Party-list proportional representation
Party-list proportional representation is a system of proportional representation based on preregistered political parties, with each party being allocated a certain number of seats roughly proportional to their share of the vote.
In these systems, parties provide lists of candidates to be elected, or candidates may declare their affiliation with a political party. Seats are distributed by election authorities to each party, in proportion to the number of votes the party receives. Voters may cast votes for parties, as in Spain, Turkey, and Israel ; or for candidates whose vote totals are pooled together to determine the share of representation of their respective parties, as in Finland, Brazil, and the Netherlands.
Voting
In most party list systems, a voter will only support one party. Open list systems may allow voters to support more than one candidate within a party list. Some open-list systems allow voters to support different candidates across multiple lists, which is called free list or panachage.Selection of party candidates
The order in which a party's list candidates get elected may be pre-determined by some method internal to the party or the candidates or it may be determined by the voters at large or by districts.Closed list
In a closed list system, each political party has pre-decided who will receive the seats allocated to that party in the elections, so that the candidates positioned highest on this list will always get a seat in the parliament while the candidates positioned very low on the closed list will not. Voters vote only for the party, not for individual candidates.Open list
An open list describes any variant of a party-list where voters have at least some influence on the order in which a party's candidates are elected. Open lists can be anywhere from relatively closed, where a candidate can move up a predetermined list only with a certain number of votes, to completely open, where the order of the list completely depends on the number of votes each individual candidate gets.Apportionment of party seats
Within party-list PR systems, there are a variety of different methods that can be used to determine how many seats are allocated to each party for a given vote breakdown. The method used to allocate seats within party-list proportional representation vary. Some apportionment methods may favor small parties; others may favor large parties:- D'Hondt method
- Sainte-Laguë method
- Huntington–Hill method
- Adams' method
- LR-Hare
- LR-Droop
D'Hondt method
- Example :
| Round | A quotient | B quotient | C quotient | Seat to |
| 1 | 1000 | 800 | 400 | A |
| 2 | 500 | 800 | 400 | B |
| 3 | 500 | 400 | 400 | A |
| 4 | 333.33 | 400 | 400 | B |
| 5 | 333.33 | 266.67 | 400 | C |
- Result: A = 2, B = 2, C = 1
Sainte-Laguë method
- Same vote totals as above.
| Round | A quotient | B quotient | C quotient | Seat to |
| 1 | 1000 | 800 | 400 | A |
| 2 | 333.33 | 800 | 400 | B |
| 3 | 333.33 | 266.67 | 400 | C |
| 4 | 333.33 | 266.67 | 133.33 | A |
| 5 | 200 | 266.67 | 133.33 | B |
- Result: A = 2, B = 2, C = 1
Modified Sainte-Laguë method
- Divisors: 1.4, 3, 5,...
| Round | A quotient | B quotient | C quotient | Seat to |
| 1 | 714.29 | 571.43 | 285.71 | A |
| 2 | 333.33 | 571.43 | 285.71 | B |
| 3 | 333.33 | 266.67 | 285.71 | A |
| 4 | 200 | 266.67 | 285.71 | C |
| 5 | 200 | 266.67 | 133.33 | B |
- Result: A = 2, B = 2, C = 1
Hare quota (largest remainder)
- Quota = Total votes / Seats = 2200 / 5 = 440
| Party | Votes | Initial seats | Remainder |
| A | 1000 | 2 | 120 |
| B | 800 | 1 | 360 |
| C | 400 | 0 | 400 |
- Remaining 2 seats to C and B
- Result: A = 2, B = 2, C = 1
Imperiali quota (largest remainder)
- Quota = Total votes / = 2200 / 7 = ~314.29
| Party | Votes | Initial seats | Remainder |
| A | 1000 | 3 | 57.14 |
| B | 800 | 2 | 171.42 |
| C | 400 | 1 | 85.71 |
- 1 leftover seat to B
- Result: A = 3, B = 2, C = 1
Huntington–Hill method
The apportionment methods can be classified into two categories:
- The highest averages method, including the D'Hondt method is used in Armenia, Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Croatia, Estonia, Finland, Poland, and Spain; and the Sainte-Laguë method is used in Indonesia, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden.
- The largest remainder methods, including the Hamilton method and Droop method.
