Practical arguments
Practical arguments are a logical structure used to determine the validity or dependencies of a claim made in natural-language arguments.
Overview...
An argument can be thought of as two or more contradicting tree structures.- The root of each tree is a claim: a belief supported by information.
- The root branches out to nodes that are grounds: supporting information.
- The edges connecting them are warrants: rules or principles.
- Claims, grounds and warrants are often not known for certain, so they are presented with a qualifier to indicate their probability.
- When a ground is disputable it is a sub claim; in this way the tree can grow to be quite large.
Example 1
- Claim: Cats are less intelligent than dogs.
- Ground: Cats cannot learn to do tricks as well as dogs do.
- Warrant: The ability to learn tricks is a mark of intelligence.
Example 2
[Image:Practical_argument_tree.svg|400px|right|thumb|Practical argument tree]- C: Humans can't fly.
- *Q: In a gravity field without assistance or modification
- *W1: Because it defies the laws of Newtonian physics it can not be done.
- **Q: Fact
- *G1: It defies the laws of Newtonian physics.
- **Q: Disputable fact
- *W1.1: Because Newtonian physics applies it would defy the laws of Newtonian physics.
- **Q: Fact
- *G1.1: Newtonian physics apply to all super quantum systems including people
- **Q: Fact
- *W1.2: Because there is no print record it is highly improbable.
- **Q: Highly improbable
- *G1.2: There is no print record of any reputable person claiming such a thing.
- **Q: Fact
- *W2: Because no one has ever flown, it is highly improbable.
- **Q: Highly improbable
- *G2: No one has ever flown.
- **Q: Disputable fact
- *W2.1: Because there is no print record it is highly improbable.
- **Q: Highly improbable
- *G2.1: There is no print record of any reputable person claiming such a thing.
- **Q: Fact