Fossil Future
Fossil Future: Why Global Human Flourishing Requires More Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas–Not Less is a 2022 book by Alex Epstein that argues in support of fossil fuels. The book also criticizes experts, who Epstein says have often been wrong in their predictions about climate change.
Reception
The book received mixed and contradictory reviews.Foreign Policy called the book a sequel to the "flawed" arguments of Epstein's first book, The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. Slate also criticized the book stating, "This New Style of Climate Denial Will Make You Wish the Bad Old Days Were Back." The New Republic said of the book that, "We may all start hearing about more often because the time is ripe for his particular brand of fossil fuel boosterism to become the GOP's mainstream climate talking point." Vox stated that the book, and Epstein more generally, offers a form of "complacent optimism."
Economist Tyler Cowen, writing in his blog Marginal Revolution offered a mix of praise and criticism, stating that "Why could he not have had the subtitle: “Why Global Human Flourishing Requires More Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas for a while, and Then Less”? Then I would be happier. In economic language, you could say he is not considering enough of the margins." Roger Pielke Jr., a professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado and someone who, like Epstein, is considered part of the community that rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, wrote a critical review of the book, saying that Epstein's arguments are based on faulty logic and that his observation that the Industrial Revolution was the result of fossil fuels does not support his conclusion that they are necessary in the future.
Several conservative think-tanks and their publications praised the book, including the conservative non-profit organization Capital Research Center and the libertarian Ayn Rand Institute. A review in City Journal, a publication of the conservative think-tank the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, praised the way the book celebrated the achievements of fossil fuels but criticized it for creating a false dichotomy. Sources from within the fossil fuel industry, meanwhile, were universally positive in their reception of Epstein's work.