List proportional representation may also be combined with other apportionment methods in various mixed systems, using either additional member systems or parallel voting.
Example
Below it can be seen how different apportionment methods yield different results when apportioning 100 seats.Webster's method yields the same result. Otherwise, all other methods give a different number of seats to the parties.
Notice how the D'Hondt method breaks the quota rule and favors the largest party by "rounding" an ideal apportionment of 35.91 up to 37.
Adams' method greatly favors smaller parties, giving 2 seats to the smallest party, and would give at least 1 seat to every party receiving at least one vote.
Electoral threshold
List of countries using party-list proportional representation
The table below lists countries that use a proportional electoral system to fill a nationally elected legislative body. Detailed information on electoral systems applying to the first chamber of the legislature is maintained by the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network. Countries using PR as part of a parallel voting or other mixed system are not included.| Country | Legislative body | List type | Variation of open lists | Apportionment method | Electoral threshold | Constituencies | Governmental system | Notes |
| Albania | Parliament | Open list | ? | d'Hondt method | 4% nationally or 2.5% in a district | Counties | Parliamentary republic | |
| Algeria | People's National Assembly | Open list | ? | Hare quota | 5% of votes in respective district. | Provinces | Semi-presidential republic | |
| Angola | National Assembly | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | 5 member districts and nationwide | Parliamentary republic with an executive presidency | Double simultaneous vote use to elect the President and the National Assembly at the same election. | |
| Argentina | Chamber of Deputies | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | 3% of registered voters in the constituency | Provinces | Presidential republic | |
| Armenia | National Assembly | Open list | ? | D'Hondt method | 5%, 7% | None | Parliamentary republic | Party lists run-off, but only if necessary to ensure stable majority of 54% if it is not achieved either immediately or through building a coalition. If a party would win more than 2/3 seats, at least 1/3 seats are distributed to the other parties. |
| Armenia | National Assembly | Closed list | — | D'Hondt method | 5%, 7% | None | Parliamentary republic | Party lists run-off, but only if necessary to ensure stable majority of 54% if it is not achieved either immediately or through building a coalition. If a party would win more than 2/3 seats, at least 1/3 seats are distributed to the other parties. |
| Aruba | Parliament | Open list | D'Hondt method | None | ||||
| Austria | National Council | Open list | More open: 14% on the district level | Hare quota | 4% nationally | Single-member districts within federal states | Semi-presidential republic, de facto parliamentary | |
| Austria | National Council | Open list | More open: 10% on the regional level | Hare quota | 4% nationally | Federal states | Semi-presidential republic, de facto parliamentary | |
| Austria | National Council | Open list | More open: 7% of the on the federal level | d'Hondt method | 4% nationally | Single federal constituency | Semi-presidential republic, de facto parliamentary | |
| Belgium | Chamber of Representative | Open list | D'Hondt method | 5% | Electoral districts | Federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy | ||
| Bénin | National Assembly | Closed list | — | Largest remainder method | 10% | Departments | Presidential republic | |
| Bolivia | Chamber of Senators | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | Departments | Unitary presidential republic | Ballots use the double simultaneous vote: voters cast a single vote for a presidential candidate and their party's list and local candidates at the same time | |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | House of Representative | Open list | Sainte-Laguë method | Electoral districts | Federal parliamentary directorial republic | |||
| Brazil | Chamber of Deputies | Open list | Fully open | D'Hondt method | 2% distributed in at least 9 Federation Units with at least 1% of the valid votes in each one of them | States and Federal District | Presidential republic | |
| Bulgaria | National Assembly | Open list | Hare quota and largest remainders | 4% | Electoral districts | Unitary parliamentary republic | ||
| Cape Verde | National Assembly | Closed list | — | D'Hondt method | Electoral districts | Semi-presidential republic | ||
| Chile | Chamber of Deputies | Open list | D'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | Electoral districts | Presidential republic | ||
| Chile | Senate | Open list | D'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | Electoral districts | Presidential republic | ||
