Mapusaurus

Mapusaurus is a genus of giant carcharodontosaurid carnosaurian dinosaur that lived in Argentina during the Cenomanian–Turonian ages of the Late Cretaceous. It is known from a bonebed of between seven and nine specimens, excavated from the strata of the Huincul Formation between 1997 and 2001 as part of the Argentinian-Canadian Dinosaur Project. In 2006, Rodolfo Coria and Philip J. Currie scientifically described Mapusaurus. Only one species of Mapusaurus, M. roseae, has been described, named after the rose-colored rocks in which it was discovered and sponsor Rose Letwin.
Mapusaurus was one of the largest carcharodontosaurids. Based on the biggest specimen known from the bonebed, represented by a left femur, it was originally estimated to have reached a maximum body length of and a mass of. Subsequent works have given maximum size estimates of and respectively. Mapusaurus generally resembled Giganotosaurus, though had a deeper skull, a more rugose maxilla, a rougher surface to its lacrimal bone, differently proportioned neck vertebrae, and various other minor differences. The arms of Mapusaurus were very small, similar in terms of proportional size to those of tyrannosaurids and abelisaurids.

Discovery and naming

The first fossils of this taxon were discovered in 1995 by members of the Argentinian-Canadian Dinosaur Project in an exposure of the Huincul Formation at Cañadón del Gato, a site south of Plaza Huincul in Neuquén Province, Argentina. In 1997, crews from the Project began excavating the fossils, which they believed to belong to a single skeleton of a large theropod dinosaur. However, during preparation of the remains it was realized that they came from several individuals of differing sizes and ontogenetic stages. That same year, Argentine paleontologist Rodolfo Coria and Canadian paleontologist Philip Currie, the leaders of the Project, announced the discovery of the theropod at a meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, stating that the team had unearthed a single skeleton of a new carcharodontosaurid theropod similar to Giganotosaurus. By that time, an isolated tooth, a, a vertebra, a manual, an incomplete pelvis, femora, tibiae, a fibula, a metatarsal, and several pedal phalanges had been collected, however later digs would find more fossils. Excavations of the fossils at Cañadón del Gato lasted from 1997 to 2001, wherein hundreds of fossils from at least seven to nine individuals of Mapusaurus were discovered. These fossils were mentioned in conference abstracts in 2000 and 2001, which noted the possibility of pack behavior or gregariousness in large theropods based on the quantity and age range of the theropod fossils found.
In 2006, Coria and Currie scientifically described the remains, and identified them as belonging to a new genus and species of giant carcharodontosaurid theropod. Based on this material, they named them Mapusaurus roseae. The generic name Mapusaurus derives from the Mapuche word Mapu, meaning "Earth", and the Greek σαῦρος, meaning "lizard", and thus "Earth lizard". The specific name roseae is named for both the rose-colored rocks, in which the fossils were found and for Rose Letwin, who sponsored the expeditions which recovered these fossils. Coria and Currie designated an isolated right as the holotype specimen of M. roseae. Additionally, Coria and Currie assigned several paratypes to M. roseae, including portions of the skull, limbs, pelvis, and vertebrae. In total, Mapusaurus is known from parts of the skull and mandible, teeth, some cervical,, and caudal vertebrae, much of the sacrum and pelvis, some ribs, parts of the, much of the hindlimbs, many pedal phalanges, and fragments of the forelimb and manus. Later studies have reidentified some of the elements described by Coria and Currie, such as a that American paleontologist Matthew Carrano and colleagues stated is a distal humerus and a partial fibula that Canadian paleontologist Phil Bell and Coria identified as a pathological dorsal rib.

''Taurovenator''

