Cosegregation

Cosegregation, in genealogy, refers to the tendency of two or more genes located close together on the same chromosome to be inherited together during cell division. Due to their physical proximity, these genes are considered genetically linked and are likely to be inherited together.
In genetics, the term may also refer to the estimated probability of interaction between multiple loci or specific regions within a target gene. This probability is assessed using data derived from nuclear profiles, which are thin slices taken from a cell nucleus. Within each NP, the presence or absence of particular loci is evaluated.
These interaction probabilities—referred to as cosegregation values—are used in mathematical models such as SLICE and normalized linkage disequilibrium. These models contribute to the generation of 3D genome architecture maps as part of genome architecture mapping techniques. The resulting 3D renderings provide insights into genomic density and the radial positioning of loci within the nucleus.

Title	Description
Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by Genome Architecture Mapping.	Co-segregation between a pair of loci helped in this study to quantify Normalized Linkage Disequilibrium.
A simple method for cosegregation analysis to evaluate the pathogenicity of unclassified variants; BRCA1 and BRCA2 as an example.	Using co-segregation analysis along with a multifactorial approach resulted in highly conclusive results when attempting to classify unclassified variants.
Considerations in assessing germline variant pathogenicity using co-segregation analysis.	This article found that utilizing Bayes factor co-segregation analysis, along with a strong penetrance model, will result with higher accuracy than meiosis counting.
A Comparison of Cosegregation Analysis Methods for the Clinical Setting	Compares the utility of using full likelihood Bayes factor, cosegregation likelihood ratios, and counting meiosis to evaluate the pathogenicity of genetic variants.
Dissecting the co-segregation probability from genome architecture mapping	Assesses the utility of cosegregation in Genome Architecture Mapping, finding normalized probability calculations a reasonable representation of inter-locus distance

History

Some of the earliest known studies that have used cosegregation in genealogy dates back to the early 1980s. Around this time, scientists were conducting experiments on vegetative organisms to see if there are unique sequences of chloroplast DNA. The process of the experiment was to track the chloroplast gene in each generation by clustering the genes in nucleoids to reduce the number of segregated units. This study was done at the Duke University in the Zoology Department where Karen P. VanWinkle-Swift utilized Pedigree Diagrams to show how the traits and sequences were passed down from parent to child.
In genetics, Cosegregation in Genome architecture mapping is another process being used to identify the compaction and adjacency of genomic windows. In a study from 2017, cosegregation was used to understand gene-expression-specific contacts in organizing the genome in mammalian nuclei in the larger process of GAM. The results of the study produced complex 3D structures that displayed interactions under certain regions of chromatin contacts and proved that GAM is a useful tool in the genome biologist's skill set that expands the ability to finely dissect 3D chromatin structures, cell types and valuable human samples. A study in 2021 "discovered extensive 'melting' of long genes when they are highly expressed and/or have high chromatin accessibility. The contacts most specific of neuron subtypes contain genes associated with specialized processes, such as addiction and synaptic plasticity, which harbour putative binding sites for neuronal transcription factors within accessible chromatin regions." Both of these studies used mice as models due to their anatomical, physiological, and genetic similarity to humans.

Usage

In genetics, Cosegregation is best suited for cases where multiple factors' interactions are under consideration. It can show how different factors are linked and highlight their interactions and connections. For example, if a genetic disorder was identified as related to a certain gene, but is not always present when that gene is, then a cosegregation analysis could help identify other genes that interact with the suspect gene more often than normal. This could lead researchers to discover the combination of genes that manifest the genetic disorder. Cosegregation is being actively used in medical fields like cancer research. It can highlight the strongest connections between genes in cases where cancer develops. This is useful because there often isn't a single gene causing cancer. Rather, cancer can be caused by a multitude of gene combinations. Cosegregation helps to show links between genes that could be forming these combinations.

Examples of using cosegregation in genetics

An example of an application using cosegregation would be finding the normalized linkage disequilibrium between two loci. Given a 2D dataset a "1" was displayed if an NP existed in a window or a "0" otherwise. From this data, the NLD could be found using the base disequilibrium and its theorized maximum. The amount of NPs present in loci and, is then used to find the, and and the co-segregation which is,. After the NLD is found between two loci, it was then placed into another dataset to be visualized and then analyzed to determine how interconnected a loci is.
This example was executed using python for computation and visualization of the given data and results and in finding the NLD. Using the NLD further analysis can be done to place the windows into "communities". To showcase this a graph to the right will show the community of one of the windows with the highest centrality which uses the average of the window's NLDs.
An alternative method to using Normalized Linkage Disequilibrium is Normalized Pointwise Mutual Information (NPMI). NPMI measures how closely two loci are associated by taking the log of their joint cosegregation probability,, divided by their independent probabilities,. This log is then divided by the log of their joint probability, to normalize the result.
Both NLD and NPMI range between -1 and 1 and reflect how the joint cosegregation probability deviates from what would be expected if the two loci were independent. However, they differ in scope as NLD measures linear relationships, while NPMI can capture more complex, non-linear relationships between the loci.

Formula

This formula can be easily programmed into code as seen in the pseudo-code in the figure to the right. The code was written to satisfy the Example described above.

