" or type of intent, which affects the level of criminal responsibility that can be imputed to the perpetrator. The moral element is subdivided into four types: general intent, specific intent, negligence with or without premeditation, and a fourth type, known as preterintentional offenses.Preterintentional offenses have combined elements of both dol and faute. The classic example is in article 401 of the Belgian criminal code:
When blows or injuries are inflicted intentionally, but without the intention of causing death, and nevertheless result in death, the guilty party shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of five to ten years.
Belgium has a unique case of preterintentional offense regarding pharmaceuticals or other potentially toxic substances in article 402 of the code. This article lays out specific criminal penalties for anyone who, without intending to kill, intentionally injects or administers any medication or substance that is potentially lethal or could have serious consequences to health, and without intending to, ends up causing the recipient to become sick or incapacitated and unable to work.
Brazil
In the Brazilian criminal justice system, the term dolo refers to a "guilty mind", the mental state or subjective intent of a perpetrator in committing a criminal offense; that is, the resolve to violate the law, by action or omission, with full knowledge of the criminality of what is being done.Three levels of intent with respect to a crime and its outcome are recognized. In direct intent, the perpetrator intends to carry out a crime and the result is exactly as expected. In indirect intent, the perpetrator may not plan or intend a criminal outcome, but acts with the understanding that it is a possibility and accepts the risk of it turning out that way. The third type is preterdolo—less often termed preterintenção —in which the perpetrator acts intentionally in a way to knowingly produce a criminal result, but the outcome turns out to be a more serious crime than what they had intended.