Poncelet's closure theorem


[Image:PonceletPorism.gif|thumb|right|Illustration of Poncelet's porism for n = 3, a triangle that is inscribed in one circle and circumscribes another.]
In geometry, Poncelet's closure theorem, also known as Poncelet's porism, states that whenever a polygon is inscribed in one conic section and circumscribes another one, the polygon must be part of an infinite family of polygons that are all inscribed in and circumscribe the same two conics. It is named after French engineer and mathematician Jean-Victor Poncelet, who wrote about it in 1822; however, the triangular case was discovered significantly earlier, in 1746 by William Chapple.
Poncelet's porism can be proved by an argument using an elliptic curve, whose points represent a combination of a line tangent to one conic and a crossing point of that line with the other conic.

Statement

Let C and D be two plane conics. If it is possible to find, for a given n > 2, one n-sided polygon that is simultaneously inscribed in C and circumscribed around D, then it is possible to find infinitely many of them. Each point of C or D is a vertex or tangency of one such polygon.
If the conics are circles, the polygons that are inscribed in one circle and circumscribed about the other are called bicentric polygons, so this special case of Poncelet's porism can be expressed more concisely by saying that every bicentric polygon is part of an infinite family of bicentric polygons with respect to the same two circles.

Proof sketch

View C and D as curves in the complex projective plane P2. For simplicity, assume that C and D meet transversely. Then by Bézout's theorem, the intersection C ∩ D of the two curves consists of four complex points. For an arbitrary point d in D, let ℓd be the tangent line to D at d. Let X be the subvariety of C × D consisting of such that ℓd passes through c. Given c, the number of d with ∈ X is 1 if c ∈ C ∩ D and 2 otherwise. Thus the projection X → C ≃ P1 presents X as a degree 2 cover ramified above 4 points, so X is an elliptic curve. Let be the involution of X sending a general to the other point with the same first coordinate. Any involution of an elliptic curve with a fixed point, when expressed in the group law, has the form x → p − x for some p, so has this form. Similarly, the projection X → D is a degree 2 morphism ramified over the contact points on D of the four lines tangent to both C and D, and the corresponding involution has the form x → q − x for some q. Thus the composition is a translation on X. If a power of has a fixed point, that power must be the identity. Translated back into the language of C and D, this means that if one point c ∈ C gives rise to an orbit that closes up, then so does every point. The degenerate cases in which C and D are not transverse follow from a limit argument.