In 2005, a right of a theropod dinosaur was unearthed by Argentine paleontologist Matias Motta from a section of sandstone strata in Violante Farm in Rio Negro Province, Argentina deriving from the lower member of the Huincul Formation. The fossil was then transported to the Museo Provincial "Carlos Ameghino"and cataloged under catalogue number MPCA-Pv 803. In 2016. Motta and colleagues described the postorbital as the holotype of a new genus and species of carcharodontosaurid dinosaur, Taurovenator violantei. Taurovenator went largely unnoticed due to its fragmentary nature, and Coria and colleagues suggested that Taurovenator is synonymous with Mapusaurus, considering both of the former's autapomorphies were also found in Mapusaurus. Additionally, the authors considered that there was a high likelihood of them being coeval. However, Taurovenator is actually from the lower unit of the Huincul Formation, while Mapusaurus is from the upper unit of the formation, suggesting they could be distinct genera. In 2022, another carcharodontosaurid from the Huincul Formation, Meraxes, was named on the basis of a well-preserved skull and partial skeleton from the same strata as Taurovenator. In their description of Meraxes, the authors stated that Taurovenator lacks sufficient diagnostic characters and may be coeval with Meraxes.
In 2005, an associated skeleton including a partial skull and posterior mandible, incomplete cervical series, fragments of dorsal vertebrae, several ribs, two partial forelimbs, a femur, a partial pes, gastralia, and a caudal vertebra was unearthed along with the Taurovenator. This specimen was regarded as belonging to an indeterminate carcharodontosaurid in the 2016 description of Taurovenator. In 2024, this specimen was described and, despite not overlapping in material with the holotype, was assigned to Taurovenator. In an analysis of the strata from which the holotype was discovered, the 2024 study noted that the Huincul Formation is separated into two distinct sequences; a lower section of thin, multicolored sandstones and an upper section of thick conglomeratic sediments. Mapusaurus derives from the upper sequence of the formation, whereas Meraxes and Taurovenator are exclusive to the lower rock layers. Meraxes, however, was collected in strata close to the Candeleros-Huincul Formation boundary, whereas Taurovenator's specimens were found over 30 meters above the Candeleros-Huincul Formation limit. It is for these reasons that the three carcharodontosaurids found at Huincul were potentially not coeval, supporting the argument for Taurovenator's validity. Additionally, the holotype preserve features of the Giganotosaurini, further supporting its referral to Taurovenator. A new host of diagnostic traits were found on the bones of MPCA-Pv 803, properly demonstrating its distinctiveness''.''

Description

In their paper describing Mapusaurus, Coria and Currie estimated that the specimens found in the bonebed measured between in length, with the former being based on a left dentary and the latter being based on a left femur. Subsequent maximum size estimates vary from around, and weight estimates range from.

Skull and dentition

The skull of Mapusaurus was deeper and narrower than that of Giganotosaurus, due to the comparative shortness of the maxillae and slenderness of the nasal bones. The nasals were very rugose, as in Carcharodontosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Meraxes, and Tameryraptor. The lateral surface of the maxilla in many carcharodontosaurids had a rough texture, and the same is true of Mapusaurus. Whereas the rugosity of Giganotosaurus' maxilla stopped shortly posterior to the nasal opening, that of Mapusaurus continued for most of the bone's length. The bar between the antorbital and, the so-called interfenestral strut, was fairly wide in comparison to other carcharodontosaurids. Whereas many derived carnosaurs had several openings in the maxilla anterior to the antorbital fenestra, in Mapusaurus, the maxillary fenestra was the only one, and it disappeared with growth. The antorbital fossa was about equal in size to that of Carcharodontosaurus and Giganotosaurus. The orbit, or eye socket, was partly divided into upper and lower sections by projections of the lacrimal and postorbital bones. Like in many derived carcharodontosaurids, such as Meraxes, the lateral postorbital surface bore a robust brow horn. The lacrimals and prefrontal bones were fused, as in many theropods, including Giganotosaurus. The lacrimals of the two genera differed in that Mapusaurus' lacrimal had a rugose dorsal surface, whereas that of Giganotosaurus bore deep grooves. Mapusaurus' teeth were similar to those of other carcharodontosaurids, being flat, narrow, and blade-like and bearing 10–12 denticles per, as opposed to 13–15 denticles per 5 mm in Acrocanthosaurus. There were 12 alveoli in each maxilla, as opposed to 14 in Carcharodontosaurus.
The of Mapusaurus, the part of the lower jaw which bore teeth in life, was similar to that of Giganotosaurus in that it expanded anteriorly more than in most other theropods; this is contributed to by a ventral flange on the mandibular symphysis. While loosely similar expansions are seen in other groups and genera, such as Tyrannosaurus, in Mapusaurus, the presence of this distinctive flange in a juvenile suggests that it was not controlled by ontogeny. In both Mapusaurus and Giganotosaurus, the Meckelian groove is fairly shallow, though that of the former genus was positioned more dorsally. A partial surangular is known from a juvenile Mapusaurus specimen, which is identical to the corresponding bone in Giganotosaurus. The angular bone was strengthened by a thick ventral margin, which contributed to the ventral portion of the mandible. Each dentary appears to have had fifteen teeth.

