Osarseph
Osarseph or Osarsiph is a legendary figure of Ancient Egypt who has been equated with Moses. According to 1st century AD Jewish historian Josephus, the story of Osarseph was recounted by the Ptolemaic Egyptian historian Manetho in his Aegyptiaca ; Manetho's work is lost, but Josephus relates extensively from what he claims are epitomes of the original.
According to Josephus’s quotation of Manetho, Osarseph was an Ancient Egyptian priest from Heliopolis who led a revolt of people described as lepers and “unclean” against a pharaoh named Amenophis. The rebels allied themselves with the expelled Hyksos, who, according to Josephus, returned from the region later associated with Jerusalem in his narrative, to join them in despoiling Egypt, before being expelled once more when Amenophis regained power. Toward the end of the story, Osarseph is said to have changed his name to Moses.
Later chronographers such as Africanus and Eusebius, attempting to align Manetho's narrative with known Egyptian dynasties, identified this Amenophis as a king “between two Ramesses”, sometimes calling him Seti or the “son of Ramses”.
These identifications are not supported by Egyptian chronology: the Hyksos, the Amenhotep kings, and the Ramessides belong to distinct, non-overlapping periods. Modern Egyptology therefore treats Manetho's narrative as a composite legend rather than a literal historical record.
Some later interpretations of Josephus's account suggest that the Hyksos established settlements in the Levant, including the city later called Jerusalem, though this is considered legendary and not supported by archaeology.
Much debated is the question of what, if any, historical reality might lie behind the Osarseph story. An influential study by Egyptologist Jan Assmann has suggested that no single historical incident or person lies behind the legend, and that it represents instead a conflation of several historical traumas, notably the religious reforms of Akhenaten.
Story
The story of Osarseph is known from two long quotations from the Aegyptiaca, a history of Egypt by the Egyptian historian Manetho, in Josephus's Against Apion. The first is Manetho's account of the expulsion of the Hyksos and their settlement in Judea, where they found the city of Jerusalem. Josephus then draws the conclusion that Manetho's Hyksos were the Israelites of the Exodus, although Manetho himself makes no such connection.The second story is of Osarseph, set some two hundred years later. According to Josephus, Manetho described Osarseph as a tyrannical Egyptian high priest of Osiris at Heliopolis. Pharaoh Amenophis had a desire to see the gods, but in order to do so he first had to cleanse Egypt of lepers and other polluted people, setting 80,000 of them to work in the stone quarries, and then confining them to Avaris, the former Hyksos capital in the Eastern Delta. There, Osarseph became their leader and ordered them to abandon worship of the gods and eat the meat of the holy animals. The Osarsephites then invited the Hyksos back into Egypt, and together with their new allies drove Amenophis and his son Ramses into exile in Nubia and instituted a 13-year reign of religious oppression: towns and temples were devastated, the images of the gods destroyed, and sanctuaries turned into kitchens where sacred animals were roasted over fires. Eventually, Amenophis and Rameses returned to expel the lepers and the Hyksos, and restore the old Egyptian religion. Towards the end of the story, Manetho reports Osarseph took the name "Moses".
Interpretations
Three interpretations have been proposed for the story: the first, as a memory of the Amarna period; the second, as a memory of the Hyksos; and the third, as anti-Jewish propaganda. Each explanation has evidence to support it: the name of the pharaoh, Amenophis, and the religious character of the conflict fit the Amarna reform of Egyptian religion; the name of Avaris and possibly the name Osarseph fit the Hyksos period, and the overall plot is an apparent inversion of the Jewish story of the Exodus which now casts the Israelites in a bad light. No one theory, however, can explain all the elements. An influential proposition by Egyptologist Jan Assmann suggests that the story has no single origin but rather combines numerous historical experiences, notably the Amarna and Hyksos periods, into a folk memory.An alternative theory identifies Osarseph with the historical figure of Chancellor Bay, a prominent Syrian officer who rose to power during the reign of Pharaoh Seti II and later attempted to usurp the throne, only to be arrested and executed by order of Pharaoh Siptah. However, such identification is usually rejected by scholars.
Israel Knohl recently proposed to identify Osarseph with Irsu, a Shasu who, according to Papyrus Harris I and the Elephantine Stele, took power in Egypt with the support of "Asiatics" after the death of Queen Twosret; after coming to power, Irsu and his supporters disrupted Egyptian rituals, "treating the gods like the people" and halting offerings to the Egyptian deities. They were eventually defeated and expelled by the new Pharaoh Setnakhte and, while fleeing, they abandoned large quantities of gold and silver they had stolen from the temples.
It is possible that the Osarseph story, or at least the point at which Osarseph changes his name to Moses, is an alteration to Manetho's original history made in the 1st century BC when anti-Jewish sentiment was running high in Egypt, since without this Manetho's history has no mention of the Jews at all. If the story is an original part of Manetho's history of Egypt, the question arises of where he could have heard it, as the Greek Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Torah had not been made when he was writing. It is possible that he had an oral informant, or possibly an otherwise unknown pre-Septuagint translation. In accordance with this, Manetho, indeed, stated that Amenophis was the son of Ramses and the father of Ramses, whose original name was Sethos.