Invercargill City Council v Hamlin
Invercargill City Council v Hamlin 3 NZLR 513, 1 NZLR 513 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding council liability for negligent inspection, as well the issue in tort when the start period for the statute of limitations for a latent defect begins.
Background
Hamlin built a house in 1972 in Invercargill. 17 years later in 1989, Hamlin noticed cracks in his houses foundations. A subsequent builders report revealed the council had signed off building consent on the house when it had substandard foundations.Hamlin sought compensation from the council, who refused to pay, claiming that a council does not owe a duty of care for building inspections, and even if it was, the council was not liable here, as the event happened 17 years, this claim was barred by the 6 year time limit under the Statute of Limitations.
Held
The High Court found the council liable, and awarded damages of $53,550. The council subsequently unsuccessfully appealed to the Court of Appeal, as well as the Privy Council.Footnote: Section 393 of The Building Act 2004 now limits such a claim to 10 years from the date of the act or omission giving rise to the claim.