Hirt's law
Hirt's law or Hirt–Illich-Svitych's law, named after Hermann Hirt, who originally postulated it in 1895, is a Balto-Slavic sound law that triggered the retraction of the accent under certain conditions.
Overview
Under Hirt's law, a non-initial accent was retracted to a non-ablauting vowel, if it was followed by a consonantal laryngeal that closed the preceding syllable. The retraction did not take place if the laryngeal did not immediately follow the syllable nucleus, i.e. if the nucleus contained a vocalic or sonorant diphthong such as ey or en. However, the retraction did take place onto a syllabic sonorant, showing that Hirt's law applied before the epenthesis of the high vowels *i and *u before syllabic sonorants.Hirt's law followed the creation of the distinction between fixed and mobile accentual paradigms in early Balto-Slavic. In two-syllable forms, only mobile paradigms had forms with non-initial stress, so Hirt's law could only operate on them. In longer stems, both fixed and mobile paradigms were affected.
In fixed paradigms
Hirt's law only affected fixed-accent forms if they had three or more syllables, since fixed-accent paradigms could not have forms with a final accent, only mobile paradigms could. The result was a straightforward shifting of the columnar accent one syllable to the left, with the paradigm remaining fixed.In mobile paradigms
In mobile paradigms, Hirt's law affected the final-accented forms. This is visible in disyllabic endings of the ā-stem nouns, which have penultimate accent where the equivalent endings of other inflection classes have final accent. Late Common Slavic reflects this as a distinction of neoacute versus normal acute.In the locative plural:
- In the ā-stems: Pre-Balto-Slavic *-áHsu > *-aHsú > *-áHsu > Proto-Balto-Slavic *-ā́ˀsu > Late Common Slavic *-àxъ > Slovene and Chakavian -àh, with a short vowel resulting from a Slavic acute.
- In the o-stems: Pre-Balto-Slavic *-óyšu > *-oyšú > Proto-Balto-Slavic *-aišú > Middle Common Slavic *-ěxъ́ > Late Common Slavic *-ě̃xъ > Slovene -éh, Chakavian -íh, both with a long vowel resulting from a Slavic neoacute.
- Convert the paradigm to a fixed-accent paradigm, by shifting all remaining non-initial accents onto the first syllable.
- * Pre-Balto-Slavic *duHmós "smoke" > *dúHmos > Proto-Balto-Slavic *dū́ˀmas > Lithuanian dū́mai, Late Common Slavic *dỳmъ
- * Pre-Balto-Slavic *griHwáH "?" > *gríHwaH > Proto-Balto-Slavic *grī́ˀwāˀ > Latvian grĩva, Late Common Slavic *grìva
- Analogically restore the normal mobile accentuation, by moving the accent back from the first onto the second syllable and thus undoing Hirt's law.
- * Pre-Balto-Slavic *suHnús "son" > *súHnus > *suHnús > Proto-Balto-Slavic *sūˀnús > Lithuanian sūnùs, Late Common Slavic *sy̑nъ
- * Pre-Balto-Slavic *giHwós "alive" > *gíHwos > *giHwós > Proto-Balto-Slavic *gīˀwás > Lithuanian gývas, Late Common Slavic *žȋvъ
Valence theory
In the valence theory of Indo-European accentuation, the concept of “the retraction of the accent” is meaningless for describing the Balto-Slavic accent system with automatic placement of ictus. This means that in fact Hirt's law describes metatony “recessive acute ⇒ metatonic acute”. In morphophonological terms, this Balto-Slavic metatony is formulated as follows: Metatony “recessive acute ⇒ metatonic acute” occurs in the syllable of a recessive morpheme, if followed by a second dominant syllable. In tonological terms, this is the conversion of a low laryngealized syllable tone into a rising-falling laryngealized syllable tone. While the secondary dominant syllable was caused by tone assimilation by Indo-European metatony, which is in an additional positional distribution.The fact, that metatony is not the result of the retraction of the accent is indicated by inlautend metatony with a dominant n-infix: Proto-Slavic *sę̋detь, cf. *sěditь̀ ; *bǫ̋detь, cf. *by̋ti and aorist *by̑.
Metatony acts only on the historical Early Balto-Slavic mobile accent paradigm with a recessive acute, thereby forming accent paradigms with extremely complex accent curves. Such curves have always been aligned, as a result of which one can see lexicalized variants in the form of doublets and triplets, distributed across dialects:
- Proto-Indo-European *suH-nús → Proto-Balto-Slavic *sū́n-ùs → Common Slavic *sy̑nъ ; Old Lithuanian súnus ⇔ Lithuanian sūnùs ;
- Proto-Indo-European *meh₂-tḗr → Proto-Balto-Slavic *mā́t-ē̃ → Common Slavic *ma̋ti ; Lithuanian mótė ⇔ Lithuanian dial. motė̃ ;
- Proto-Indo-European *deh₂i-wḗr → Proto-Balto-Slavic *dā́iw-ē̃ → Common Slavic *dě̋verь ⇔ *dě̑verь ; Lithuanian díeveris ⇔ dieverìs.
- Proto-Balto-Slavic *krē̂sl-ȁn → Common Slavic *krě̋slo, borrowing from nom.-acc. pl. *krě̋sla, with metatony from Proto-Balto-Slavic *krḗsl-ā́.
- In the locative plural:
- * Proto-Balto-Slavic *gâr-ā̃-sù → Common Slavic *gorãxъ → Czech horách, Chakavian gorãh, Old Polish -åch.
- In the illative plural:
- * Proto-Balto-Slavic *gâlw-ā̃-sù-nā́ → *galvõsuna → Lithuanian galvósna → galvós.