Axial skeleton

The vertebral column of Mapusaurus closely resembled that of Giganotosaurus. As in most carnosaurs, the neural arches, the masses of bone or cartilage posterior to the main vertebral bodies, were inclined posterodorsally. The neural spine of the axis, the second cervical vertebra, appears to have been longer and more gracile than those of Mapusaurus. There were well-developed laminae between the neural spine and vertebral epiphysis, which are not observed in more basal taxa such as Acrocanthosaurus and Allosaurus. Further back in the cervical column, the neck vertebrae were proportionally shorter and slimmer than those of Giganotosaurus, more closely resembling abelisaurids in their proportions. The neural spines of the dorsal vertebrae were relatively tall and were inclined posteriorly. The more posterior dorsal vertebrae were, meaning that both anterior and posterior surfaces were flat. Mapusaurus' caudal vertebrae are well known from various specimens. The neural spines of the mid-caudal vertebrae were low and anteroposteriorly elongated. The most posterior one had a low regular neural spine and a second, accessory one anterior to it. The anatomy of the preserved ribs, which resemble those of many other large theropods, suggests that the chest of Mapusaurus would have been deeper than it was wide. Various fragmented gastralia, the bones which would have supported the abdominal organs and served as muscle attachment points, are known, and do not seem to have meaningfully differed from those of other big theropods.

Appendicular skeleton

Mapusaurus' scapula was long and gently curved, with a pronounced, sharply offset acromial process, similar to other carnosaurs and tyrannosaurids. It is less robust than that of large ceratosaurs and megalosaurids. The scapula and coracoid were distinct bones, and did not co-ossify into a scapulocoracoid. One partial coracoid is known. A possible furcula is preserved, though there is a possibility that it is a fused pair of gastralia. What is known of the humerus based on a right humerus, MCF-PVPH-108.45, was fairly robust. The humerus was around a quarter of the length of the femur, and its arms were thus relatively short. The radius was relatively massive. Little is preserved of the manus. The second and third metacarpals appear to have been partly fused, though there is no indication that the first metacarpal had fused with the others. A single manual phalanx is known, as well as a probable ungual phalanx which may be from the second digit.
The pelvis and hind limbs are very well preserved in comparison to the pectoral girdle and forelimbs. The ratio between the preacetabular and postacetabular lengths of the ilium is about the same as in the holotype of Giganotosaurus. At the back of the ilium, near the base of the peduncle where the ischium articulated, there were a series of shallow pits, likely attachment sites for the iliofemoralis and caudofemoralis muscles. Three femora are known. Unlike most other carnosaurs, the fourth trochanter, one of the structures to which the caudofemoralis muscles would have attached, was prominent. It was similar in size to that of Giganotosaurus, though both were exceeded by that of Carcharodontosaurus. Like in Giganotosaurus, the lateral side of the tibia of Mapusaurus extends further down than the medial side. The fibula, the other lower leg bone, was slightly more gracile than in the holotype of Giganotosaurus. The metatarsals of Mapusaurus were fundamentally to those of other carnosaurs. Eight pedal phalanges are represented, though no pedal unguals are preserved.

Paleobiology

The fossil remains of Mapusaurus were discovered in a bone bed containing at least seven to possibly up to nine individuals of various growth stages. Coria and Currie speculated that this may represent a long term, possibly coincidental accumulation of carcasses and may provide clues about Mapusaurus behavior. Other known theropod bone beds and fossil graveyards include those of dromaeosaurids Deinonychus and Utahraptor, those of Allosaurus from the Cleveland-Lloyd Dinosaur Quarry of Utah, and those of tyrannosaurids Teratophoneus, Albertosaurus and Daspletosaurus.
Paleontologist Rodolfo Coria, of the Museo Carmen Funes, contrary to his published article, repeated in a press-conference earlier suggestions that this congregation of fossil bones may indicate that Mapusaurus like Giganotosaurus also hunted in groups and worked together to take down large prey, such as the immense sauropod Argentinosaurus. If so, this would be the first substantive evidence of gregarious behavior by large theropods other than Tyrannosaurus rex, although whether they might have hunted in organized packs or simply attacked in a mob, is unknown. Through the study of bonebed of at least nine Mapusaurus individuals from the Canadon Del Gato site in Neuquén Province, Argentina, researchers have discovered that their skeletal abnormalities were rare but present, containing trauma being the most common cause. meaning that the predatory animal was living in that of a hazardous and perilous lifestyle. The authors interpreted the depositional environment of the Huincul Formation at the Cañadón del Gato locality as a freshwater paleochannel deposit, "laid down by an ephemeral or seasonal stream in a region with arid or semi-arid climate". This bone bed is especially interesting, in light of the overall scarcity of fossilized bone within the Huincul Formation. An ontogenetic study by Juan Ignacio Canale and colleagues in 2014 found that Mapusaurus displayed heterochrony, an evolutionary condition in which the animals may retain an ancestral characteristic during one stage of their life, but lose it as they develop. In Mapusaurus, the maxillary fenestrae are present in younger individuals, but gradually disappear as they mature.
A biomechanical model of Tyrannosaurus presented by William I. Sellers and colleagues in 2017 suggested that speeds above would probably have shattered the leg bones of Tyrannosaurus. The finding may mean that running was also not possible for other giant theropod dinosaurs like Giganotosaurus, Mapusaurus and Acrocanthosaurus.