| Colombia | Chamber of Representatives | Closed list | — | D'Hondt method | 3% | Departments | Unitary presidential republic | |
| Colombia | Senate | Closed list | — | D'Hondt method | 3% | None | Unitary presidential republic | |
| Costa Rica | Legislative Assembly | Closed list | — | Hare quota and largest remainders | Subquota | Departments | Presidential republic | |
| Croatia | Sabor | Open list | D'Hondt method | 5% | Constituencies | Parliamentary republic | ||
| Cyprus | House of Representatives | Open list | Hare quota and largest remainders | No de jure threshold | Electoral districts | Presidential republic | ||
| Czech Republic | Chamber of Deputies | Open list | Relatively open: 5% on the district level | Imperiali quota with national remnant in the first scrutiny | 5% nationally for single party lists, 7% for coalitions of two, 11% for coalitions of more than 2. | Regions and capital | Parliamentary republic | |
| Czech Republic | Chamber of Deputies | Open list | Relatively open: 5% on the district level | Hagenbach-Bischoff quota + largest remainders | 5% nationally for single party lists, 7% for coalitions of two, 11% for coalitions of more than 2. | National remnant seats redistributed to districts | Parliamentary republic | |
| Denmark | Folketing | Open list | Modified Sainte-Laguë method for leveling seats | 2% | Electoral districts | Parliamentary republic | 135 constituency seats, 40 leveling seats | |
| Dominican Republic | Chamber of Deputies | Closed list | — | D'Hondt method | Departments | Presidential republic | ||
| Ecuador | National Congress | Closed list | — | Sainte-Laguë method | Provinces | Presidential republic | ||
| El Salvador | Legislative Assembly | Open list | D'Hondt method | 10% | Departments | Presidential republic | ||
| Estonia | Riigikogu | Open list | D'Hondt method | 5% | Electoral districts | Parliamentary republic | ||
| Faroe Islands | Løgting | Open list | D'Hondt method | None | Parliamentary republic | |||
| Fiji | Parilament | Open list | D'Hondt method | 5% | None | Parliamentary republic | ||
| Finland | Parliament | Open list | Fully open | D'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | Electoral districts | Parliamentary republic | |
| Germany | Bundestag | Localized list | Separate vote for candidates | Only first place candidate may win seat | 5% or 3 constituencies, first place for independents | Constituencies | Federal parliamentary republic | The system was recently modified to an essentially closed list proportional system with a local constituency vote to eliminate the need for overhang seats. In the new system, the number of seats a party can win is capped, if they "won" more seats by plurality, not all of their winners will be elected. |
| Germany | Bundestag | Closed list | — | Sainte-Laguë method | 5% or 3 constituencies, first place for independents | Federal states | Federal parliamentary republic | The system was recently modified to an essentially closed list proportional system with a local constituency vote to eliminate the need for overhang seats. In the new system, the number of seats a party can win is capped, if they "won" more seats by plurality, not all of their winners will be elected. |
| Greenland | Inatsisartut | Open list | D'Hondt method | None | Parliamentary republic | |||
| Guatemala | Congress of the Republic | Closed list | — | D'Hondt method | Departments | Presidential republic | ||
| Guyana | National Assembly | Closed list | — | Hare quota + largest remainders | No de jure threshold | Regional constituencies | Parliamentary republic with an executive president | The president is elected by a first-past-the-post double simultaneous vote system, whereby each list nominates a presidential candidate and the presidential election itself is won by the candidate of the list having a plurality. |
| Guyana | National Assembly | Closed list | — | Hare quota + largest remainders | No de jure threshold | National constituency | Parliamentary republic with an executive president | The president is elected by a first-past-the-post double simultaneous vote system, whereby each list nominates a presidential candidate and the presidential election itself is won by the candidate of the list having a plurality. |
| Honduras | National Congress | Open list | Fully open with panachage | Departments | Presidential republic | |||
| Iceland | Althing | Open list | Regions | Parliamentary republic | ||||
| Indonesia | House of Representative | Open list | Sainte-Laguë method | 4% | 3 to 10 members constituencies | Presidential system | ||
| Israel | Knesset | Closed list | — | 3.25% | None | Parliamentary system | ||
| Kosovo | Assembly of the Republic | Open list | Sainte-Laguë method | None | ||||
| Latvia | Saeima | Open list | Sainte-Laguë method | 5% | Regions | Parliamentary republic | ||
| Lebanon | Parliament | Open list | Regions | |||||
