Internet relationship
An internet relationship is a relationship between people who have met online, and in many cases know each other only via the Internet. Online relationships are similar in many ways to pen pal relationships. This relationship can be romantic, platonic, or based on business affairs. An internet relationship is generally sustained for a certain amount of time before being titled a relationship, just as in-person relationships. The major difference here is that an internet relationship is sustained via computer or online service, and the individuals in the relationship may or may not ever meet each other in person. Otherwise, the term is quite broad and can include relationships based upon text, video, audio, or even virtual character. This relationship can be between people in different regions, different countries, different sides of the world, or even people who reside in the same area but do not communicate in person. This is often facilitated via online spaces, like chatrooms and direct messages.
Technological advances
According to J. Michael Jaffe, author of Gender, Pseudonyms, and CMC: Masking Identities and Baring Souls, "the Internet was originally established to expedite communication between governmental scientists and defense experts, and was not at all intended to be the popular 'interpersonal mass medium' it has become", yet new and revolutionary devices enabling the mass public to communicate online are constantly being developed and released.Rather than having many devices for different uses and ways of interacting, communicating online is more accessible and cheaper by having an Internet function built into one device, such as mobile phones, tablets, laptops, and smartphones. Other ways of communicating online with these devices are via services and applications such as Email, Videotelephony, instant messages, social networking services, asynchronous discussion groups or virtual worlds.
Some of these ways of communicating online are asynchronous, such as YouTube and some are synchronous, such as Twitter. Synchronous communication occurs when two or more participants are interacting in real time via voice or text chat.
Digital boundaries and online relationship conflict
Internet-based relationships—those that begin or are primarily maintained through digital communication—have become increasingly common, making digital boundaries and online conflict key topics of research. Because most interactions occur through messaging apps, social media platforms, or other online tools, partners must negotiate how frequently they communicate, which platforms they prefer, and how available they expect one another to be. Interpreting digital cues such as response timing, read receipts, and written tone also plays a major role in shaping trust, emotional closeness, and overall satisfaction.Differences in communication expectations can easily create tension. One partner may want quick replies or daily video calls, while the other prefers slower, less frequent contact. The lack of nonverbal cues—such as facial expressions or vocal tone—can make misunderstandings more likely and allow minor issues to escalate more quickly.
Social media behavior is another frequent source of conflict. Partners may disagree about posting their relationship online, interacting with others on social platforms, sharing private content, or deciding how visible their relationship should be. Actions such as liking posts, commenting, or replying late can be interpreted differently depending on each partner’s expectations. These issues tend to be especially significant in long-distance or online-first relationships, where social media often functions as a key source of reassurance and emotional visibility.
Role of cultural, personal, and contextual differences
Cultural differences
Cultural norms play a major role in shaping how individuals manage digital boundaries. Expectations related to privacy, emotional expression, and online openness differ widely across cultures. In collectivist societies, frequent communication may be seen as a sign of care and loyalty, whereas in individualistic cultures the same behavior may be viewed as intrusive or overbearing. Understanding these cultural differences can reduce misinterpretation in cross-cultural online relationships.Personal differences
Differences in personality, emotional needs, and past experiences also influence digital boundary preferences. Individuals who value independence may prefer limited or selective communication, while those seeking emotional closeness may desire frequent contact or reassurance. When these preferences do not align, misunderstandings or emotional strain may occur. Clear communication about response expectations and personal boundaries can help maintain trust and stability.Contextual differences
The context of a relationship—such as long-distance arrangements, time-zone differences, or work schedules—can further influence communication patterns. Long-distance partners often rely heavily on digital tools to remain emotionally connected, making online presence and response timing particularly meaningful. Additionally, norms vary across platforms: public posts may signal commitment, whereas private messages may carry more intimate meaning.Impact on emotional well-being and relationship satisfaction
Research shows that couples who openly negotiate their digital boundaries tend to experience fewer misunderstandings and lower levels of jealousy. Conversely, unclear or repeatedly disregarded boundaries can contribute to feelings of anxiety, mistrust, and emotional exhaustion.Although digital communication can strengthen social support networks, it does not always replicate the emotional benefits of face-to-face interactions. A Canadian study found that in-person friendships were more strongly associated with subjective well-being than the size of one’s online network.
Studies on adolescents similarly indicate that high-quality friendships—whether online or offline—support emotional health. However, excessive social media use may be associated with internalizing symptoms such as anxiety or sadness, suggesting that the quality of interactions is more important than quantity.