Advantages

Given a large dataset of nuclear profiles, cosegregation is easily scalable given its simplistic mathematical formulas. The larger the data set that is provided, the more accurate the following equations will be. As depicted in the photo below, the amount of data being added to the equation merely adds linear time adjustments to the original equation.
Fortunately, not only is it able to scale dataset sizes well, it is able to take as many loci of focus that are required to determine the interaction probability. Provided that adding each loci adds a single computation to the equation, a linear time complexity is the result. The picture below shows how the amount of loci affects the detection frequency equation.
Finally, the numerical value that results can assist in drawing multiple conclusions including radial position, compaction, and the most influential contacts.

Limitations

Effective cosegregation analysis depends largely on having a strong supporting dataset because even small inaccuracies can be compounded by cosegregation. A complete understanding of the material is necessary as cosegregation only provides connections between datapoints. The interpretation of those connections must be done through another method. For example, locus cosegregation can give a score of genes that commonly interact with each other, but no matter how strong those relationships are, the results of quantitative cosegregation can seem to support either a correlated, anti-correlated or independent relationships. It is important to be aware of this and follow up cosegregation analysis with another form of analysis, such as normalized linkage disequilibrium to correct for the compounding effect cosegregation can have on negligible variations in the detection frequency of the data.
For example, imagine a simple form of cancer that is trigged by a small number of genes. Here we are examining a suspect gene and three other genes that are suspected to be involved in the processes. This chart shows a hypothetical data set of 10 people and their cancer status as well as if they possess the four genes of interest. Looking at the graph, there is a clear connection between the suspect gene and Gene A. There is also a less obvious interaction between the suspect gene and Gene C that only takes place when Gene B is absent. It is entirely possible that co-segregation would have a hard time determining that relationship. Gene B is commonly present with Gene A and that combination does result in cancer. In a real data set with hundreds or even thousands of genes being examined, one could erroneously conclude that Gene B contributes to the cancer when, in reality it does not and can actually prevent it.
Another limitation of this technique is that many mapping tools measure not only specific physical interactions between genes but also random contacts, the latter being much more common between genes with smaller linear genomic distance this could lead to inflated co-segregation scores. GAM has helped to resolve this issue because in GAM the detection of genomic windows is independent of any interactions with other regions. This allows for an expected interaction value to be calculated and combining this with the co-segregation results to filter out the noise of random connections this will provide a cleaner result.Also an advantage of using GAM is the reduced sample size needed compared to analyze data compared to chromosome conformation capture methods. It also benefits from not needing ligation, which is not guaranteed to occur in a consistent manner

Visualizations

Matrices

Matrices are a rectangular structured array of numbers where the entries can be summed, subtracted, multiplied, and divided using the standard math operations. In the case of co-segregation, Graph theory is used to see if a variable shares an edge or vertex with another variable on a network of nodes. Graph theory is the mathematical study of objects using pairwise relations that is shown through connected nodes called vertices that are connected to other nodes by edges.
The image above depicts the conversion from a cosegregation matrix to an adjacency matrix is one use of a matrix in genome architecture mapping where scientists are using cryosectioning to find colocalization between DNA regions, genomes, and/or alleles. In that example, cosegregation is being used to describe the linkage of data to each other in terms of the distance between specific windows in a genome. The values in the cosegregation matrix were found using the formula above. Comparing windows, the formula seeks to find the intersection of Nuclear Profiles between the respective windows. The genomic windows would be the nodes and the adjacency graph is the matrix depiction of the edges connecting each node.

Heat maps

A heat map is a visual representation of a matrix of that can show different phenomenons on a two-dimensional scale. Heat maps have a range of color intensities based on the values and scale given from the data. Coding-wise, heat maps can be created using libraries such as in Python. Using co-segregation, heat maps are used to visualize a matrix that contains values of either 1 or 0 to visualize the commonalities between 2 or more variables. "The primary benefit of using heat maps is that they make otherwise dull or impenetrable data understandable. Many people understand heat maps intuitively, without even needing to be told that those warmer colors indicate a denser focus of interactions."
In the limitation section, there are two heat maps shown depicting the difference between normalized and un-normalized data. Showing the difference in the graphs would help the researcher identify different patterns based on the intensity of the color gradients as well as the clustering of data points. Cosegregation results as seen above can have different forms and visualizing them in heat maps can aid researchers in understanding which genomes are connected similar to matrices.
The heat map below is a different representation of the data which uses the normalized linkage table instead of the resulting adjacency matrix. This visualization gives more variation and better shows the advantages of using a heat map.
One limitation to heat maps are that some software does not allow the use of locating specific points on the graph, especially if there are many variables. There are coding libraries such as plotly.express that can create interactive heat maps where the programmer can hover over specified points on a graph and read the exact dependent variable's value. Another limitation is that heat maps do not represent real-time data. Since heat maps work by aggregating data over time, it does not show recent changes in behavior compared to the more dominant patterns already present.

Network Diagrams

A network diagram is a visual representation of a network, which consists of distinct nodes and edges, or the interactions between these nodes. In genetics, network diagrams can be created using cosegregation adjacency matrices.
To convert an adjacency matrix to a network diagram, one must translate the matrix elements into visual nodes and edges, where non-zero values indicate connections between nodes, thereby creating a graphical representation of the genetic interactions. Below is an image of a network diagram created using the NetworkX library in Python.