| Liechtenstein | Landtag | Open list | 8% | Regions | ||||
| Luxembourg | Chamber of Deputies | Open list | Panachage | d'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | Four multi-member constituencies, ranging from 7 to 23 members | Parliamentary system | |
| Macedonia | Assembly | Closed list | — | Regions | Parliamentary system | |||
| Moldova | Parliament | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | 5%, 7%, 2% | None | Unitary parliamentary republic | |
| Montenegro | Parilament | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | 3% | None | Parliamentary system | |
| Namibia | National Assembly | Closed list | — | None | Presidential republic | |||
| Netherlands | House of Representatives | Open list | More open | d'Hondt method | No de jure threshold, but an effective threshold of 0.67% for a seat | None | Parliamentary system | |
| Norway | Parliament | Closed list | — | modified Sainte-Laguë method | No de jure threshold | 19 multi-member constituencies | Parliamentary system | First divisor is 1,4 instead of 1. |
| Norway | Parliament | Closed list | 4% for leveling seats | modified Sainte-Laguë method | One seat in each constituency is used for nationwide leveling | - | Parliamentary system | First divisor is 1,4 instead of 1. |
| Paraguay | Chamber of Deputies | Closed list | — | Departments | Presidential republic | |||
| Peru | Congress of the Republic | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | 5% | Departments | Presidential republic | |
| Poland | Sejm | Open list | Fully open | d'Hondt method | 5% or 8% nationally, no threshold for national minority organisations | 41 multi-member constituencies, ranging from 7 to 20 members | Semi-presidential republic | - |
| Portugal | Assembly of the Republic | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | Districts | Semi-presidential republic | |
| Romania | Chamber of Deputies | Closed list | — | Counties | Presidential republic | |||
| San Marino | Grand and General Council | Open list | 3.5% | None | If needed to ensure a stable majority, the two best-placed parties participate in a run-off vote to receive a majority bonus. | |||
| São Tomé and Príncipe | National Assembly | Closed list | — | Constituencies | ||||
| Serbia | National Assembly | Closed list | — | 3% | None | Parliamentary republic | ||
| Sierra Leone | Parliament of Sierra Leone | — | Districts | Presidential republic | ||||
| Sint Maarten | Parilament | Open list | None | Parliamentary republic | ||||
| Slovakia | National Council | Open list | Droop quota and largest remainders | 5% | None | Parliamentary republic | ||
| Slovenia | National Assembly | Open list | Fully open | Droop quota | 4% | Districts | Parliamentary republic | |
| Slovenia | National Assembly | Open list | Fully open | d'Hondt method | 4% | Districts | Parliamentary republic | |
| South Africa | National Assembly of South Africa | Closed list | — | Droop quota | No de jure threshold | Provinces of South Africa | Parliamentary republic with an executive president | |
| Spain | Congress of Deputies | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | 3% | Provinces of Spain | Parliamentary system | |
| Sri Lanka | Parliament | Open list | Panachage | d'Hondt method | 5% | Constituencies | Semi-presidential system | |
| Sri Lanka | Parliament | Closed list | — | ? | No de jure threshold | None | Semi-presidential system | |
| Suriname | National Assembly | Open list | Fully open | d'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | Districts of Suriname | Assembly-independent republic | |
| Sweden | Riksdag | Open list | More open | Sainte-Laguë method | 4% nationally or 12% in a given constituency | Counties of Sweden | Parliamentary system | |
| Switzerland | National Council | Open list | Fully open with panachage | Hagenbach-Bischoff system | No de jure threshold | Cantons of Switzerland | Semi-direct democracy under an assembly-independent directorial republic | |
| Timor-Leste | National Parliament | Open list | d'Hondt method | None | ||||
| Tunisia | Assembly of the Representatives of the People | Closed list | — | Largest remainder method | No de jure threshold | Constituencies | Semi-presidential system | |
| Turkey | Grand National Assembly | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | 7%. No threshold for independent candidates. | Provinces of Turkey | Presidential system | |
| Uruguay | Chamber of Representatives | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | Departments of Uruguay | Presidential system | Ballots use the double simultaneous vote, the same ballot is used for electing the president and the two chambers |
| Uruguay | Chamber of Senators | Closed list | — | d'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | None | Presidential system | Ballots use the double simultaneous vote, the same ballot is used for electing the president and the two chambers |