Classification

Mapusaurus is a genus in the family Carcharodontosauridae, subfamily Carcharodontosaurinae, and tribe Giganotosaurini. Giganotosaurini contains Mapusaurus itself in addition to the carcharodontosaurines Meraxes, Giganotosaurus, and Tyrannotitan, but excludes the African genus Carcharodontosaurus. In their description of Mapusaurus, Coria and Currie erected the subfamily Giganotosaurinae. They defined this subfamily as including all carcharodontosaurids closer to Mapusaurus and Giganotosaurus than Carcharodontosaurus and as being united by the presence of a weak fourth trochanter and a broad groove on the distal end of the femur. They tentatively included the genus Tyrannotitan in this new subfamily, pending publication of more detailed descriptions of the known specimens of that form. Giganotosaurini is a tribe of giant carcharodontosaurines endemic to the Late Cretaceous of Argentina, with some members like Giganotosaurus possibly being the largest theropods known, reaching sizes as large as in length and in mass.
American paleontologist Paul Sereno's description of Carcharodontosaurus fossils in 1996 led to the realization of a transcontinental clade of carcharodontosaurids. As more carcharodontosaurids were discovered, their interrelationships became even clearer. The group was defined as all allosauroids closer to Carcharodontosaurus than Allosaurus or Sinraptor by American paleontologist Thomas R. Holtz and colleagues in 2004. Mapusaurus is better known than most other carcharodontosaurids, though Meraxes and Giganotosaurus represented by nearly complete skeletons. Carcharodontosaurians have been recognized from the Late Jurassic to the Mid-Cretaceous of every continent except Antarctica.
In their 2022 description of the large carcharodontosaurine Meraxes, Juan I. Canale and colleagues recovered the following relationships for Mapusaurus and the Giganotosaurini.
In his 2024 review of theropod relationships, Cau recovered similar results, with Tyrannotitan as the sister taxon to the clade formed by Mapusaurus and Giganotosaurus. His results are displayed in the cladogram below:

Evolution

Argentine paleontologists Coria and Leonardo Salgado suggested that the convergent evolution of gigantism in theropods could have been linked to common conditions in their environments or ecosystems. Sereno and colleagues found that the presence of carcharodontosaurids in Africa, North America, and South America, showed the group had a transcontinental distribution by the Early Cretaceous period. Dispersal routes between the northern and southern continents appear to have been severed by ocean barriers in the Late Cretaceous, which led to more distinct, provincial faunas, by preventing exchange. Previously, it was thought that the Cretaceous world was biogeographically separated, with the northern continents being dominated by tyrannosaurids, South America by abelisaurids, and Africa by carcharodontosaurids. The subfamily Carcharodontosaurinae, in which Carcharodontosaurus belongs, appears to have been restricted to the southern continent of Gondwana, where they were probably the apex predators. The South American tribe Giganotosaurini may have been separated from their African relatives through vicariance, when Gondwana broke up during the Aptian–Albian ages of the Early Cretaceous.

Paleoenvironment

Mapusaurus was discovered in the Argentine Province of Neuquén. It was found in the Huincul Formation, a rock formation bordering the Río Limay Subgroup, the latter of which is a subdivision of the Neuquén Group. This unit is located in the Neuquén Basin in Patagonia. The Huincul Formation is composed of yellowish and greenish sandstones of fine-to-medium grain, some of which are tuffaceous. These deposits were laid down during the Upper Cretaceous, either in the middle Cenomanian to early Turonian stages or the early Turonian to late Santonian. The deposits represent the drainage system of a braided river.
Fossilised pollen indicates a wide variety of plants were present in the Huincul Formation. A study of the El Zampal section of the formation found hornworts, liverworts, ferns, Selaginellales, possible Noeggerathiales, gymnosperms, and angiosperms, in addition to several pollen grains of unknown affinities. The Huincul Formation is among the richest Patagonian vertebrate associations, preserving fish including dipnoans and gar, chelid turtles, squamates, sphenodonts, neosuchian crocodilians, and a wide variety of dinosaurs. Vertebrates are most commonly found in the lower, and therefore older, part of the formation.
In addition to Mapusaurus, the theropods of the Huincul Formation are represented by the other giant carcharodontosaurids Meraxes and Taurovenator, abelisaurids including Skorpiovenator, Ilokelesia, and Tralkasaurus, noasaurids such as Huinculsaurus, paravians such as Overoraptor, and other theropods such as Aoniraptor and Gualicho have also been discovered there. Several iguanodonts are also present in the Huincul Formation. The sauropods of the Huincul Formation are represented by the titanosaurs Argentinosaurus and Choconsaurus, and several rebbachisaurids including Cathartesaura, Limaysaurus, and some unnamed species.