Digital literacy and respectful online communication
Digital literacy and respectful communication are increasingly important as technology shapes online relationships. This includes awareness of one’s online habits, understanding emotional needs, and clearly communicating expectations. Respecting each other’s digital boundaries can prevent misunderstandings, reduce conflict, and strengthen trust in internet-mediated relationships.Types of relationships
Many types of internet relationships are possible in today's world of technology.Internet dating
Internet dating is very relevant in the lives of many individuals worldwide. A major benefit in the rise of Internet dating is the decrease in prostitution. People no longer need to search on the streets to find casual relationships. They can find them online if that is what they desire. Internet dating websites offer matchmaking services for people to find love or whatever else they may be looking for. The creation of the internet and its progressive innovations have opened up doors for people to meet other people who they may very well have never met otherwise.Dating website innovations
Although the availability of uploading videos to the internet is not a new innovation, it has been made easier since 2008 thanks to YouTube. YouTube began the surge of video streaming sites in 2005 and within three years, smaller web developers started implementing video sharing on their sites. Internet dating sites have benefitted greatly since the surge in easiness and accessibility of picture and video uploading. Videos and pictures are equally important for most personal profiles. These profiles can be found on sites used for interpersonal relationships other than dating as well. "The body, although graphically absent, does not have to be any less present." Older and less advanced sites usually still allow, and often require, each user to upload a picture. Newer and more advanced sites offer the possibility of streaming media live via the user's profile for the site. The inclusion of videos and pictures has become almost a necessity for sexual social networking sites to maintain the loyalty of their members. It is appealing to internet users to be able to view and share videos, especially when forming relationships or friendships.Other technological innovations, like app and computer-related means of accessibility, have contributed to the rapid popularity of online dating. Both computer and app-based mediums facilitate interactions with other users to fulfill their personal motivations for casual dating, long-term commitments, and entertainment. Yet, the portability of apps, such as Tinder, allow easy and instantaneous access to making potential matches. Additionally, dating apps utilize location-based features, predominantly through the usage of smart phones and other devices. As a result, it is estimated that more than 384.15 million people worldwide currently use dating apps, and that number is expected by researchers to increase.
Users
According to an article in the New York Times, mediated matchmaking has been around since the mid-1800s. Online dating was made available in the mid-1990s, with the creation of the first dating sites. These dating sites create a space for liberation of sexuality. According to Sam Yagan of OkCupid, "the period between New Year's Day and Valentine's Day is busiest six weeks of the year". Changes that online dating companies have created include not only the increase of pickiness in singles, but the rise in interracial marriages and spread the acceptance of homosexual individuals. Dating sites "are a place where sexual minorities, inter-sexed people and gay people are enjoying a newly found freedom". Several studies have shown the availability of online dating to produce a greater closeness and intimacy between individuals because it circumvents barriers that face-to-face interactions might have. "Participating in personal relationships online allow for almost full freedom from power relations in the offline/real world."A plethora of virtual sexual identities are represented in online profiles. The amount of personal information users are being asked to provide is constantly increasing. More and more online users are starting to explore and experiment with aspects of their sexual identities, whereas before, they may have felt uncomfortable due to social constraints or fear of possible repercussions. Most internet sites containing personal profiles require individuals to fill in "personal information" sections. Often these sections include a series of multiple choice questions. Due to the anonymity of these virtual profiles, individuals are more frequent to 'role'-play at being one of the predefined 'types', although offline, reservations may inhibit the individual from sharing true answers.
There have also been many studies done to observe online daters and their reason for turning to the internet to look for romantic partners. According to Robert J. Brym and Rhonda L. Lenton, users of online games, websites, and other virtual communities are encouraged to conceal their identities and learn things about themselves that they never knew before. With a concealed identity, an online user can be whoever they want to be at that exact moment. They have the ability to venture outside of their comfort zone and act as someone completely different.
The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication reports the results of a study conducted by Robert J. Stephure, Susan D. Boon, Stacy L. MacKinnon, and Vicki L. Deveau on types of relationships online participants were seeking. They concluded that "when asked what they were looking for in an online relationship, the considerable majority of participants expressed interest in seeking fun, companionship, and someone to talk to. Most also reported interests in developing casual friendships and dating relationships with online partners. Substantially fewer reported using the Internet for the specific purposes of identifying potential sexual or marital partners." This aligns with the socioemotional selectivity theory, where a changing perception of time influences an individual’s perception of their own social goals. Young adults make up a significant portion of online dating sites’ user base, and for them, time and how their time is spent is less of a priority in forming new relationships, as opposed to older demographics who are more aware of their emotional goals and perception of time. Therefore, research suggests that casual, fun-seeking relationships are more common.
However, a study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2012, looked at about 19,000 married people and those who met their spouse online said their marriage was more satisfying than those who met their spouse offline. Plus, marriages that began online were less likely to end in separation or divorce.
Faye Mishna, Alan McLuckie, and Michael Saini, co-authors of the Social Work Research article Real-World Dangers in an Online Reality: A Qualitative Study Examining Online Relationships and Cyber Abuse, reported the results of their research and observation of over 35,000 individuals between the ages of 6 and 24 who have been or currently are a part of an internet relationship about which they had concerns, and consequently contacted an organization that provided online support. Of the final 346 posts chosen to be included in the study, the average age of online users sharing information about their online relationship was 14 years old. The overwhelming result was that children and youth consider their online relationships to be just as "real" as their offline relationships. The study also showed that the internet plays a crucial role in sexual and romantic experiences of this population of adolescent users.