Hugh Ellwood Macbeth Sr.
Hugh Ellwood Macbeth Sr. was an African American attorney who defended Japanese American wartime legal rights in California during the Second World War.
Education and early career
Hugh Macbeth Sr. was born in 1884 in Charleston, North Carolina. He attended Fisk University and completed his legal education at Harvard Law School in 1908. He practiced law in Maryland until 1912, and became the founding editor of the Baltimore Times during that time. He relocated to Los Angeles, California, during 1912-1913, where he opened a law office with fellow Harvard Law graduate Willis Oliver Tyler. Nevertheless, in 1927, Macbeth Sr. led a group of African American and Jewish lawyers in successfully challenging the exclusion of either group from the California Bar Association. In 1938, he became the executive secretary of the California Race Relations Commission, which was created by then California governor Frank Merriam.Representing the legal rights for Japanese Americans during WWII
With Executive Order 9066 was issued by the US government, Japanese Americans were ordered into internment camps. Macbeth Sr. represented Japanese Americans before the US government on this issue. In 1943, he joined the legal team of the Japanese American Citizens League to work on the Regan v. King case, which was a court case which sought the removal of voting rights for Japanese Americans during wartime. He was on the Korematsu v. United States legal team which challenged Executive Order 9066 which authorized the internment of Japanese Americans. He signed the amicus curiae brief for the case. Unfortunately, the US Supreme Court ruled on this case that the US constitutional allowed for incarceration based on race, although the conviction was later overturned.In 1945, he was part of the legal team that represented Fred and Kajiro Oyama as they challenged the Alien Land Act in California. The case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court as Oyama v. California. The Supreme Court ruled in 1948 that enforcement of the act must end. This created a key legal precedent for future rulings concerning segregation.