Ian Lumley
Ian Lumley is an Irish conservationist, who has notably served with An Taisce - The National Trust for Ireland over an extended period, principally as its heritage officer, and latterly as one of its three senior managers, as head of advocacy.
Early life
Ian Lumley was born in Waterford in 1958.Conservation work
Lumley was a volunteer with An Taisce for many years before becoming its heritage officer around 2000, and in 2023 taking up the new post on a rationalised senior management team of three, as "head of advocacy", overseeing the organisation's work on planning and policy. Described in the Irish Times as "one of Ireland's most courageous guardians of the built and natural environment", Lumley has focused his approach on using legal tools and processes to address developments of concern.Lumley has also worked as director of projects with the Dublin Civic Trust and held a senior role with the Spitalfields Historic Buildings Trust in London. Much of Lumley's work, even in formal roles, has been unpaid.
Lumley also sits on the board of the Alfred Beit Foundation which looks after Russborough House as a nominee of An Taisce.
Court cases
In January 2005, Lumley was barred from acting as a director of a number of companies for five years, after a High Court hearing into the liquidation of a limited company he co-founded to campaign on environmental issues.In April 2019, Lumley lost an appeal to An Bord Pleanála on plans to extend the number of Airbnb-style studio lettings at his Georgian property in Dublin. This followed the refusal of planning permission to Lumley and builder Patrick Wigglesworth to convert the lower ground floor of their property at 3 Henrietta Street into three short-term-lease studio apartments.
In January 2023, Lumley was sued in the High Court by one of his tenants, Luke Barnett, alleging that he was threatened with eviction. Barnett claimed he was woken up on 16 January 2023 by loud banging, and found Lumley and some masked men standing there. Lumley said that Barnett did not have a tenancy agreement, and also alleged Barnett had received repeated warnings over his behaviour, and claimed Barnett had engaged in repeated anti-social behaviour. The case was settled on confidential terms.