Gonzalo Thought
Gonzalo Thought, also known as Marxism–Leninism–Maoism–Gonzalo Thought and Gonzaloism, is an ideological doctrine developed by Peruvian revolutionary Abimael Guzmán as an interpretation of Peruvian reality based on Marxism–Leninism–Maoism.
Anti-revisionist in nature, Gonzalo Thought was the ideological basis of the Communist Party of Peru—Shining Path and the trigger for the Peruvian Civil War of 1980–2000. The ideology is based on the synthesized philosophies of Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Mao Zedong, and José Carlos Mariátegui. The term "Gonzalo Thought" comes from the alias used by Abimael Guzmán, "Chairman Gonzalo", who was considered by his followers to be the "Fourth Sword of Marxism", a direct successor to Marx, Lenin, and Mao.
Although initially raised from the Peruvian reality through a Marxist analysis, Gonzalo Thought expanded to culture, society and language outside Peru and formed the ideological basis of revolutionary groups abroad.
Its adherents put it into practice on their way to implement the People's Republic of New Democracy through the doctrine of "protracted people's war", often entailing terrorist actions and guerilla warfare.
After the capture of Abimael Guzmán in 1992, various currents claimed to maintain Gonzalo Thought while other Sendero leaders, such as Comrade José, renounced Gonzalo Thought altogether and adopted other ideological lines or simply turned to drug trafficking.
Guzmán first began speaking of "Gonzalo Thought" as the party's guiding ideology in the late 1980s.
Influences
The figures who inspired Abimael Guzmán were Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and José Carlos Mariátegui, as well as the academic Efraín Morote Best, who was rector at the National University of San Cristóbal de Huamanga in Ayacucho.Gonzalo Thought was first called "Guiding Thought of Comrade Gonzalo", then "Guiding Thought of President Gonzalo" and, after the celebration of the First Congress of the Shining Path, it would become "Gonzalo Thought".
The bases of Gonzalo Thought are:
- Marxism, from which he interprets the class struggle and the dictatorship of the proletariat as realities of the world. Therefore, the revolution in a certain place had to be part of the proletarian world revolution, to which it had to belong and support. In addition to the belief in the inevitability of the revolutionary transition that would take human societies from capitalism to communism.
- Leninism, from which he adopted the idea that the revolution would be possible through the work of a party constituted as a "war machine", made up of a vanguard of "cadres" that would in turn be the most advanced expression of the world proletariat, destined to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat. In addition, imperialism is described as a new stage of capitalism.
- Maoism, which mainly included the experience of the Chinese Communist Revolution and the concept of people's war, to which Guzmán granted the category of principle of universal validity, along with Mao's theory of contradictions, according to which the struggle of opposites would be generalized at all levels of matter, society and thought.
Components
Anti-revisionism
Gonzalo Thought adheres to the anti-revisionist line of Marxism, considering revisionists as:A cancer, a cancer that has to be ruthlessly swept away, otherwise we will not be able to advance in the revolution; and remember what Lenin said, synthetically, we must forge in two issues, forge in revolutionary violence and forge in the implacable struggle against opportunism, against revisionism.In this way, ideological purity and complete adherence to what was considered the correct line within Marxism was encouraged.
Use of violence
Gonzalo Thought calls for the use of violence through the "people's war" and the "blood quota." For Guzmán:Regarding violence, we start from a principle established by Chairman Mao Tse Tung: violence is a universal law without any exception, I mean revolutionary violence; This violence is what allows us to resolve the fundamental contradictions with an army and through the people's war. It is a substantive question of Marxism because without revolutionary violence one class cannot be replaced by another, an old order cannot be overthrown to create a new one, a new order led by the proletariat through communist parties.Violence, as a manifestation of class struggle, was seen as a fundamental step to overthrow the old, enabling the emergence of an overcoming stage of capitalism: communism.